You might be thinking that there is a national effort to track how schools are reopening in person so we can reopen as many as possible safely.

There is not.

Betsy DeVos dropped the ball on this and @SenWarren and I are pushing back. Here's how. [THREAD]
Quick background: Last week, Betsy DeVos was asked why a national system doesn't exist. Her response?

“I'm not sure there's a role at the department to collect and compile that research.”

The dewonkified translation: “I don’t believe in doing it."
This position is good news for DeVos, she gets to do less work. For everyone else, it means we’re in the dark about outbreaks in schools and best practices to reopening safely.

@SenWarren and I are on the same page about this, so let’s talk how to make this situation better.
To start with, let's start tracking how many cases are linked to schools and what safeguards schools are putting in place to reopen.

That means coordinating with state and local governments to help with the great work that many are already doing.
This also means creating national reporting standards so it is possible to make comparisons.

Think how much easier it would be for your kids’ school to make decisions if they knew what health protocols work best and could compare their situation with others across the country.
If this sounds like an obvious step to you, that's because it is.

Check out what @SenWarren and I wrote to DeVos, you can read our full letter at the link below. It explains what all this means in more detail:

smithsenate.box.com/shared/static/…
As far as I see it, DeVos has a choice here, she can choose to do her job or not.

If she wants schools to reopen in person safely, then she should be working with the Education Department to make it happen. Anything else is an abdication of duty.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Senator Tina Smith

Senator Tina Smith Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SenTinaSmith

3 Aug
Today I’m announcing my bill to legalize marijuana.

Here’s a bit more about what is in the bill and how we can do this while protecting the health, safety, and civil rights of our communities: [THREAD]
First off, federal marijuana prohibition is a failed policy, and the public overwhelmingly supports legalization. 42 states and DC already allow some degree of marijuana use.
Second, if we legalize, we need to do it the right way.

In addition to passing @SenKamalaHarris’s MORE Act to expunge marijuana-related convictions and reinvest in communities harmed by the War on Drugs, we need to ensure legal marijuana is safe, regulated, and well-researched.
Read 7 tweets
5 Feb
(1/4) I thank Duluth Mayor Emily Larson for being my guest at the #SOTU. Mayor Larson has been a strong leader on housing & health care, and we have worked together to increase access to affordable housing and make health care, and especially prescription drugs, more affordable.
(2/4) The number one issue I hear about from Minnesotans is the high cost of health care, and skyrocketing prescription drug prices.
(3/4) Tonight President Trump talked about bringing health care costs down, but at the same time his administration is fighting in court to repeal the Affordable Care Act, kick people off of health insurance, and take away protections for people with pre-existing conditions.
Read 4 tweets
31 Jan
(1/4) Impeachment trial day 9. Woke up this morning after about 4 hours of sleep, & all I could think about was what happened yesterday. Was breathtaking to watch President’s defenders transform completely from saying President did nothing wrong to President can do nothing wrong.
(2/4) We have a few more hours of questions—we’ve had over 13 hours. I hope for a little more insight after another long day. Everyone is looking ahead to the discussion tomorrow of witnesses.
(3/4) For me, it’s clear: why would anyone in the Senate vote against witnesses, only to find out later what Bolton knows about what really happened? That would be hard to explain to your grandchildren. The truth always comes out.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jan
(1/5) Today is Day #6. It’s been a second day of hearing from the President’s lawyers. A couple things stand out:
(2/5) Was surreal to see Kenneth Starr review history and precedent of impeachment. One of his points was that we have been in what he called an age of impeachment that we should leave behind. Not a lot of irony in his presentation, given his lead role in the Clinton impeachment.
(3/5) It was also surreal to have no discussion at all of the big news this weekend, that Bolton in his manuscript apparently makes it clear that the President did want an investigation into the Bidens and the 2016 election in exchange for releasing the aid.
Read 5 tweets
25 Jan
(1/6) Day #5 was a short day, just two hours of presentation from the President’s lawyers. After the session I went up to the gallery with my colleagues Tammy Duckworth, Jeff Merkley, and Leader Chuck Schumer to do a quick press response to the proceedings.
(2/6) After three days of comprehensive, thorough review of the facts and evidence from the House Managers, the President’s lawyers tried to to poke holes in the House Managers’ arguments.
(3/6) What was interesting to me is how their presentation makes the case even stronger for why this trial needs witnesses and the documents.
Read 6 tweets
24 Jan
Little more than halfway through Day #3. The Senate Chaplin began his opening prayer by urging us not just to hear but to also practice empathetic attentiveness. & to remember our friendships in the Senate. The Chaplin can always be counted on to appeal to our higher principles.
The House managers provided an excellent review of the constitutional rationale, history and precedent for impeachment for a President’s abuse of power. Even my colleagues with law degrees found it fascinating and full of good information.
The White House lawyers argue in their 171-page brief that abuse of power is not impeachable. Let’s just say it’s hard to find a legal expert to support their position. But we’ll learn more about that when they begin their presentation.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!