Just a reminder as we head toward tomorrow's advance trade data (for September) and the more detailed release next week:
US exports to China of goods covered by the deal normally pick up in the last third of the year.
That is as predictable as the timing of the harvest ...
1/x
Everything has kind of been mucked up for the last two years, though, as China (famously) didn't buy any beans in 2018 (showing the power of the state importing companies).
This year though should be ... more or less normal
2/x
As Chad Bown's detailed numbers* show, ag exports (the sept data for China now comes out early) will be back in line with their 2017 levels (helped by pork) -- but no where close to the big gains promised
*I am shocked @ChadBown included lobsters. Shocked
3/x
But with manufacturing weak*, total U.S. exports are still unlikely to reach 2017 levels, let alone far exceed them.
* There is no advance data for aircraft, and I think the "deal" cheated a bit by allowing orders to count toward the total.
For fun, I plotted covered exports (so no aircraft) to China as a share of US GDP over the last 10ys. To me the big story is still how undynamic they have been both before and after the "deal"
(they were about 0.4% of US GDP back in 17 ...)
5/x
To paraphrase a bit, China's rapid growth shows up everywhere except in its import data
(especially of manufactures)
6/x
The most dynamic large manufacturing export to China is semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and that one is complicated, as, well China's imports here are a function of an industrial policy designed to reduce China's imports of chips*
7/x
*/ there may be a pull forward effect from the threat of export controls as well
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"The problem is there was never enough cash to fund all his [Crown Prince MBS] ambitious initiatives."
Indeed. That's why measures lie the balance of payments breakeven are useful. The Saudis needed $90 plus oil -- or near unlimited access to debt financing
1/
Going into the current conflict, the Saudis were borrowing $100b a year from the rest of the world (that's a form of reverse petrodollars so to speak)
2/
"The country’s projects ran into the trillions of dollars—far more than a government with a $300 billion annual budget could afford."
Imports of computers are up massively (tho not from China) and show no sign of slowing down -- that will mechanically pull the true trade deficit (setting gold flows aside) w/o a big sustained fall in other imports
Pharma/ Irish imports have been weak for a few months now -- probably unwinding front running but I also wonder if the tariff threat led some companies to "unbundle" pricing at the border, & lower their declared import price while charging more for the IP separately
A thread on the February 2026 trade data, with some answers and some questions --
Both nominal imports and nominal exports (ex petrol) are growing again -- with surprising strength in nominal exports and nominal imports back at their end Biden administration levels
1/
I think I know why nominal exports look so strong --
One clue is that "real" exports are much weaker (but to be clear still up; the Trump 2 trade war did not lead to retaliation and lower exports)
2/
And the obvious tell is that exports of gold (counting gold bars, which are hard to find in the raw data) were way up in January and February -- that isn't "real"
Saudi 2025 balance of payments data is out, and the Saudi "current account" break even oil price (based on ~ 7 mbd in exports of crude/ product) is still right around $100 a barrel
1/
the current account break even is the oil price where oil exports cover the rest of the current account -- so there is no deficit in the current account
2/
Now the Saudis are still buying foreign equities (MBS has scaled back but not entirely) even with a current account deficit ...
As I mentioned on Wednesday, there is a $3 trillion gap between China's accumulated current account surplus since the pandemic and China's unchanged reserves (and a corresponding gap in visible flows into the US)
Bank flows make up most of the difference
1/
That was true in q4 -- most of China's foreign bond purchases are done by the banks, so there was $170b or so outflow via the banks in q4 alone. That is about 2/3rds of China's reported q4 current account surplus
2/
The biggest components of that flow were outward deposits (likely funding for the global banks in dollars given the banking data) and purchases of foreign securities
Three big picture observations about the oil surplus (petrodollars/ petroeuros/ petroequities are all downstream of this) pre Hormuz
A) The oil surplus is modest relative to the surplus in Asia. Chinese state banks and offshore deposits of Chinese exporters are way bigger
1/
B) Most oil exporters are in deficit or run only modest surpluses with oil in the 60s or 70s. That importantly includes Saudi Arabia, which now has a BoP break even in the 90s
2/
C) The remaining surpluses are concentrated in Russia (tho its surplus has fallen), frugal Norway and the GCC countries with large SWFs -- who tend to invest most of their surplus in equities (Kuwait is a bit of an exception, recent bond inflows