Love Jack Dorsey tastefully reminding Congress that Twitter is like nine times smaller than the “Big Tech” companies he’s constantly getting dragged into hearings with.
Congress: We must rein in the digital ad behemoths! And the companies that control our phones! And a massive retailer with a drone division!
Oh and also that website where everybody posts their hot takes and apology screenshots, get that one in there too.
Twitter punches way above its weight in media influence — it’s a de facto wire service for lots of journalists and public figures. But as an actual digital platform, it’s *way* smaller than Facebook/Google, without any of those companies’ non-social-media divisions.
If you’re gonna regulate Twitter because people say stuff on there that gets widely picked up by media outlets, you might as well call PRNewswire or Fox News into Section 230 hearings too.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The *other* reason that “otherwise objectionable” matters is that Republican lawmakers/Trump regulators have been trying to export the (c)(2)(A) preconditions into (c)(1), so any changes they make there are sort of a trojan horse for the entire law.
To be clear, most of the stuff the Trump administration wants to do is very legally questionable, so we’re sort of speaking in hypotheticals.
Are you in the right headspace to receive information that could possibly hurt you? Then check out the Senate livestream for our latest Section 230 nightmare hearing! commerce.senate.gov/2020/10/does-s…
The big prospect from this hearing, as explained by @mmasnick: Facebook throwing its weight behind one of the proposals to change Section 230. techdirt.com/articles/20201…
Roger Wicker nods to the (largely illusory) bipartisan anti-230 consensus. “There is strong agreement from both sides of the aisle that hearing from these witnesses is important.” The witnesses are Google’s Sundar Pichai, Twitter’s Jack Dorsey, and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg.
If you’re a fan of tech-related Senate hearings, man this is your week. We’re about to start a hearing on the EARN IT Act, aka the “no really, we promise this isn’t about banning encryption” bill! judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/the-e…
Welcome to the EARN IT Act hearing, featuring: charts.
Lindsey Graham kicks off the hearing with a warning about how Facebook finds a lot of child abuse material but will “go dark” because of encryption.
“This bill is not about the encryption debate, but the best business practices, I’m dying to find out what they should be.”
Mike Lee is kicking off with an unusual damper on techlash stuff, saying we "cannot fall prey to the mentality that treats big as categorically bad.” Lee takes a moment to say that US law isn’t like Europe, and that we need to focus strictly on the consumer standard.
Lee says it’s ridiculous that the FTC and DOJ are both carrying out investigations. “I’ve expressed to both my profound frustration that these agencies are conducting monopolization investigations of the very same tech companies at the very same time.”