We appreciate the voices on the city council who spoke up in opposition to yesterday's homeless criminalization motion. It has been a long fight to get councilmembers to acknowledge the harm caused by over-policing houseless people.
They questioned the urgency of this motion, and why that same urgency hasn't been present in efforts to house people. They acknowledged that arrests and sweeps make it harder for people to connect to the few services we do have available.
Importantly, they also acknowledged that enforcement strategies have already been tried, and they've consistently failed. We need to put real resources behind programs that work. Stop letting pilot programs languish. Stop focusing on shiny new things and get creative.
We can't keep having this fight. Continuing to push enforcement and criminalization is a distraction from the solutions we actually need. It pits housed and unhoused people against each other, and treats arrests and trauma as a reward for angry neighbors.
City council needs to be honest with the callers who were angry about the consequences of homelessness. Arrests won't get trash off the street, but providing bins and dumpsters will. Arrests won't give anyone access to a bathroom. These are just symptoms of a much bigger failure.
The fundamental problem is that people don't have a home to live in. Until we fix that, everything else is just a mitigation strategy. We can provide street services that acknowledge and address these issues. What we can't do is arrest our way out of it.
We hope the councilmembers who spoke up yesterday will continue to uplift real solutions while opposing motions that punish people for having no place to go.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The majority of council did not support the motion and sent it back to committee. This fight will come back, but public pressure stopped the council from moving forward today. Jamming this through in just a few days during a busy election season failed.
As the meeting closed, they moved to continue this discussion on November 24th, so this fight is far from over. We need to keep the pressure on council, because they will try this again in 4 weeks.
Thanks to everyone who called, emailed, and otherwise spoke out against this backwards motion. In a matter of days, the people spoke up and shut it down. Criminalization is not a solution to homelessness. #HomesNotZones#ServicesNotSweeps
Today, City Council will discuss a measure creating a partnership with St. Vincent’s Medical Center to provide services to low-income and unhoused Angelenos. This feels like a great measure and we support expanded services, but we can't ignore the troubling connections behind it.
St. Vincent is owned by LA Times owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong who bought it in 2018. As it went bankrupt in 2020, the LA Times provided significant coverage of the hospital’s closure, including a column by Lopez calling on the City to turn the facility into homeless housing. 2/9
Next up, Steve Lopez. Lopez writes frequently on issues of homelessness in Los Angeles. Too often however, his depictions of homelessness tend towards the sensational and dehumanizes the unhoused. 3/9 la.streetsblog.org/2019/11/23/hom…
Good morning - we're here at the Convening on the Justice Guarantee in San Francisco, hosted by @Justice_Collab and organized by @ChatfieldKate.
Very excited for a day discussing criminalization, housing, and structural racism in the justice system. Stay tuned for highlights!
The convening is at Manny's, which offers a nicely curated collection of books in addition to some excellent grub.
Opening remarks from @ChatfieldKate. 2.2 million incarcerated people and hundreds of thousands of unhoused people need a Justice Guarantee rooted in dignity. "We must move away from the false narrative that jails and prisons are the answer."
Our members have been calling @MitchOFarrell's office and asking important questions about the upcoming sweeps at Echo Park. We've learned that CD13 shelters are currently at capacity. Police are about to remove dozens of people from the area with no plan as to where they'll go.
When members spoke to staffers, they gave confusing and contradictory information about where to direct people. Suggested shelters were far away and inaccessible to people in the Echo Park area.
In just the past few weeks we've seen a major uptick in anti-homeless enforcement actions, and extreme confusion among the city employees doing the enforcement. The city is pushing practices that make unhoused people's lives more difficult, and they're doing it incompetently.