Brad Setser Profile picture
CFR senior fellow. Views are my own. Retweets are not endorsements. Writes on sovereign debt and capital flows.
Apr 9 5 tweets 2 min read
Before the global financial crisis, in 06 and 07, the US fiscal deficit was under 2 percent of GDP and note issuance was under 1 pp of GDP in 07. That was also the time of peak reserve accumulation Image The low level of US fiscal deficit prior to the global crisis + the small stock of Treasury debt prior to the crisis, especially relative to reserves, are 2 things that many have forgotten; constantly surprised by folks who think US fiscal was an pre crisis issue

2/ Image
Apr 7 21 tweets 6 min read
Happy to see the IMF has noticed the expansion of global current account imbalances --

And guess what, the IMF seems to have rediscovered the idea that currency manipulation can drive imbalances (though manipulation has been renamed "macro-industrial policy" ... )

1/ many Image The IMF doesn't find that "micro" industrial policy has a big impact on global imbalances, only economy wide "macro-industrial policies"

2/
Apr 6 4 tweets 2 min read
"The problem is there was never enough cash to fund all his [Crown Prince MBS] ambitious initiatives."

Indeed. That's why measures lie the balance of payments breakeven are useful. The Saudis needed $90 plus oil -- or near unlimited access to debt financing

1/ Image Going into the current conflict, the Saudis were borrowing $100b a year from the rest of the world (that's a form of reverse petrodollars so to speak)

2/ Image
Apr 3 4 tweets 2 min read
An exploration of the February US trade data -- which got buried a bit by the anniversary of liberation day.

A key question -- will the weakness in non "AI" imports in the last 12ms reverse now that uncertainty around tariff levels has disappeared. Imports of computers are up massively (tho not from China) and show no sign of slowing down -- that will mechanically pull the true trade deficit (setting gold flows aside) w/o a big sustained fall in other imports Image
Apr 3 20 tweets 7 min read
A thread on the February 2026 trade data, with some answers and some questions --

Both nominal imports and nominal exports (ex petrol) are growing again -- with surprising strength in nominal exports and nominal imports back at their end Biden administration levels

1/ Image I think I know why nominal exports look so strong --

One clue is that "real" exports are much weaker (but to be clear still up; the Trump 2 trade war did not lead to retaliation and lower exports)

2/ Image
Apr 1 7 tweets 2 min read
Petrodollar (or lack of them) update:

Saudi 2025 balance of payments data is out, and the Saudi "current account" break even oil price (based on ~ 7 mbd in exports of crude/ product) is still right around $100 a barrel

1/
the current account break even is the oil price where oil exports cover the rest of the current account -- so there is no deficit in the current account

2/ Image
Mar 27 7 tweets 3 min read
As I mentioned on Wednesday, there is a $3 trillion gap between China's accumulated current account surplus since the pandemic and China's unchanged reserves (and a corresponding gap in visible flows into the US)

Bank flows make up most of the difference

1/ Image That was true in q4 -- most of China's foreign bond purchases are done by the banks, so there was $170b or so outflow via the banks in q4 alone. That is about 2/3rds of China's reported q4 current account surplus

2/
Mar 24 5 tweets 2 min read
Three big picture observations about the oil surplus (petrodollars/ petroeuros/ petroequities are all downstream of this) pre Hormuz

A) The oil surplus is modest relative to the surplus in Asia. Chinese state banks and offshore deposits of Chinese exporters are way bigger

1/ Image B) Most oil exporters are in deficit or run only modest surpluses with oil in the 60s or 70s. That importantly includes Saudi Arabia, which now has a BoP break even in the 90s

2/ Image
Mar 23 9 tweets 3 min read
The risk of an escalation in the Gulf seem reduced for at least a few days. So maybe there will be a bit of interest in my (somewhat novel) reevaluation of the relative contribution of Europe and China to global imbalances

1/

cfr.org/articles/time-… Bottom line: The second China shock has eliminated Europe's imbalance -- it all migrated to the east.

Consider the contribution of net exports to Chinese growth and to German growth over the last few years ...

2/ Image
Mar 22 25 tweets 7 min read
Petrodollars! Nothing produces more heated discussion and, in my experience, less insight. Myths trump facts, because the actual data is a bit obscure --

But here is the most important thing to know. Before the Hormuz crisis, the flow of petrodollars had more or less dried up

1/manyImage At $60-70 a barrel, the oil exporters just weren't generating large surpluses --

Saudi Arabia's external deficit offset Russia's surplus, so the two biggest oil exporters (~ 15mbd of exports together) were not generating petrodollars, petroeuros or petroyuan

2/ Image
Mar 16 8 tweets 3 min read
Back before the bombardment of Iran, China's currency was under considerable appreciation pressure -- the settlement data showed $70b in fx purchases by the PBOC/ SCBs ($840b annualized). A huge sum for a holiday month ...

1/ Image Over the last 12ms of data, settlement (my preferred intervention measure) shows purchases of $500-600b ... or more than enough to trigger the Treasury "manipulation" thresholds

2/ Image
Mar 3 6 tweets 2 min read
Some basic oil shock math, focusing on the impact on global trade ...

Remember that we are starting from an unusually low surplus in the fuel exporting economies ...

1/ Image And also an unusually large surplus in East Asia.

Core east Asia looks to (per the old BP data) import ~ 20 mbd on net, so each $10b/ barrel change in the oil price reduces East Asia goods surplus by ~ $75b

2/ Image
Feb 26 10 tweets 4 min read
A day that was a long time coming -- TSMC's dominance of chip manufacturing led Taiwan to post a $70b quarterly current account surplus in q4. That is $280b annualized, or a surplus of ~ 33% of GDP

Never though that would be possible for a non-tax haven without oil

1/ Image And there is of course a capital flows story -- as the TWD depreciated in q4 in the face of this massive surplus (2x its level in 24), and Taiwan technically sold reserves too!

2/ Image
Feb 26 17 tweets 5 min read
I actually don't think Mark and I are that far apart

(tho I wouldn't start by arguing that a BoP deficit is meaningless, as I certainly find value in some cuts of the balance of payments + get annoyed when the IMF ignores the components of the BoP)

1/ The most policy relevant question is whether the courts will strike down the 122 balance of payments tariffs & I think the answer to that is likely to be no, for the reasons that Peter Harrell (an actual lawyer) laid out today

2/

lawfaremedia.org/article/are-tr…
Feb 25 22 tweets 6 min read
This is a thread that only Adam Tooze, a few international economist and a couple of very well paid trade lawyers are likely to enjoy …

The basic question is what did Congress mean back in 1975 when they wrote about payments problems and balance of payments deficits

1/ Image It is clear from the Senate report on the legislation that the authors were concerned about trade and payments surplus countries (Germany and Japan at the time) & the equitable sharing of balance of payments adjustment responsibilities across surplus and deficit countries

2/ Image
Feb 24 6 tweets 2 min read
The mandarins at the PBOC are in a difficult spot -- a faster pace of CNY appreciation against the dollar has convinced Chinese exporters to bring funds back home, and driven the need to buy $100b a month (give or take) to control the pace of appreciation ...

1/ Image What's more, the slightly faster pace of appreciation v the dollar only drives an appreciation in the inflation adjusted CNY if the dollar itself isn't depreciating v other currencies, and if the pace of appreciation is bigger than the inflation differential

2/
Feb 24 8 tweets 3 min read
Great story in the New York Times highlighting the difficulties that the US government has faced in getting the world's most profitable companies to take supply chain security seriously, and reduce their exposure to a crisis in the Taiwan straights

1/ Image Seems like the median outcome for the US is that the efforts of Biden (CHIPS act) and Trump ("deals" negotiated with the threat of semiconductor tariffs) will just keep the US share of global chip production stable.

2/

nytimes.com/2026/02/24/tec…
Feb 24 13 tweets 5 min read
Me, in the Financial Times --

On the surge in China's intervention, and the impossibility of diversifying away from dollar assets/ Treasuries when the state banks are buying $100b a month in FX

1/ Image A statement from the heart --

The narrative around Treasury diversification that took hold after the Bloomberg story was a red herring. The real story was that Chinese intervention has surged and reached unprecedented levels

2/ Image
Feb 23 8 tweets 3 min read
Striking how much of a drag net exports have been to German growth since the pandemic ...

1/ Image Obviously, this is because Germany's once substantial exports of autos, aircraft and machinery to China have plummeted. Those sectors used to generate a substantial surplus for Germany -- but not any more

2/ Image
Feb 22 28 tweets 7 min read
So does the US have a balance of payments deficit for purposes of section 122 of the trade law (and thus the basis for imposing a 15% tariff).

It is an interesting question

1/ many Image One meaning of a balance of payments deficit is a current account deficit in excess of financial inflows, and thus a draw on reserves -- something that happens in emerging economies, but not generally in advanced economies with floating exchange rates.

2/
Feb 20 11 tweets 2 min read
The Trump administration is sure to use other authorities (122 maybe, 232, 301) to raise tariffs now that the court has struck down the IEEPA tariffs.

But striking down IEEPA still matters, particularly for China/other countries that aren't heavily hit by existing 232s

1/
Consider the structure of Korea's trade with the US v that of China. Korea export a ton of autos, which are still subject to the 232 auto tariff. Its steel is still subject to the 232 tariff there. & its chip exports could potentially be targeted by the semiconductor 232. 2/