WATCH: Former DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was asked if @CBP was limiting the capacity to process asylum seekers in front of Congress in December 2018.
She lied.
She denied the agency had made changes to limit capacity. New reports show the agency was doing the opposite.
This revelation was exposed in an @DHSOIG report—but it wasn’t the only alarming find. Here are the other incredibly disturbing conclusions about @CBP’s actions.
CBP officials lied to asylum seekers and others to turn them back to Mexico without processing their claims.
Officials would tell them the port of entry was at capacity and did not have the capability to process them, regardless of actual capacity and capability at the time.
CBP officers at four different ports of entry turned back to Mexico asylum seekers who were already in the United States—even though U.S. law and DHS guidance specifically forbid this.
CBP officers left holding space at two different ports empty while there were lines of asylum seekers and others waiting in Mexico to be processed.
CBP declined to follow OIG’s guidance to continue processing asylum seekers and others at ports where CBP outright stopped processing all asylum seekers without following proper procedure.
Instead, they would send them (through Mexico) to other ports—sometimes 30+ miles away.
This OIG report confirms many of the arguments the Council and its partners @AlOtroLado_Org, @splcenter, @theCCR and Mayer Brown LLP have been making in a lawsuit filed in 2017 challenging the turning back of asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border.
Our litigation team just finished our closing arguments in our case challenging inhumane and unconstitutional conditions in U.S. Border Patrol detention centers in Arizona’s Tucson Sector.
Here’s what happened during the course of the seven-day trial. ⬇️
A federal judge heard from experts who testified on the inadequate medical care and severe conditions inside Tucson Sector facilities.
Another witness summarized gov't data that showed prolonged detention in these facilities, which are intended only for short-term confinement.
The judge also heard from two witnesses previously held in CBP’s Tucson Sector facilities.
One witness described very cold and filthy conditions and stated she was not provided with any personal hygiene items or medical attention for an infected wound.
THREAD: Our Advocacy Manager just arrived back from the secretive tent immigration courts in Laredo Port.
Here are 5 major concerns we observed.
1. Advocates and attorneys are only being allowed into one hearing room.
There are multiple other courtrooms that remain closed off to the public. This violates DOJ regulations requiring immigration hearings to generally be open to the public.
2. Attorneys and others continue to be denied access to observing individual merits hearings, even where the immigrant consents to their presence.
THREAD: Why don't undocumented immigrants just get in line? Because no “line” is available for the vast majority of them. (1/6)
Immigration to the United States on a temporary or permanent basis is generally limited to three different routes: employment, family reunification, or humanitarian protection. (2/6)
Each of these possibilities is highly regulated and subject to numerical limitations and eligibility requirements. As a result, most unauthorized immigrants do not have the necessary family or employment relationships and often cannot access humanitarian protection. (3/6)