Yoong Profile picture
3 Nov, 9 tweets, 3 min read
Always amusing to see men (or rather boys) trying to use declining fertility of women by showing fertility rates to justify that women should marry young.

Firstly, reproduction is not the only purpose in life or partnerships/marriage.

Secondly, they are reading the data wrong.
Fertility rates (broadly) is defined as avg number of children born by a woman in her reproductive years over her lifetime. It measure a period, not the cohort’s metric.

And number of children born means u need the man as well, so the equal & opposite cohort to see is the men.
Blaming women biology for low fertility rates or high risk pregnancies in older women is lazy & ignorant.

Fertility rates drop in older women because their male partners are older too, therefore time to conception is later.
And men fertility is not constant throughout his life. That is a myth.

There will be decrease in male fertility as he age too. Changes in sexual function like erectile dysfunction, deterioration in sperm quality (motility, number, morphology).
Sperm quality affected by environmental/lifestyle factors; sedentary lifestyle, smoking, poor diet, pollution, stress.

Men also have lower testosterone after 40. It’s called andropause. A whole host of stuff affects men.

And poor sperm quality is known to cause birth defects.
Back to women, age does not define when the woman should or should not conceive & is not the real cause of birth risks. Age does not matter actually.
In fact, children of mothers in older maternal age group have better socio-behavioural growth.
There is a significant advantage of older maternal age group mothers: maturity.

But the most important factor of all, to give women good education. Good education = mature mothers = mentally/physically healthy children = better society.
So please, boys, if you don’t fully understand factors affecting fertility of both men and women, don’t lazily pluck 1 graph and try to justify what is an archaic mindset of women have to marry young.

Just main jauh-jauh lah. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Yoong

Yoong Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @yoongkhean

2 Nov
The person interviewed is no doubt severely misinformed (or ignorant) so no need to amplify her.

But it gives us an opportunity to reexamine what is UHC for us and how effective is the index. (This thread might be #unpopularopinion 😅)
WHO defines UHC as equitable access to HC without financial hardship. Some fancy math done & the index for us & neighbours are:

Malaysia 70
Indonesia 60
Singapore, Brunei & Thailand >80
Vietnam 73
Philippines & Myanmar 50

We are somewhere in the middle amongst SEA countries.
I think the UHC missed a crucial detail, not just physical or financial accessibility. But it must be timely.

Our demography & geography is so varied that UHC index of 70 doesn’t portray the full picture.
Read 6 tweets
27 Jun
Lol apa anakku buat ni
I am getting bombarded by WhatsApp stickers 🤦🏻‍♂️ #OhEmmaku
I can almost hear her laughing at me. 😑
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!