An odd quirk of American socialism is that it has embraced a class analysis based not on occupation (i.e. relationship to the means of production), but on tax brackets.
And to be clear, I think these two types of class analysis each have advantages and disadvantages...
On the disadvantage side, American socialism doesn't have a good way of thinking about the difference between a $10millionare car dealership owner, a $10millionaire software startup owner, and a $10millionaire lawyer.

And this is an important political difference!!
On the advantage side, thinking about class in terms of tax brackets lends itself to sensible welfare-state and tax-based redistribution policies -- i.e. social democracy -- more easily than traditional Marxism, which requires a revolution by factory workers (and/or farmers).
On the disadvantage side, number-based class analysis tends to miss the increasingly important educational divide in American (and European) politics.
But on the advantage side, numbers are easy to communicate, especially in the age of social media. "Look at how little taxes the top bracket pays" makes a great viral graph. "Look at how the owners exploit the workers" does not.
Anyway I personally think both types of analysis have value, and I hope someone will come along and combine them into something more nuanced and complex than what we have now. But in the meantime, it's interesting to note the ways the two types of analysis diverge.

(end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noah Smith 🐇

Noah Smith 🐇 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Noahpinion

4 Nov
1/Regardless of the election outcome, Trump's inroads with Hispanic voters kills the idea that the Democrats are the Inevitable Party of the Demographic Future.

amazon.com/Emerging-Democ…
2/This idea was always based on the false belief that future ethnic voting patterns would be similar to past patterns -- that "Latinos vote like such-and-such" was a stable property of the Universe that would remain constant through the decades.
3/Ignoring the lessons of history, some Democrats believed that Hispanics would always be a reliable 70-30 voting bloc, so that all Democrats had to do was sit and wait for their numbers to swell, and the GOP would vanish like morning mist.
Read 13 tweets
4 Nov
Here was my official pre-election prediction. Note timestamp!
Trump just said "Frankly, we did win this election", so my prediction that he'd declare victory now seems fulfilled.
He also declared his intent to sue to stop vote-counting, so my whole prediction is on target so far.
Read 5 tweets
3 Nov
Hot take: China is scary precisely because it's so much like early 20th century America.
1. Coal-powered manufacturing-based industrial supremacy with ambitions to catch up in science

2. Disinterest in global politics but ambitions to dominate neighbors

3. Repression of minorities

4. Drive for homogeneity, jingoism, repression of press freedom
Not that this reflects particularly well on China.

The alternatives to America, 100 years ago, were Germany, Russia, Japan, and the British Empire. The alternatives to China today are far more benign.

Being a 1920 superpower in 2020 is...not a great thing to be.
Read 4 tweets
2 Nov
Giggles flopping is referred to as a "gigaflop"
Buffalo Giggles
Giggles being cute
Read 10 tweets
1 Nov
Sullivan and Harris are right here, FWIW. Trump's presence in office does inflame social divisions, a Biden victory would ease them just a little bit.

But I expect this argument not to persuade many Trump voters, for whom Trump support is an act of defiance, not rationality.
On a rational level, Trump's supporters realize that having him as their leader hurts their cause. Rationality would say dump him, take the L in 2020, and come back next cycle with someone who isn't an incompetent corrupt chaos agent.
But rationality isn't what's driving Trump supporters.

Trump, to them, represents a stiffening of the back, a refusal to knuckle under, a pugnacious extension of the jaw. In short, an act of Resistance.

nationalreview.com/2020/10/the-on…
Read 5 tweets
28 Oct
Super-spooky picture of Cinnamon behind a pillow
Cinnamon at the rabbit hotel
Cinnamon sleeping under the bed
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!