There's a narrative that sometimes people get so excited about their Palestine activism and their principled objection to Zionism that they get "carried away" and drift into antisemitism. I think that's wrong. /1
Whatever your position on Palestine/Israel, there's no reason why you would "drift into" antisemitic terrain if you weren't there already, or if it did not appeal to you in the first place. It's true that we do encounter antisemitism among some Palestine activism.... 2/
... for two reasons IMO: there are some (not many) people who are driven by antisemitism and use Palestine activism as a cover. It's easy to recognise these types and to see through them, they care very little about Palestine and actual Palestinians. 3/
More common are cases where some people, not necessarily in conscious manner, invoke antisemitic tropes when discussing Israel/Palestine. They do so because antisemitism is such a rich reservoir of metaphors with wide resonance in Western culture. 4/
So it is easy to draw upon this "reservoir", sometimes without understanding, as explained so well in this piece, which I will not tire of promoting 5/
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
Antisemitic tropes are attractive because they offer easy, simple narratives of black and white, and in this case because they offload the British legacy of colonialism onto others: a powerful lobby, evil conspiracy, rich bankers, ruthless Zionists. NOT US. THEM. 6/
(for anyone familiar with British Imperial history, to present the Balfour Declaration as a unique and inexplicable aberration or error, achieved by an evil lobby, is an utter joke. I mean carving up territories and moving people around was what the Empire did) 7/
The problem is not with Palestine activism or one's enthusiasm about it. The problem is antisemitism, the general prevalence and ubiquity of antisemitic metaphors and antisemitic ways of thinking in this society.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yair Wallach

Yair Wallach Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @YairWallach

30 Oct
The EHRC report is a vindication of the struggle of Jewish activists who rightly called the Labour party on antisemitism. But it couldn't have been won without the struggles for equality of other minorities - let's not forget this. Thread:
1/
The EHRC report vindicates many Labour members and activists who consistently argued that Labour had a serious problem on Antisemitism, and that the party failed to deal with it.
2/
Yes: there was a political weaponising and media fetishism of Jews. But there were also Jewish activists who had to deal with unacceptable levels harassment and discrimination. And that's what counts. Read accounts here 3/
Read 10 tweets
29 Oct
If you say that "of course there is antisemitism in the Labour party, as part of society" but there is no track record of you speaking out clearly against *specific* examples of that problem, then it's difficult to take seriously your views on the matter. /1
Without such track record, it is difficult to understand what you think does or does not count as antisemitism. And yes it's not always obvious. So it is important to understand what for you is a clear case, black and white, example that you think needs calling out. /2
Without such track record, it's difficult to determine that you actually care about this issue. We can all make platitudes. We are all against racism. At least everybody says they are. But without reference to real life examples, it's meaningless. /3
Read 5 tweets
7 Oct
Was the Oslo agreement designed to achieve permanent Israeli occupation over the West Bank and Gaza, to prevent meaningful Palestinian sovereignty, and foil a meaningful two state solution?

(A thread)
Critics of Oslo have long argued that the agreement was a charade, which was never going to end Israeli occupation. These arguments were made forcefully during the recent debate on Rabin's legacy, amid the controversy over AOC's cancelled talk. 2/
This piece by @aj_iraqi, concludes that "Oslo was never derailed by Rabin’s death — it achieved exactly what Rabin had set out to do." ... "a cloak of “peace” to disguise the next stage of colonial rule". 3/
972mag.com/yitzhak-rabin-…
Read 17 tweets
21 Aug
I want to explain something that perhaps isn't clear to some people.
Jews deported to Auschwitz were told they were sent to a work camp. The "Arbeit Macht Frei" was part of that deception. The sign pretended to say "work hard and you'll survive". But this was a lie.
1/
The sign was part of Nazi deceptive measures designed to ensure Jews arriving to the camps by deportation trains do not riot and cooperate, to get them to obey to the instructions they were given, and to get them to the gas chambers in a quick and orderly manner. 2/
So what the sign says is genocide. Not exploitation, not some "work the poor" ideology. The sign, in its distorted use by the Nazis, says mass murder of people because of their race. Using it in any other context or meaning is disrespectful to the victims. 3/
Read 5 tweets
7 Jul
So, @PeterBeinart endorses binationalism and imagines a future for liberal Zionism beyond Jewish statehood.
This is an important piece. I'll outline what I see as its strengths and weaknesses. THREAD
jewishcurrents.org/yavne-a-jewish…
First the strengths. Beinart acknowledges that decades of Israeli policies and settlement expansion have made Palestinian statehood all but impossible. The two state solution is dead, and the choice is between a quasi-Apartheid system and democracy. Beinart chooses democracy.

2/
This is important in a reality where most mainstream Jewish organisations (who try their best to pretend the question isn't there) are effectively saying "if the Jewish state has to look like Apartheid, so be it".

3/
Read 28 tweets
25 Jun
If you, a white English person, are talking about the systemic racism as a global issue, and the only example you come up with is "Israeli secret services taught US police how to kill black people", then it doesn't sound like you want to understand global systemic racism 1/
Not transatlantic slavery. Not Diego Garcia. Not the Iraq war. Not refugees drowning in the Med. Not the disproportional effect of COVID on black people in US and UK. No, it's Israeli secret services teaching US police how to kill black people. 2/
Let's call it for what it is: Shifting the blame. Abjection. Self-cleansing. Self exculpation. "It's not us." This horrible racism thing comes from somewhere else. From some other people. Israel. The Jews. 3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!