(also: let this be your periodic reminder that Donald Trump has been encouraging violence against his political opponents for years, and the media has largely ignored this.)
Here is Donald Trump, who has been encouraging violence against his political opponents for years, again encouraging violence against his political opponents.
Donald Trump is spending the last days of the election encouraging his followers to violently prevent his opponents from campaigning. @jack@TwitterSupport why do you allow this?
Trump has been regularly inciting violence by his supporters against his political opponents since before he took office, and our political, media, economic, and academic elites have rarely talked about it, to their eternal discredit.
This is idiotic. You know damn well Joe Biden is going to get more votes than Donald Trump.
There are a lot of people who like Trump and other bad things. There are more people who dislike them. It is an idiotic lie to say that equals “a Trump country.”
This is extremely dumb. Donald Trump has twice run for president and twice gotten fewer votes than his opponent; his approval has never been above 50 for a day of his presidency. His supporters are a minority of Americans. There are too many of them, but it is not their country.
Democrats have won more votes in 7 of the last 8 presidential elections, so I would suggest that perhaps the people who need to get out of their bubble and spend more time with real voters are the right-wing pundits who think America is a center-right country.
Something that isn’t properly understood (particularly among journalists) is that The Right spent hundreds of millions of dollars and decades creating a facade of intellectualism and a key part of that was marketing nitwit partisans as “brilliant..”
And a lot of journalists were active participants in this, both because they got suckered by dumb arguments and because praising the intelligence/seriousness of this right-wing faux intellectuals was a easy way to demonstrate their own seriousness and “objectivity”
Barrett was nominated by a president who lost the popular vote, confirmed by a Senate majority that represents fewer people than the Senate minority, and gives the Supreme Court a majority of members who were appointed by presidents who took office after losing the popular vote.
John Roberts wrote the decision gutting the Voting Rights Act.
When people act like that doesn’t matter, they’re showing you who they are.
And it isn't just the Voting Rights Act -- though that would be enough. John Roberts is a right-wing judge. Here's a piece from @AaronBelkin and @SeanMcElwee last year explaining:
Also, there is a *huge* difference between "having countermajoritarian capacity" and being dominated for 50 years (and decades to come) by America's minority party.
This is the right's "we must have tyranny of the minority in order to prevent tyranny of the majority" BS.
Better headline: “Trump tries to steal election by preventing Pennsylvanians from voting.”
It’s just really weird to frame an article about the possibly that voter suppression leads to a result opposed by most people as a question of whether polls will fail to account for suppression.
“Boss, it looks like Trump is trying to suppress enough votes to steal the election!”
“Oh my god this is a huge story —quick, write an article about whether polls will appear to have been wrong!”