With so many states having legalized cannabis via referendum while bureaucrats and “representatives” in D.C. have done nothing, there’s a big lesson.
Let people vote directly on more issues, and concentrate those votes locally. We’re too centralized with most decision making.
Frankly, the presidency shouldn’t matter that much and neither should Congress. States and municipalities should matter more. That’s the best way to deal with the crazy polarization out there. Ironically, we need to decentralize to remain a country.
Colorado and Washington legalized cannabis in 2012. At that point South Dakota wasn’t ready. So people watched how the experiment went, and years later other states followed. Local experimentation. This is how America is supposed to work. More of this, less D.C.
I’ve becoming increasingly disillusioned with two things.
- Centralized governance (D.C.)
- Representative democracy (voting for someone to make decisions for you.
I’ve become more interested and in favor of.
- Local governance
- Direct democracy (focused at the local level)
To the extent “representatives” are needed, they should exist to carry out the will of the people as opposed to being decision makers themselves.
A major problem is when you bicker endlessly over marginal issues, you’ll never come together rationally on any big issues that lend themselves to a national approach.
Cannabis legalization across the country while the imperial government remains opposed is a rare black eye for the supremacy of the authoritarian centralized state. If it can be done there, it can be done on other issues. If we want to save this country, it will be done locally.
There seems to be less acrimony in the aftermath of local referendums irrespective of how they go. What really gets people angry is when “representatives” in D.C. sell them out, which happens nearly 100% of the time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's the big takeaway from the 2020 election. All the trends I've been expecting have been solidified and reinforced. A total and growing distrust in once revered institutions, especially media and pompous always wrong blue checks.
A feeling that faux "elites," oligarchs and the national security state are constantly lying and manipulating the public for ends that go against the public interest. Also more of an understanding you can't fundamentally change the system via voting for president.
Sanders, Trump supporters and non-voters will all increasingly feel this way in the coming years under a Biden/Harris administration. Both sides that lean populist, even if superficially, will now discount change via voting during these circuses.
Think about what powerful interests want you to do and how they want you to live, and do the opposite whenever possible and reasonable.
The best response to a twisted system is to opt out.
For some, this will mean radical changes to their lives, for others it will mean small adjustments on the margin. But everyone can do a little something to reject this nonsense.
Ask yourself this. How am I participating in my own destruction; mentally, spiritually and economically. Then do what you can to change course.
I think the power structure in the U.S. underestimates how much the general public hates their guts.
We’re not sure what to do about it and how, but the contempt and disgust is strong and growing.
People need to stop flippantly throwing around “civil war.” That makes absolutely no sense. The actions we are seeing are more revolutionary than “civil war.”
Elites may try to push the angst into a civil war though, but that’s divide and rule stuff. Don’t be stupid.
People who point out that the U.S. government's account of 9/11 was a total fairytale continue to be dismissed as wackos, yet the U.S. government's account of 9/11 was in fact undeniably a total fairytale. news.yahoo.com/amphtml/in-cou…
20 years later and it's still so shady.
"William Barr and acting DNI Richard Grenell barring the public release of the Saudi official’s name and all related documents, concluding they are “state secrets” that, if disclosed, could cause “significant harm to the national security”
Looks whose side the U.S. government is on.
*Hint not the 9/11 victims.
"The fight for access to key documents and evidence has dragged on, with repeated battles between the lawyers for the families on one side, and lawyers for FBI, DOJ and the Saudi government on the other."
Are they trying to encourage the guillotines or are they just so corrupt they can't help themselves.
Every self-respecting person should vow to never spend a dime at Ruth's Chris ever again.
Evil fkers.
Ruth's Chris:
"The only people remaining on payroll are managers,” according to the employee. The rest of the staff at these restaurants, with the possible exception of a few chefs, were let go.
This publicly traded company took $20 million in "small biz" loans.
Our financial system is totally not 100% corrupt or anything. Anyone who thinks that is a nutter.
"But the bond purchasing programs in particular have few restrictions on executive compensation, on buybacks, on layoffs or offshoring of labor, on payments to private equity owners, etc."