More on the "1600 bedder" claims. Seems like they were prompted by a question from a guy who thinks the pandemic was created because of a treaty signed in 2005 🤡
nb this means that Ireland will participate in criminal law aspects, NOT immigration aspects, of Schengen 1/
2/ This is very similar to the UK's partial participation in Schengen - which will finish at the end of the transition period, ie at the same moment when Irish partial participation *starts*.
The author of this tweet is being misleading, in order to defend his or her previous lie. The current tariff on soya sauce from Japan is zero, due to the EU/Japan FTA which the UK applies until the end of the year. The UK and Japan do not currently trade on WTO terms.
As @ColinYeo1 has pointed out foreign national offenders from an EU country are nothing to do with the asylum system. But I'll add that since @ukhomeoffice officials surely know this, the authors of this tweet are therefore brazen liars who are unfit for public service.
I have emailed the permanent secretary to the Home Office to this end: "Frankly, I find it hard to see how this behaviour is consistent with the civil service code - in particular the requirements of integrity and honesty."
Judgment in @privacyint and French and Belgian cases: mass data retention is illegal in principle, but can be justified on national security grounds if temporary and subject to safeguards
EU courts have jurisdiction to rule on damages if EU foreign policy sanctions were illegal; but a breach of the obligation to provide adequate reasons does not give rise to damages liability
Commission: letter of formal notice sent to UK re the internal market bill and the withdrawal agreement. Invites the UK to reply within a month.
An explanation of the legal process - thread
The Commission is using the infringement procedure, which applies if Member States allegedly breach EU law. It applies to UK too for now, due to Art 131 of the withdrawal agreement, which gives CJEU its usual jurisdiction during the transition period, including over the agreement
Starting the infringement process doesn't establish by itself that UK has broken the law. It contains several pre-litigation phases. After the one month expires, the next phase is a reasoned opinion to the UK. Usually two months to reply to that, but the Commission can shorten.