Brad Setser Profile picture
Oct 27, 2020 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Just a reminder as we head toward tomorrow's advance trade data (for September) and the more detailed release next week:

US exports to China of goods covered by the deal normally pick up in the last third of the year.

That is as predictable as the timing of the harvest ...

1/x Image
Everything has kind of been mucked up for the last two years, though, as China (famously) didn't buy any beans in 2018 (showing the power of the state importing companies).

This year though should be ... more or less normal

2/x Image
As Chad Bown's detailed numbers* show, ag exports (the sept data for China now comes out early) will be back in line with their 2017 levels (helped by pork) -- but no where close to the big gains promised

*I am shocked @ChadBown included lobsters. Shocked

3/x Image
But with manufacturing weak*, total U.S. exports are still unlikely to reach 2017 levels, let alone far exceed them.

* There is no advance data for aircraft, and I think the "deal" cheated a bit by allowing orders to count toward the total.

piie.com/blogs/trade-an…

4/x Image
For fun, I plotted covered exports (so no aircraft) to China as a share of US GDP over the last 10ys. To me the big story is still how undynamic they have been both before and after the "deal"

(they were about 0.4% of US GDP back in 17 ...)

5/x Image
To paraphrase a bit, China's rapid growth shows up everywhere except in its import data

(especially of manufactures)

6/x
The most dynamic large manufacturing export to China is semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and that one is complicated, as, well China's imports here are a function of an industrial policy designed to reduce China's imports of chips*

7/x Image
*/ there may be a pull forward effect from the threat of export controls as well

8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brad Setser

Brad Setser Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Brad_Setser

Feb 5
A central question in the technical debate over China's balance of payments data is the price of an iPhone (a smart phone) in China's export data. China claims that it is inflated, and way higher than the actual cost of production. But that claim doesn't really check out. Image
the US ITC has said that essentially all smart phones imported from China to the US are from Apple -- and the China's export price there is $400. That maps closely to most of the recent knock down studies on the cost of making an iPhone ... the EU/ UK/ JP price is ~ $350
A reminder that China is adjusting the export number in its balance of payments data by about $200b relative to the customs number on the grounds that the customs price reported by exporters was inflated and way higher than the price they actually received.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31
To state the obvious, a 25% tariff on Mexico and Canada and a 10% tariff on China, if sustained, would be a massive shock -- a much bigger move in one weekend than all the trade action that Trump took in his first term

1/x Image
The just pay it cost of the tariffs on Mexico and Canada would be about 0.8 pp of US GDP (imports are ~ 3.2% of GDP). The just pay it cost is crude, but it usually a pretty good rough guide the actual impact -- as many effects offset.

2/
The 10% tariff on the 1.5% of US GDP that the US still imports from China ($400b or so in the US data) adds another 15 bp of GDP to the total, and brings the total "just pay it cost" up to about 1 pp of US GDP (leaving out retaliation)

3/
Read 10 tweets
Jan 28
One of my favorite charts, which supports the argument that Michael Pettis making -- namely that foreign reserve accumulation drove financial inflows into the US from 2002 to 2014 (but not after!)

1/ Image
Another way to make the point -- for a long period of time, most of the (net) debt inflow that funded the US current account deficit came from foreign governments. (the last ten years though have been different)

2/ Image
The same is true other side of the ledger as well

3/ Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 27
Extraordinary privilege is thrown around a bit too much.

Right now there is extraordinary demand for US bonds, but it isn't coming from reserve managers, China or Japanese institutions ...

1/x Image
Global reserve growth can be tracked, and there isn't much of it right now -- over the past 10 years of dollar strength, reserve accumulation only helped fund the US external deficit in 2020 and 2021.

2/ Image
Just looking at Treasuries, there has been strong foreign demand for them over the past year -- but it almost entirely demand from private investors.

They invest because the US market generally offers a yield pickup over the rest of the G-10 (and China) + better liquidity

3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
Jan 26
Has "the world [moved] on to trade without the US" as Ruchir Sharma seems to claim?

My answer would be a resounding no: yes, there are trade deals that don't touch the US, but the current pattern of global trade only works with the US & its deficit

1/

ft.com/content/07eac5…
Sharma seems to embrace the view of trade of many trade diplomats on the global conference circuit -- namely that it can be defined by free trade agreements (and need not be complicated by looking at the actual way global trade balances)

2/ Image
In reality, though, the world is stuck with the US so long as global trade only balances as a result of the US deficit -- and for now, the US is essential to a world that allows many other to run surpluses, and China to run a large surplus

3/ Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 25
A stat to help explain the world economy.

Since the end of 2018 (before the bulk of Trump's tariffs, before COVID), China imports of manufactures are up $90b, and its exports of manufactures are up $1060b ($1.06 trillion)

1/ Image
That means that China's surplus in manufactures is up close to $1 trillion ($970b) --

It more or less doubled, and the overall good surplus more than doubled, in dollar terms over the last 6 years

2/ Image
as a share of China's GDP, China's customs surplus has more than doubled from its pre-COVID levels ... it is up about 3 pp of China's GDP over the last 5-6 years (and, yes, one should ask why China's current account surplus hasn't moved up by the same amount)

3/ Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(