I can't believe there's still a debate about whether leftists should go on huge conservative platforms or just wait eternally for a call from the liberal platforms who hate them. Yes, getting leftist values into the mainstream by any means is better than being ignored. Duh.
Letting leftist ideas and values remain marginalized under the notion that you're "legitimizing" people who already have audiences of millions is the absolute dumbest thing you can do. Get the ideas out there if for no other reason than to force the bastards to push back on them.
The left will never have a meaningful movement as long as it's relegated to the unseen fringes, and there are people whose entire job is figuring out how to keep them there. Don't give them your marginalization for free; at least make them come out in the open and fight for it.
Refusing to let leftist ideas and values be heard by conservative audiences just deprives conservatives of something they need, AND it deprives liberal audiences as well since if you can get your point into the mainstream the liberal platforms have to talk about it too.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One who moves from cradle to grave
in the flip book illusion we call time
without deeply attending to this cavalcade of miracles
is one who never lived.
Lifeless are they who live by habit,
who walk by habit,
who sit by habit,
who see by habit,
who think by habit,
who feel by habit.
Lifeless are they who drift through on dead patterns
instead of giving the omnipresent Holiness its due reverence.
The alive ones meet each moment
like a dog greets its master at the door after work.
They do not think: they wonder.
They do not watch: they marvel.
They do not walk: they adventure.
They do not sit: they engage.
They do not wait: they worship.
The best way to manufacture consent for world-threatening cold war escalations is to convince half the population that a leader they hate opposes those escalations for corrupt reasons. They did it very successfully with Russia, and if Biden gets in they'll do it again with China.
This gives one half of the political spectrum a literally insatiable appetite for more and more escalations, and gives the other half a vested interest in proving that their guy is "tough" on the nation in question. Russiagate was extremely successful, so why change the formula?
No sane person would consent to their nation's resources and wealth going toward a conflict that could wipe out every terrestrial organism instead of toward the citizenry, so propaganda is necessary. Russiagate was arguably the most successful psyop in history. It's the formula.
"We have the greatest respect for the journalist Glenn Greenwald used to be, and we remain proud of much of the work we did with him over the past six years. It is Glenn who has strayed from his original journalistic roots, not The Intercept."
Humanity's Madness Would Not Be Possible Without Extensive Marketing
"Without extensive marketing it would never have occurred to anyone that murdering human beings in other countries is a good career path for young people." caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/humanitys-ma…
Without extensive marketing it would never have occurred to people that inhaling cigarette smoke into their lungs all the time is a nice thing to do.
Without extensive marketing it would never have occurred to people that Mountain Dew is something they should put into their bodies.
Biden Will NOT Be Soft On China; He'll Continue Trump's Aggressions
"If the US intelligence cartel had had any suspicion that Biden might obstruct their agendas in the eastern hemisphere, his presidential campaign would have been capsized over a year ago" caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/biden-will-n…
Toward the end of the Bobulinski interview came the really important part, the part we were all meant to see:
The same exact low rumble, slowly rising toward the same fever pitch crescendo. First you get a few unexpected comments showing up in your notifications, then a few more, then a lot more, then a whole lot more.
It's Russiagate all over again.
The increasingly shrill shrieking from rightists about China having leverage over Biden is so similar to what I experienced from liberals at this exact point in time in 2016 about Russia having leverage over Trump. They get mad when I say it but it's true.