Yes, some Dems are too reluctant to oppose left-wing political violence and call out Antifa.
And yes, some on the left are too willing to support censorship in social media, advocate for employees to be fired for conservative views, and to cheer on attacks on free speech.
But..
1)
Trump presents a serious danger to constitutional values.
His bark is much, much louder than his bite. But his actual actions in office have also been utterly unacceptable.
Any voter genuinely concerned about the rise of illiberal forces must wish to remove him from office.
The boss of the NYT op-ed page was fired because he ran a controversial op-ed by a sitting U.S. Senator.
But a few months later, a propagandist for an authoritarian regime gets to argue that a violent putdown of peaceful protests was needed in the same pages.
This is just nuts.
I did not like Cotton's op-ed.
And there is a case for turning the NYT op-ed page into a venue that fights for liberal democratic values rather than printing all the opinion that's newsworthy.
But the hypocrisy here is just staggering.
It is also one of the best examples of, um, systemic racism in American journalism:
Want to advocate for brutal measures that might affect American lives? No way.
Want to advocate for brutal measures that destroy lives in Asia or Africa? Welcome to our pages!
1) A serious movie that condemns the patriarchal values imposed on many immigrant girls *and* the hyper-sexualized mainstream culture into which some of them flee.
2) The depictions of child sexuality, though meant to condemn, end up glorifying it in troubling ways.
If you forgive the slightly strange comparison, the moral ambiguity of the movie is a little similar to that of La Dolce Vita:
1) There's no doubt that the filmmaker seeks to condemn what they depict.
2) But they depict it so lingeringly that their moral stance is compromised.
Final point:
The people who OKed the marketing campaign have a lot to answer for.
90% of this movie is a serious and at times excellent art house movie without any sensationalism.
While I was troubled by the other 10%, foregrounding it for clicks did the movie needless harm.
It's rare that a short piece changes how I think about an important issue.
But this, by @MetaHumean for @JoinPersuasion, really helped me understand something that's been bugging me about the standard critique of colorblindness.