Interpretation of Financial Statements - preliminary filters.
1. Looking for sustainable competitive advantage:
When looking for sustainable moat, you wanna see consistency - in earnings, in having low debt, in having growing earnings, low spending in capital expenditures, etc.
The longer the company has existed, and if it sells you the same product for years (like Coca Cola), it reduces production costs and other costs (R&D, Training, marketing) slowly as the company ages.
When costs are reduced, margins and profits increase.
2. What to look for in an income statement:
Let's take a look at Apple:
i) You want to see earnings grow at a steady pace. Take a look at the net income below.
ii) Another thing that's important is a consistent and high gross margin.
As a thumb rule, Warren Buffett wants to see a gross margin of around 40% or above.
Although not quite 40%, it's around that range with respect to Apple.
Compare this to Apple's competitors.
Samsung's gross margins are around similar range, highest being 45.7% in 2018, and Huawei had a gross margin of 38.6%.
Having a high gross margin indicates the scalability of the business. The more the company sells, the greater the profitability becomes. Such a trait is what you want to see in a business you want to own.
You want to see the company having higher net margin compared to their competitors.
Apple's net margin is around 22%. Samsung's net margin is around 18% and Huawei's net margin is around 8.5%.
Typically, net margin above 20% is a very strong one, indicating that we are dealing with a smoothly run business.
3) In the balance sheet:
Look at the figure - "Retained Earnings".
Using retained earnings, you can find out if a company is reinvesting its income or not. A steady growth in this number means the business is profitable, and that it's identifying good investing opportunities.
Apple doesn't fulfill the criteria regarding retained earnings. But that's because in 2013, Apple started a rigorous dividends and share repurchase program.
To measure how efficiently a company is using these retained earnings, Return on Equity (ROE) is used.
To calculate ROE, compare Net income to the Total Equity of the company.
Apple looks quite strong in this aspect. It's partly an effect of distributing a lot of their earnings to shareholders. It also signifies the sustainable competitive moat.
Compare this with Samsung (ROE:18.3%) and Huawei (ROE:25.3%), Apple shows significant strength.
4) Exceptional businesses seldom require a lot of debt to expand (except maybe banks/NBFCs). Instead, they can just use the strong cashflow from the business.
So, look for businesses with little to no long term debt. If a company can pay off with all its long term debt with less than 4 years of earnings, it signifies a good position for the company. Apple fulfills this criterion. Samsung and Huawei do too.
5) In a cashflow statement:
This is where you see the actual in's and out's of money.
Look at "Capital Expenditures" on the cashflow statement.
This is the money being spent on properties, plant, and equipment.
Look at what percentage of net income the capital expenditures are. You want it to be as low as possible, lower than 25% over a period of time is considered very good. Less than 50% is okay-ish.
Exceptions: One time payment to grow the business in some capex activity.
Look at Apple's CAPEX spendings. Compare that with their net income, and you can see that their average capex spending is less than 25% of their net income. Samsung (around 65%) and Huawei (around 45%) aren't even close.
Also, in Apple's cash flow statement, we can see the reasons why the retained earnings from the balance sheet haven't been growing from 2012. Apple has been distributing a lot of cash to its shareholders.
Apple's Augmented Payout Ratio (includes share buybacks and dividends) has been higher than 100% in some years. This basically means Apple's distributing more money than it earns.
5) When to sell?
3 instances when you could consider selling the stock.
i) You need money for a better investments. This is more so applicable in a bear market, for you to switch from something great to something exceptional.
ii) When a company loses its competitive advantage. Times change, and once monopolistic companies are constantly being disrupted. If your investment faces such a risk, cut it loose.
iii) During crazy raging bull market. Even if a company runs a fantastic business, it could be a bad investment if you have to pay insane price. At such times, at such price, you could selling a fantastic business if you already have held onto it for a long time.
At a PE of 40 or higher, you should start considering selling your stocks, even if you believe in the underlying economics of the company.
This may not always apply to all markets, all stocks. But with anything above 40PE, tread carefully and cautiously.
So, key takeaways:
- Competitive advantage and scale
- Consistently high net income, return on equity
- Requires very little debt
- Retained earnings has steady growth
- Capital expenditures should be < 25%
- Sell a company if prices are crazy, or a better opportunity comes up.
The Swedish Investor YT channel has some interesting playlists on financial statements. Check it out. These insights I gathered are from one of his videos.
Looks like unseen volumes have come into PVR post april.
Usually such volumes are associated with institutions.
If you look at the big drop in march, the volumes aren't that high. Marginally higher than usual/average, but not significantly high enough to consider institutional selling.
But look at the circled region after april. That looks like institutional activity.
Two possibilities:
1. Institutions are betting on PVR as a contrarian bet and accumulating it.
2. Institutions are realising that PVR is junk and selling it to naive retail buyers.
1. Share your experience and help people save time:
Cutting learning curve, learning about potential mistakes, pointing towards the better sources of information to learn things from, preventing people from spending on useless workshops, etc.
2. Share your experience and help people save money:
Sharing cost effective ways to achieve x, cutting cost where possible without cutting quality, achieving x goal in less than average expected cost, preventing monetary losses due to avoidable mistakes, etc.
So, when I say in the example (in the thread linked above) that the system makes on average 200 trades a year, and 29-30 points per trade in BNF, what do I mean?
Average points made per trade in BNF over the 200 trades.
If you really want to learn from someone on social media, you don't have to pay for their courses or any special access programs.
Like Ekalavya, you can consume with intent whatever your self-assumed Guru puts out in the form of content.
When you use a bit of common sense, reverse engineering, and connecting the dots as a practice with all that they post, you can figure out with 95-98% what they do, how they do it, why they do it, etc.
When I initially started moving towards systematic trading, I read all of @madan_kumar's tweet threads, blog posts, zerodha qna interview and its comments section, his threads on traderji forum, etc. Those have the best insights most of which he likely condenses in his workshops.
Independent theaters are going to survive Covid better than the franchises like Inox and PVR.
Independent multi-screen, privately owned theaters are likely to be self-owned(including building) by the owner group and must have contained the damage during covid early on.
Theaters are going to co-exist with OTT. The side-effect of OTT would be a slight/marginal reduction in piracy.
But people are never not going to go to theaters. A movie like Interstellar, Tenet, Endgame, Fast and Furious 7, Kaithi, etc., deserve a theater watch.
So, theaters are here to stay. Just that, I feel that independent and privately owned theaters have a far better chance of survival than the publicly listed franchisee type theater groups. Interesting times ahead to be witnessed.
Most people who quit their job essentially as an act of showing middle finger to their bosses, and start a business don't realize that they are focusing on short term pain and ignoring the long term pain that running a business is.
Starting and running a business, especially as a middle-class first generation entrepreneur is not easy. If you do it only because you hate your current boss, a couple years down, the entrepreneurship world would eventually teach you working for your former boss was way better.
Pride, vanity, and moments of impulsiveness, focusing on stopping the short term pain - all these block your long term visibility, and gives you tunnel vision. This makes it very difficult for you to assess if your decision is one that's coming from a place of emotion.