In October last year, after I won the Prorogation case and whilst I was litigating the Benn Act case, a dormant company which had carried out building works for me three years previously sued me for some £500,000.
The dormant company, EA Chiverton Limited, repeatedly refused to say who is funding the (considerable) costs of that litigation. Today, after releasing details of the Government's procurement practices, I received an enquiry from the Daily Mail about the litigation.
I don't know whether the litigation is politically motivated but the Claimant's conduct of the litigation, and the timing of this enquiry, are difficult to understand. The Daily Mail tells me "there is nothing odd about it."
I am winding down my paid private practice to focus purely on public interest work and resigned from Chambers some weeks back. To meet the huge costs of defending the litigation, which I believe to be without merit, I have sold the property in question.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jo Maugham QC

Jo Maugham QC Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JolyonMaugham

30 Oct
Embedded in this decision is an assertion that the question 'should one discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, or sexual preference, or gender identity?' is one that requires balance, one on which reasonable people can disagree. theguardian.com/media/2020/oct…
Decisions like this - which implicitly legitimise racism or homophobia or transphobia - are one reason why I hope the Labour Party finds its focus, and quickly. The country is changing before our eyes, and not for the better.
Personal take. The BBC (in common with much of our media, including, shamefully, the Guardian) has a number of transphobes in its editorial structure. The efforts of those transphobes to institutionalise their prejudice is landing the BBC in all sorts of legal hot water.
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct
We need to talk about isolation suits - also known as "coveralls". THREAD
Experimental data shows that during the pandemic we have used 533,000 coveralls using the emergency procurement procedure that bypasses all normal governance controls. But how many have we purchased? gov.uk/government/pub…
Well, it's rather difficult to tell. If you add together the eleven biggest contracts for coveralls - and I'll return to these below - you can see we've spent a total of £708m on them. But Government has done a very careful job of redacting the per unit price.
Read 19 tweets
22 Oct
Short thread about @GoodLawProject and Uber. THREAD
Way back in April 2017, we announced we were going to take on HMRC's failure to assess Uber to VAT "tens or hundreds of millions of pounds every year" which corroded public trust in HMRC and the establishment generally. crowdjustice.com/case/uber/
It's been quite a scrap.

There have been lows - like us spending all the money we raised in the crowdfunder trying to get a protective costs order - and failing. bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/…
Read 9 tweets
22 Oct
One of the contracts that Government finally published last week was this £168.5m contract with tiny pest control specialist Pestfix for three different types of facemasks. atamis-1928.cloudforce.com/sfc/p/#0O00000…
Now, you may have wondered whether it was wise to spend a third of a billion with such a company (with five contracts illegally remaining unpublished). And you may not find justifications like this ('the director's wife is a vet and has family in China') especially compelling.
I mean, if you put facemasks into the NHS or care homes and they were faulty, people could die, right?

So you would have been dismayed to see that in August Pestfix admitted supplying duff FFP3 facemasks, one of the types supplied to the NHS under the £168.5m contract.
Read 7 tweets
21 Oct
I notice Ayanda's website accuses me of "fabricating" claims that the FFP2 masks did not meet the required technical standards.
Here is what the Government’s own lawyers - does Ayanda accuse them of "fabricating" evidence too - say about the facemasks Ayanda supplied.
Ayanda's website links to a test report on mask samples. But that report is totally meaningless. Ayanda's own contract with Government says (and you may wonder why) that what Ayanda delivers to Governmeny does not have to match those samples (contractsfinder.service.gov.uk/Notice/Attachm…).
Read 4 tweets
20 Oct
Small quibbles aside (of which there are a number), I rather agree with this open letter. A study of 'cause lawyering' in the United States points to the dangers of elevating the power of judges above those of politicians. thetimes.co.uk/article/the-la…
Quibble 1. No one in the UK is (presently) asserting that the rule of law triumphs over Parliamentary Sovereignty. There are contexts in which we might have that discussion but the Internal Market Bill is not amongst them.
Quibble 2. That our constitution (usually) ranks Parliamentary Sovereignty above the rule of law does not mean the Internal Market Bill is a good idea. It just means that (generally) it's better for those with a democratic mandate to make choices rather than those without one.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!