THREAD: Covering today's election results will be one of the hardest challenges the news media has faced in modern history. @vivian & I talked to a lot of smart people and came up with 10 principles that news orgs should abide by as they ready coverage: cjr.org/politics/2020-…
If you're a reporter or editor, I hope you'll take a few minutes to read these principles & think about what it means for your own work and your own news organization and how you should responsibly report and frame the unofficial tallies tonight: cjr.org/politics/2020-…
1) Problems are not failures. Make sure to draw lines today between "normal stuff" going wrong and systemic failures. Not every mishap shows a rigged system. At the same time, there are known signs of voter suppression—and systemic problems should be reported as such.
2) Know the calendar. The public (and Trump!) expects winners within hours of the polls closing, but the numbers collected on election night are not decisive. Just because a state takes a week or longer to finalize results, that doesn’t jeopardize the integrity of the system.
Explain clearly in your coverage how what dates matter and how it's totally fine for counts to be slow. We've *NEVER* gotten full counts or full results on election night. There should be *zero* expectation that happens tonight.
3)  Manage expectations using careful language. The news media can unintentionally mislead the audience about the media’s role. Be precise. The media “projects” winners; it should not at any point this week “declare” a winner, “call” a race, or “count” a vote.
4) Explain this year will be different. Many states aren't going to initially know their “denominator”—that it is, how many total ballots have been cast—because of the rise of mail-in and absentee ballot. That # is critical for "projecting" a winner; thus, things might be slow.
5) Prepare for a possible shift as ballots are counted. Some races—and entire states!—that look close tonight might not end up close at all by Thursday. What looks like an early lead might evaporate. None of these shifts should be considered prima facie evidence of fraud.
6)  Provide vote counts and election numbers in context. The way tallies are presented or reported can unintentionally undermine trust in the legitimacy of the election—especially this year, when record levels of mail-in votes will add complexity.
There are no election "results" until all votes are counted. There's no way to "flip" the election if votes are still being counted, just as it doesn't matter what order voters show up at the polls today. Don't frame lead changes as "flips" tonight or tomorrow.
7) Results aren’t “late” because the winner isn’t known tonight. If the election is a blowout, we’ll know tonight or maybe noon tomorrow. If it’s close, it’s normal and lawful for counting to continue for weeks. What you think is “slow” isn’t. It’s the system functioning.
8) THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT: Don’t parrot premature victory claims. And don’t frame premature declarations as “both sides” disagreements—e.g., “Trump says he’s won, while Biden says he hasn’t.” There are no winners until the whole vote is counted everywhere. Don't play that game.
9) Hold officials accountable without undermining voter confidence. How reporters frame and report on controversies, problems, and candidate complaints will help determine public confidence in the integrity of the outcome. Support vote counters. They're doing hard work this week.
10) Be prepared. Ground yourself in data, history, and constitutional and electoral law. Well before Election Day, news organizations should work to vet and line up a host of credible experts and analysts beyond the “normal” pundits, like constitutional and electoral law experts.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Garrett M. Graff

Garrett M. Graff Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @vermontgmg

4 Nov
THREAD: Today is shaping up to be one of the most critical days in US media history—huge challenge to help protect legitimacy of the election in the eyes of voters. @vivian & I have 10 key principles that news orgs need to abide by as they work today: cjr.org/politics/2020-…
If you're a reporter or editor, I hope you'll take a few minutes to read these principles & think about what it means for your own work and your own news organization and how you should responsibly report and frame the unofficial tallies coming in now: cjr.org/politics/2020-…
We've seen a lot of good coverage already, but some WILDLY irresponsible ones that threaten real damage to our democracy today (Hi @ajc!):
Read 16 tweets
2 Nov
This remarkable story about the president giving up on his intelligence briefings sort of slipped by over the weekend amid election news—but I think it's worth re-highlighting for three particularly worrisome reasons: nytimes.com/2020/10/30/us/…
1) It is *bonkers* that the President has not had a regular intelligence briefing in over a MONTH. That should set off all kinds of alarm bells. We spend $60 billion a year to ensure the President is the smartest person in every room he's in. Trump has turned all of that aside.
2) Separately, the fact that he is now only getting briefings from John Ratcliffe—a man so unqualified for his job that Congress literally wrote a law to keep people like him away from becoming ODNI, but the GOP confirmed him anyway—is super troubling. wired.com/story/john-rat…
Read 7 tweets
2 Nov
THREAD: There has been a lot fretting and anxiety over recent weeks about this year's election—and there are real threats and real reasons to be anxious—but based on my reporting ... [[DEEP BREATH!]] ... let me also offer five big reasons for optimism that tomorrow will be okay:
1) In many ways, Tuesday will be the most secure and safe election in US history. Local and state election administrators have been rushing since '16 to secure systems, ensure paper backups, and otherwise prep to ensure the day's voting and counting goes smoothly as possible.
2) It will surely be the most resilient election in US history — potentially 2/3 of all votes will have already been cast, which means there will be fewer crowds, fewer opportunities for things to go wrong, and fewer people affected if/when things do go inevitably wrong.
Read 8 tweets
2 Nov
THREAD: Knowing this year’s election victor may take longer than Americans expect—and so it's worth offering a “Schoolhouse Rocks” education in the process tomorrow and thereafter. Let me explain just how tightly proscribed the process is: politico.com/news/magazine/…
1) First, it's *fine* and normal for vote-counting to take days or weeks. We're used to unofficial tallies by the news media yielding a projected winner by early Wednesday, the official system is slower and tightly guided by state laws, federal laws, and the Constitution itself.
2) Those official night-of tallies are updated, checked, and double-checked before local officials report election results to their state's designated election official—usually the secretary of state, governor, or lt. governor—who certifies election results.
Read 12 tweets
2 Nov
THREAD: I've been talking to all sorts of experts about how the next four months might unfold. Here's an organized, chronological guide to six pieces that you should read as we wait to see the results tomorrow:
1) Here are ten principles I wrote with @vivian that media organizations need to follow as they report election results—including using precise language and numbers, make clear a "slow count is a good count," and don't parrot premature claims of victory. cjr.org/politics/2020-…
2) Here are top cyber threats to watch for tomorrow. The main threat is what @ngleicher calls "perception hacks." Chances hackers change election results? Very small. Chances they'll try to convince us they did & the vote is not legitimate? Quite high. wired.com/story/election…
Read 7 tweets
19 Oct
THREAD: Covering election results will be one of the hardest challenges the news media has faced in modern history. @vivian & I talked to a lot of smart people and came up with 10 principles that news orgs should abide by as they prepare their coverage: cjr.org/politics/2020-…
If you're a reporter or editor, I hope you'll take a few minutes to read these principles & think about what it means for your own work and your own news organization and how you should responsibly report and frame the unofficial tallies on election night: cjr.org/politics/2020-…
1) Problems are not failures. Make sure to draw lines between "normal stuff" going wrong and systemic failures. Not every mishap is evidence of a rigged system. At the same time, there are already signs of suppression & trouble—and systemic problems should be reported as such.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!