This decision is INSANE. By a 2–1 vote, the 8th Circuit rules the Minnesota Secretary of State and the Minnesota state courts unconstitutionally usurped power from the state legislature by extending the ballot deadline. That theory was too extreme for the Bush v. Gore majority!
THIS IS THE DECISION I HAVE BEEN WARNING ABOUT FOR WEEKS. There is NO Supreme Court precedent to back up the 8th Circuit. This is a radical made-up theory Republicans are using to prevent states from counting ballots! THIS IS DANGEROUS FUCKING TERRITORY! slate.com/news-and-polit…
You need to pay attention to what's going on right now. The federal judiciary is dramatically expanding its power to police state election laws, to stop state courts and governors and election boards from protecting voting rights and counting ballots. slate.com/news-and-polit…
On the eve of the 2020 election, Republican lawyers and conservative judges are reviving the most sinister argument in Bush v. Gore, the one that even Kennedy and O'Connor couldn't accept. And they just won! A decision that would be unthinkable MONTHS ago! slate.com/news-and-polit…
It's as if Bush v. Gore hid in a cave for 20 years, then as soon as RBG died, jumped out to subvert this election. All of these cases are the same: States want to count ballots. They want to count every vote. And FEDERAL JUDGES are telling them they cannot.slate.com/news-and-polit…
🚨VOTERS IN NORTH CAROLINA, MINNESOTA, AND PENNSYLVANIA: DO NOT MAIL YOUR BALLOTS. DROP THEM OFF IN PERSON.

The far-right arm of the federal judiciary has its knives out for ballots mailed by Election Day that arrive shortly thereafter, even in states that WANT to count them.
The brazen partisanship of this decision from top to bottom is profoundly unsettling.
If SCOTUS doesn’t stay this batshit 8th Circuit decision (and GOP power-grab) attempting to throw out VALID mail ballots, after repeatedly reversing lower courts that change election laws, it will be exhibit A in the case for court reform.

Also possibly Barrett’s first vote.
If SCOTUS doesn’t stay this decision, I think it will radicalize a lot of centristy types who’ve resisted calls for court reform thus far. It is incredibly dangerous and lawless. A blatant partisan power grab of the type I used to think I’d never see in this country. Jesus.
And there is no way two partisan judges on the 8th Circuit would’ve tried to get away with this if RBG were alive. They are brazenly testing SCOTUS’ limits. We’re going to see a lot more of this from the Trump-dominated lower courts soon, too.
If you want to hear more about this insane decision, turn on CNN right now. @rickhasen has you covered.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mark Joseph Stern

Mark Joseph Stern Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mjs_DC

31 Oct
Texas Republicans have asked a federal judge to throw out 100,000 ballots in Harris County cast through curbside voting. They drew Judge Andrew Hanen, one of the most notoriously partisan Republican judges in the entire federal judiciary. This is alarming. assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2040…
Judge Hanen has already scheduled an emergency hearing for Monday morning—without even giving Harris County a chance to file a response brief. This, too, is extremely concerning. It looks like he may be rushing to throw out 100,000 disproportionately Democratic votes.
Texas Republicans are deploying the theory—recently endorsed by Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh—that only state legislatures have authority over elections. Because the Harris County Clerk implemented drive-through voting, Republicans say all 100,000 ballots must be tossed.
Read 7 tweets
30 Oct
Why is there so much more backlash to GOP voter suppression this year? My working theory is that Republicans made a mistake by launching a blatant effort to throw out valid mail ballots. There's no plausible deniability about "fraud"; they're just openly trying to steal votes.
Previously, Republicans pushed stringent voter ID rules, cuts to early voting, and other, more subtle attempts to keep people from casting a ballot—justified by fear of "voter fraud" (which isn't real). Now the plausible deniability is gone. It's just open season on lawful votes.
Also, the Bush v. Gore trick works best *after* an election. Republicans are scrambling to tee up Bush v. Gore 2.0, which means voters KNOW how they intend to nullify ballots, and can avoid the trap. Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas didn't help by saying "yes! we're ready!"
Read 4 tweets
29 Oct
By a 5–1 vote, the Florida Supreme Court overturns a whole line of precedent that limited the death penalty to "the most aggravated and the least mitigated of first-degree murders."

The decision sets back Florida's death penalty jurisprudence by decades. floridasupremecourt.org/content/downlo…
This decision is a HUGE deal. The Florida Supreme Court has long reviewed death sentences for proportionality. But five conservative justices just decided they didn't like that rule, so they tossed it out the window. An earthquake in Florida's criminal justice system.
To see the future of our federal judiciary, just take a look at the Florida Supreme Court. Republicans have now stacked it with a 6–1 conservative majority ... which promptly gave itself the power to overturn decades of precedent. A massive power-grab. slate.com/news-and-polit…
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
By a 5–3 vote, the Supreme Court has refused to stop Pennsylvania from counting ballots that are mailed by Election Day but arrive up to three days later. Alito dissents, joined by Thomas and Gorsuch. Read it: supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
Note: Amy Coney Barrett did not participate in this decision, but she did NOT recuse herself. She simply decided that she joined too late to participate.
This statement is a clear indication that, while Amy Coney Barrett didn't participate this time, she will NOT recuse herself from future election litigation.
Read 5 tweets
28 Oct
I am still stuck on Brett Kavanaugh claiming states “want to be able to definitively announce the results of the election on election night.” No state definitively announces the results on election night. None. How can it be that Kavanaugh doesn’t understand basic election law?
In 2018, putative liberals like Lisa Blatt and Akhil Amar assured us that Kavanaugh was brilliant, a genius, one of the finest legal minds of the nation. But these claims are impossible to square with Kavanaugh’s work on the court. It’s bizarre! slate.com/news-and-polit…
Roberts? Super smart guy. Alito? Basically an evil genius. Gorsuch? He can drive me nuts but the brainpower is obvious. Thomas? His fans overstate his intellect but his detractors underestimate it; he is often a very original thinker.

But Kavanaugh is just thoroughly mediocre!
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct
Holy shit—Brett Kavanaugh just endorsed Rehnquist's concurrence in Bush v. Gore, which was too extreme for Kennedy or O'Connor.

This is a red alert. I can't believe he put it in a footnote. This is terrifying. assets.documentcloud.org/documents/7276…
The headline news here is that, by a 5–3 vote, SCOTUS made it harder for Wisconsin residents to cast a ballot and make sure it's counted.

But arguably the bigger news is that Brett Kavanaugh endorsed a theory so radical that the court refused to adopt it in Bush v. Gore. My God.
This is VERY BAD NEWS for voting rights. Appallingly bad. Brett Kavanaugh used a footnote to throw his support behind an extreme theory that would severely limit state courts' ability to protect voting rights. It's the revenge of Bush. v. Gore. Actually, it's much worse.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!