A personal note on that long-ass thread — in the years since I broke with Christian fundamentalism, my positions on many issues have changed. But my values — as in, the things that I value in my life and in the world — have been much steadier.
In that world, I was taught that what made me good — capable of kindness, able to help those around me, infused with purpose — was an external force that had saved me from my corrupt nature.
For someone who cares about other people, that's a terrifying framework to break out of. You have to re-learn new foundations for everything, learn to trust yourself and deal with both praise and criticism in very different ways.
A while ago, someone asked me what I'd tell my former self if I could go back in time, write a letter, somehow send a message. I joked that I'd travel back in time and slap myself for being such a condescending dick so often, but… that's only part of the story.
I ended up writing a letter — medium.com/growing-up-god… — and the experience helped me accept just how scared I'd been in that world. Not just of The Other but of myself.
If you're a friend or acquaintance or unfortunate retweet recipient of this thread, I want to make clear that my laser-focus on the pathologies of the Christian Right do not mean that I want you, or anyone, to turn on God.
I don't want to lure you away; I don't want to soothe some feeling of impurity-guilt on my own part.
While I no longer share your faith, I know many who still do — and whose expression of it is full of kindness and open-hearted care for those who most need it.
Sometimes, we hold onto things that are terrible because we're told the alternative is even worse. We learn to treat the terrible thing as something that is, really, if you look at it just right, good after all.
It's hard to let go of that. Terrifying, even. But what is on the other side is not an evil version of you; the deepest things that matter most to you, that move you and bring out the best in you, will still be there.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As part of the upcoming @CRightcast project, I've been spending some time breaking down the building blocks of the fundamentalist ideology I was part of for many years. It's tough because — like many complex systems — the important themes are easily obscured by doctrinal details.
That isn't to say that specific doctrines aren't important. But the "religious right" is a messy conglomeration of groups that, in many situations, insist the other members are heretics. For folks outside the culture, it feel like an extended game of "No True Scotsman."
For me, understanding what I was a part of and unpacking its impact on how I saw the world required stepping back from the specific points of theology and doctrine, and looking at the patterns they formed; the ways of seeing, understanding, and responding.
When discussing the role of component and pattern-oriented approaches in web design and content modeling, it's really useful to look at how the ideas (and vocabulary) made their way from the world of architecture (Christopher Alexander's Pattern Language, etc) to software dev.
The gang of four book ("Design Patterns", published in '07) was a huge influence on the software development world but Kent Beck and Ward Cunningham were writing about the idea of building software from reusable patterns in the 80s.
One of their earliest papers on the topic (c2.com/doc/oopsla87.h…) doesn't just spell out the *technical* aspects of the concept, but their motivations for introducing the pattern-centric approach to managing complexity.
Also, since everyone's dunking on the "That's witchcraft" thing — that is … not an unlitigated issue in Charismatic/Pentacostal Christianity, as it turns out! The conclusion boils down to: the line between Witchcraft and Prophecy is which supernatural being you're listening to.
If God tells you what's going to happen in the future, that's a prophetic gift. If you try to find out what will happen in the future from other supernatural sources (demons, ancestors, positions of planets, etc) that's witchcraft. Tidy!
The complicating factor, of course, is that ~prophecy~ is, Biblically speaking, a highly regulated profession and the Old Testament spells out in no uncertain terms that if you ~prophecy~ something and it doesn't come to pass you're a ~false prophet~ and you get stoned to death.
The merger of fundamentalist apocalypse eschatology and conservative totalitarianism fetish has been complete for a while, now they‘re just comfortable enough to talk about in mixed company.
I’m not being dismissive — there is genuine fear of totalitarian persecution, mixed with giddy fascination, at the heart of this rhetoric. A Thief In The Night meets McCarthyist rhetoric is a wild cocktail.
Tragically, the absolute certainty that they’ll be hunted and persecuted by [antichrist/antiamerica] dictators ... is the justification for the pursuit of dictatorial power and disenfranchisement of anyone they believe could be The Enemy.
Piper constructs elaborate, squirming abstracts to avoid saying anything negative about Trump by name.
Compare it to his full-throated condemnation of Obama over the course of earlier campaigns—because the clergy Obama associated with disagreed with Piper on culture-war topics.
The point here isn't to point out hypocrisy, rather it's to note the depth to which the religious right's warping of Christian cultural engagement around reproduction and sexuality has debased the church's role and voice.
Piper can barely bring himself to *obliquely* criticize the *kind* of person lies continually, cheats workers of their wages, puts children in cages to deliberately terrorize families, abuses the vulnerable, and a host of other sins.