Let's take a brief journey into the success (or lack thereof) of masks in preventing the spread of coronavirus.
Come with me on a tour of the wonderful world of mask mandates and their results.
Here is a preview of our journey.
(1/16)
First up is Austria. It was one of the first to require masks and it did so about 10 days after its cases began to go down. The downtrend with masks did not change.
After wearing masks for 6 months, cases are now 4x where they were when they mandated masks, and climbing.
(2/16)
Next to mandate was Germany, everybody's favorite success story, until it's not.
It mandated masks about half way down its original recovery. After wearing masks for half a year, their cases are now climbing quickly.
(3/16)
Let's visit Germany's historical foe, France.
The French waited a little longer to mandate masks. They now have around 1000% the daily cases than when they mandated masks despite having one of the highest mask compliance levels in the world.
(4/16)
Across the Pyrenees, Spain was not far behind its French neighbor with a mandate. Spain required masks when cases were near zero and has the highest compliance of mask wearing in all European.
Now Spain is at around 1500% the level of cases than when it mandated masks.
(5/16)
The British really held out on masks for a while. It was a bit late to the European party of wearing masks.
Within 3 months of requiring masks it's now at around 1500% cases despite having one of the highest mask compliance records in Europe.
(6/16)
Our next visit takes us across the English channel as we travel to Belgium. It required masks shortly after the British and now has possibly the highest rate of cases in the world.
(7/16)
Another British neighbor which hasn't done so well is the beautiful country of Ireland. Within 2 months of mandating masks, it is now back in lockdowns and has over 1000% more cases.
(8/16)
Our last stop on the grand tour is Italy, the original European hot spot. It had high mask compliance despite no national mandate.
Skyrocketing cases finally compelled them to create one of the strictest mask mandates in the world, but the results have been predictable..
(9/16)
How about the US? Americans have proven to be highly compliant with mask wearing, even higher than the Germans and similar to the highest levels of compliance found across Europe.
(10/16)
And where has that taken the US? We know not where we want to be.
For example. progressive California required masks in June but cases still went up by over 300% and the state remains heavily locked down to this day.
(11/16)
Hawaii suffered one of the most economically devastating lockdowns of all the US states. It was also an early mover on mandating masks both indoors and out doors, but cases still went up by almost 1000%.
(12/16)
Why don't masks work? For one, if you read the fine print on any consumer mask you will see something along the line of "not intended for medical purposes and has not been tested to reduce the transmission of disease." 🤔
(13/16)
Meanwhile countries with no mask mandates such as Sweden, Norway, and Denmark have not yet hit explosive cases. They might still, but obviously it's not due to lack of masks.
Similarly some Asian countries have had few cases, but the US/Europe shows it's not the masks.
(14/16)
For those looking for a brief explainer on masks, simply watch this quick video to get a better understanding of why masks do very little except in crowded indoor areas... videopress.com/v/4egEyh2b
(15/16)
For those looking for a deeper dive into the science of masks and why for decades scientists were against mass use of mask and what politically changed, see here below, and follow me for more updates.
Correction on Ireland, but same result and same looking graph. It can be confusing to keep track when all these countries have the same runaway cases after mandating masks.
(8A/16)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
- My company, Stress-Free Auto Care, banked exclusively with SVB, but we're not big tech
- All ~60 employees work in auto repair shops
- We have shops in CA and are opening our first shop in TX
- SVB is not all about big tech, it's also about small businesses across the country🧵
On Friday I had less than two hours from the time that I learned of trouble at SVB to when I couldn't even log in.
I moved quickly, but many of Thursday's transfers still sit pending, even while SVB's own employee bonuses cleared on Friday.
You may be wondering why an auto repair shop banked with SVB.
I happened to have grown up in Silicon Valley. I've used SVB for my previous businesses. They loaned my prior business money and I paid it all back.
SVB was considered the "big and safe" bank for startups.
The fact that governments and medical institutions were catastrophically wrong about covid and our response to it will eventually surface. It may take generations, but it will happen.
"If the importance of aerosol transmission had been accepted early, we would have been told from the beginning that it was much safer outdoors"
"And we would have been less obsessed with cleaning surfaces. Our mitigations would have been much more effective, sparing us a great deal of suffering and anxiety."
I just did a deep dive into the FDA Pfizer vaccine document. This immediately jumped out:
Placebo Group
- Participants 18,325
- "Severe cases": 3
Vaccine Group
- Participants 18,198
- "Severe cases": 1
No deaths in either group. It's a difference of 3 to 1 out of 36523 people!
Here is the source document for anyone who wants to go through it themselves: fda.gov/media/144245/d…
So if just ONE severe placebo participant would have been a vaccine participant, the vaccine would have had zero efficacy in preventing severe cases? Those are some crazy stats.
To be clear, I am not anti-vaccine. I've taken many vaccines and I believe they can be a medical miracle. I think the data speaks to the reality of how few people <70 actually get severely sick from covid, and how difficult it is to get statistical significance with such numbers.
Odds of death from an actual covid infection if you are under 50 is somewhere between odds of death by sunstroke and electrocution/radiation.
You won't hear this from the mainstream media, but the numbers are based on the CDC and National Safety Council, and easy to calculate.
And yes, odds of death for the elderly and at-risk is higher.... this is why our policies which try to prevent the healthy from being exposed has only shifts more of the burden to the elderly, and is therefore sadly responsible for more overall deaths.
To put in perspective, somebody under 50 is 3x more likely to die in their life by choking on their own food than by covid-19 and that's if you're infected.
It doesn't mean nobody under 50 can die, and every case is a tragedy, but it does mean we should keep it in perspective.
1/ Let’s take a journey to where “science” got us in 2020.
Santa Clara County (CA) was the first in the US to lockdown. They "followed the science" with perhaps the longest lockdown in the world. Gyms never opened. Indoor dining *never* opened. How did that work out?
2/ Connecticut is the home of Yale and many intellectuals, so surely they followed the science.
Except now they have the highest per capita case count in the country. What about all those masks, lockdowns, and the all mighty #science?
3/ Surely progressive Massachusetts, home to Harvard, MIT, and so many esteemed scientists would follow the science.
They used #science to require people to wear masks even if miles away from others in Nov. No schools, closed businesses, and a curfew. Surely that would work?