I need my cis followers to do more to share the voices of trans people. Anti-trans articles get 2,500 retweets while those trans people write are barely getting a hundred or two.
It's not enough not to oppose trans people. You must make our voices as loud as theirs.
In my trans studies class, I teach students about 'cisgender mediation' - about how the shape and visibility of trans narratives is determined by cis people who stand between us and the audience.
The most obvious example is the editor who decides who gets published, makes suggested edits and picks the title of the article.
But it's also you. It's also every single cis follower when they decide to retweet or not to retweet something trans people say.
That's why @PsychSerg and I advocated for doctors to step outside of the clinic and loudly support and amplify trans voices. I think the advice holds for everyone else, too.
Right now, their hate is far stronger than your love for us. Make it the other way around. Love us more strongly, more vocally, and more gratefully than they hate us. Make our voices a thousand times louder than theirs.
We need you.
(And yes, I unfortunately realise that this post will get a lot of retweets from people who feel interpellated, only for them to go back to rarely retweeting trans voices after an hour to a week. We all do it.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A just-published study (that I won't link to because they don't deserve views) looked at cis people's perception of pre-FFS and post-FFS quality of life, in comparison to being blind in one and two eyes. This isn't only useless but super grossly transmisogynistic and ableist.
So grossly ableist, in fact, that they literally removed from the study people who rated being blind in two eyes as a higher quality of life than being blind in one eye - which has a high chance of excluding participants who are, you guessed it, blind in both eyes.
As for the transmisogyny, it arises from the fact that they're not actually building on any experience of facial gender dysphoria (contrary to their claim).
Trans health is an irreducibly political area of medicine. Clinicians must become aware of that politicization and actively engage with trans communities in humble, attentive and supportive ways, using their power to better trans lives across the board.
Since Abigail Shrier is promoting the unsupported hypothesis of ‘rapid-onset gender dysphoria’ in her new book, let’s talk about why it’s wrong. I will be basing this off my recent peer-reviewed paper on the topic:
The term ROGD appeared in 2016 when Lisa Littman began recruiting for her study on anti-trans sites like 4thWaveNow, which are dedicated to opposing trans rights and access to affirmative care, especially for youth. 2/
It very quickly spread once the abstract of a conference presentation was published in 2017. Conservative journalists began publishing on it in droves before it was even peer reviewed and published in full. 3/