1. There is no "media blackout" of the Hunter Biden story, his alleged laptop or Tony Bobulinski.
The problem is the story makes absolutely no sense.
Follow along if interested.
2. The core issue is that even if every email from the laptop is legitimate and everything Tony Bobulinski alleges is true, it does not prove any wrongdoing by Biden.
That's why its not a story.
3. Tony Bobulinski is not a "business partner" of Hunter Biden. He was discussing business with Hunter Biden and the business fell through. He is CEO of a company that never did any business and is worth nothing.
4. Even if Bobulinski had done business with Hunter Biden (he didn't) and even if Joe Biden was involved (he wasn't, according to corporate records) it would not be a scandal.
After leaving the White House, George W. Bush gave paid speeches in China
5. Was George W. Bush "trading on his name" to extract cash from China. Yes. But that is not really a scandal after leaving office.
Again, there is absolutely no evidence Biden did this.
But it just shows that the entire narrative is very flimsy.
6. The gift to Trump and his allies was Facebook and Twitter's incompetent response to this story. Their platforms are optimized to spread misinformation. So they made a lot of noise about reducing the spread of this story, not wanting a 2016 repeat.
But there was no coherence.
7. Facebook said it was reducing the spread of the story pending a fact check but the story got massive distribution on the platform and was never fact-checked
Twitter banned sharing the link and then reversed, giving it more attention than it deserved
8. Let me add also that it was clear well before this that Hunter Biden acted unethically during the Obama administration. He was trying to trade on his name for cash. But he's a 50-year-old man. It does not tell you anything about Joe Biden.
9. I personally don't feel any need to "ignore" the Hunter Biden story. I've been following it quite closely. But there is just nothing there. It's a fever dream of Rudy Giuliani and Bannon. If someone has evidence otherwise, I'm all ears.
10. If you like this thread, you might like my newsletter.
People also aren’t required to publish your terrible opinions in prominent publications and corporations aren required to pay to run ads alongside your terrible options
Broad social acceptance is not a constitutional right and has nothing to do with freedom of speech
Your critics have just as much right to freedom of speech as you do. They also have the right to organize against you. These rights are just as important as anyone's right to say dumb stuff. A right I also support.
1. @Amazon donated $41,533.71 to the nation's leading source of vaccine misinformation, the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), according to documents obtained exclusively by Popular Information
@amazon 2. The money was donated to NVIC by @Amazon through @AmazonSmile, a program where Amazon donates 0.5% of purchases to a United States non-profit of their choice.
Amazon excludes certain non-profits for various reasons, by NVIC is included.
@amazon@amazonsmile 3. The money donated to non-profits by @amazon is usually not public. But a volunteer for NVIC published the data to VaxCalc Forum, a password-protected message board for the anti-vaccine movement
This person is not a hero. As Chief of Staff at DHS, he played a critical role in the family separation policy, which he didn't even bother to mention in his anonymous op-ed. Instead he choose to milk his status as an "anonymous" member of the Trump administration to sell books.
A few days ago, Taylor said the reason the Trump administration couldn't find the parents of 545 migrant children was that their parents didn't want them
These were children who were separated by Trump administration policy that he helped administer
(He deleted the tweet.)
While these kids are without their parents, Taylor has parlayed his position in the Trump administration into a gig with Google, a contract with CNN, and a book deal
2. The original statement by Cawthorn's campaign was: "He quit his academia job in Boston to work for non-white males, like Cory Booker, who aims to ruin white males running for office."
The campaign has previously said this was a "syntax error" but never explained.
3. Now, Cawthorn's spokesperson says the line should have read: "He quit his academia job in Boston to work for non-white males, like Cory Booker, AND aims to ruin white males running for office."