And maybe he should consider the climate before putting another SUV on our roads in the future theguardian.com/environment/ng…
This isn’t political. I’m not a Corbynite taking my chance to jab at Starmer.
But I am a progressive person, and I want the leader of the UK’s progressive party to live progressive values.
And that means taking climate change and the environment seriously.
It means taking the health and safety of pedestrians and cyclists seriously.
It means striving to end car dependency that has been punishing for our most vulnerable, not contributing to it.
A child from the lowest socioeconomic bracket is 28 times more likely to be killed by a driver than someone from the highest.
It’s just not okay.
To all those in my mentions saying Starmer probably had a good reason to be driving an SUV in central London — is this the kind of thing you were thinking? thetimes.co.uk/article/cyclis…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One thing I think drivers don't get is that the inconvenience they're experiencing from school streets, LTNs and cycle lanes is miniscule in comparison to the inconvenience other road users have been asked to take for the benefit of drivers over the years.
Your journey is five minutes longer? I feel you! As a cyclist, I'm often forced to take longer routes because the quickest path from A to B doesn't have adequate infrastructure or isn't safe for someone on a bike.
You have to wait at traffic lights on main roads instead of breezing through residential back streets? I feel you! As a pedestrian my journey is frequently interrupted by trying to find a safe place to cross a road, and waiting at lights that prioritise cars over me.
I don't know who needs to hear this but creating pro-LTN petitions to counteract the anti ones isn't a strategic use of your time.
Here's why:
Opponents are sharing their petitions all around the country. They're getting signed by motorist groups, taxi drivers, and other interest groups in an attempt to boost the numbers.
But all that does is make them irrelevant for local authorities trying to gauge local opinon.
That's good news and bad news for supporters.
Because unless you take on the same tactic of sharing the petitions beyond local boundaries (and hence making them irrelevant) you'll never be able to get an equivalent number of signatures.
I’ll be on @BBCPoliticsLDN in just a few minutes talking about @RailtonLTN and the freedoms it’s given me as a new cyclist.
Also for the record I do try and dress to coordinate with all journalists I speak to
To Theresa Villiers and others who are like ”why do they need a bike lane on park lane when there’s already one on Hyde Park”. Imagine applying that argument to cars — why should we build a second road? They already have one over there!
1) We still don’t have enough cycle infrastructure — we’re moving in the right direction, but councils haven’t done enough to show you can get by without a car -- especially to parents of young kids and those who move cargo
2) The trains cost too damn much! Beyond that, public transport is unreliable, unconnected and uncomfortable. Drivers think they might save by giving up their car, but not enough to justify the hassle
Here's me in 2016 -- joking about wanting to learn how to ride a bike. It's an ambition I didn't achieve until 2017, and it took until June of this year for me to actually to it around London.
But if I'm completely honest, riding a bike is never something I thought I could do.
There were lots of reasons why I didn't think cycling was for me. Partly it was fear -- of drivers, of failure, of falling.
Partly it was because I didn't see myself represented in the lycra clad, male dominated cycle culture.
But partly, it was because of my body.
I've always been bigger than I want to be, and I've always been too self-conscious about it.
Over the past few years it's something I've tried to overcome -- trying diets, calorie counting, and all kinds of exercise to try and build a body I was comfortable with.