A good starting point for the topic. I was going to tailor it for a certain audience but, best thing to do is just start. Mostly sourced by @CJBowden1 who you should follow. Documents following will include links, PDFs, videos, commentary, etc.
A prime example of this would be the unprecedented banning of "non-essential" goods from store shelves. There are many such examples but that one should strike anyone witnessing it as without explanation. It's been happening the whole time but, people are now beginning to notice.
Enter the "Great Reset." Many of you were aware of this as was I but, I was shocked not so much by the transparency of the propaganda as by the cluelessness of those I assumed were following along. Economic "thought leaders" have been sleeping on the job.
4 years later and this revelation is being treated like some bombshell dropped w/o warning by the very people who are supposed to be on top of this. They understand the folly of the fed, have no equal in terms of economic understanding, yet missed this.
I can understand how most wouldn't believe this was the face of the Global Totalitarian Corporativist State and instigator of the Great Reset. I can't accept such dismissals by knowledgeable people. This predilection for repudiation of "conspiracy theories" must end right now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many of the points I make are seemingly dramatic but actually merely subtle clarifications on what is already widely understood but misidentified or misinterpreted. Most obvious example is that the state is designed to do what it's doing, it's not "corrupt." Elections won't help.
The state hasn't mistakenly foisted a dangerous medical procedure unknowingly or without due consideration. It has carefully examined its options and chosen the most destructive biological weapon it could reasonably deploy, meticulously planning a propaganda campaign to coincide.
Importation of vast numbers of migrants isn't a failure of border security but a coordinated campaign to cause chaos and dilute existing populations. Obviously, this has been done by the state deliberately with the full cooperation of its agents, agencies, and corporate organs.
As I've mentioned, it's good that people recognize that corporate organs of the state are our enemies. For now, that will have to do. In terms of understanding the landscape, learning about corporativism is the next major step. It does appear some people are beginning to get it.
Once it's understood that corporativism is a collectivist ideology and government form, entirely hostile to free market capitalism, the corporativist arrangement can be properly inspected. First misunderstanding that needs to be dispelled is that we're seeing regulatory capture.
Regulatory capture is a concept recognized by 19th century capitalists as an inherent flaw to government regulation. State interference in trade necessarily creates an opportunity to manipulate state's interventions to benefit particular market participants, typically incumbents.
As I have been saying from the outset, the purpose of almost all of what's happening is because the state is implementing planned society. Movement licenses, so-called "15 minute cities," etc. are all undeniable examples.
We know for a fact that planned societies cause collapse.
Advocates of planned society used to make the case that replacing freedom with planning would improve efficiency and increase quality of life. That argument was fully debunked so planners have swapped their justification from improvement to necessary decrease in quality of life.
Rather than progress or advancement of the human condition, the theme is now "sustainability" and deliberate unapologetic opposition to innovation. These ideas are woven through every state program, government education syllabi, propaganda campaign, and popular culture itself.
Anyone who still believes in government is either complicit or uninformed. I don't think there's another category. Only the latter can be helped but time is a problem.
Here's an open question for which there ought to be many examples of if the rule of law was actually applicable.
When was the last time a constitution restricted government from doing something it was dead set on doing?
My qualification is obviously unfair but that's the point.
To wit, constitutions are little more than talking points, they're nothing more than unenforceable guidelines which may be circumvented or ignored at any time for any reason. Because of this, arguments in their defense as evidence of limitations on the state should be dismissed.
The chief error made by most is that the mechanical analogies used to describe the social control systems sought by cyberneticists are conflated with the science of cybernetics. In fact they are metaphors intended to communicate the concept rather than as literal exemplary cases.
It is possible to describe the idea of a feedback loop using the real-world example of a steam engine, shut-off valve, etc. Indeed, you can even call those systems examples of cybernetic systems because they adhere to the principal of intrinsic error control via feedback.
However, as is evident once the science of cybernetics is understood, the "discoverers" (their words) of cybernetics weren't attempting to formulate a science to describe the pre-existing technique of intrinsic regulation of mechanical systems but to apply them to social systems.
Considering recent events and the possibility of rogue ex-state dead-ender's likely attempts to poison water supplies, an abundant source of energy such as this would allow large scale distillation and other high-energy applications to be maintained locally.
We do need to speculate about what our enemies will do. This is part of my idea for the fictional future history I am calling Bunker Hunters. I wish to explore as many potential scenarios as possible so that we can formulate responses and possibly even deter such attacks.