Been reading through I Timothy lately & there's a lot in there about fighting the good fight & contending for the faith. Interestingly, tho, the primary threat seems to be... yourself.
Paul seems very concerned that Timothy wage the good warfare against his own sinfulness & lack of faith. Learning to train himself in godliness is how he would lead others to godliness.
This is really important frame of reference b/c Scripture does describe Xian life as warfare & struggle. Too often, tho, we co-opt this language as cover for hating our ideological enemies.
It also clarifies that we can't expect to lead others toward goodness & godliness if we aren't fighting for it in our own hearts.
And believe me, it will be a war. It will require sacrifice and work and putting to death all sorts of evil. It might even keep you so busy that you don't have too much time to worry about judging your neighbor.
But know this, if you cultivate a heart of godliness, if you surrender to the Holy Spirit's work, faith will well up inside of you like a spring of living water & overflow in life for those around you.
Your life will lead others to faithfulness b/c it will argue for the truth of what you claim.
But know this: There's no substitute for it. No shortcut. No way to faithfulness except through faith. No way to godliness except by God himself.
All that to say, if you're not waging war w/ your own worst tendencies, I'm not interested in your calls for me to join you in fighting another enemy.
B/c those who excuse their own lack of virtue as necessary for the fight against evil have already surrendered to it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Per previous threads: Things are both simpler & more complicated than initially appear. Simpler in sense that we all fundamentally want & need same things. More complicated in that our contexts & differing experiences of the world affect how we go about trying to achieve them.
I struggle w/ expanations that reverse these: That frame the differences btwn people as something essential to their very personhood rather than explained by their context, history, distinct challenges, & lived experience.
This isn't to say that we don't respond wrongly or unethically in trying to meeting core needs. We absolutely do & we must challenge this. It's not okay to solve a legitimate need in an illegitimate way.
So digital life is both new & untested & also a lifeline. Some folks are actively discovering it in context of Trumpism. That's part of there reason why they're so concerned w/ what they perceive to be social media censorship.
Imagine living in a somewhat isolated area, catching up with digital age & all it offers you irt shopping, connection, education, etc. at the same time that politics is going extremely online.
You've just decided you can trust it. You like it even. You've found folks who share your views & you're not isolated anymore. & then, like that, your experience of it is threatened--maybe you can't trust it after all? Especially if it's suggested that "they" are controlling it.
B/c of lag time btwn these communities & suburbs, cities, reliable internet & culture of digital age is at a different stage of development. Here's what I mean:
It's only been 2-3 years that our local elementary school has taken communication online. As PTA, we debated about whether enough parents & guardians were comfortable enough w/ it for it to be main source of communication.
I live in & come from places like Levant & I have a couple thoughts--not about the election so much as to whether Trump's approach actually helps give voice to these communities' concerns or further alienates them from the rest of the country.
(For context: I grew up in swPA outside of Pittsburgh & currently live in swVA. My husband has pastored in both regions & our friends & relatives tend to be very pro-Trump.)
From purely annectdotal standpoint, I have seen intensification of Trump support from 2016 to 2020. The common explanation is that he gives voice to their concerns. Also, I think he pays attention to them & validates them which is just, if not, more important.