So it now appears likely that the official tally will have Trump losing Michigan by about 70,000 votes. Here is something to think about if you are concerned that Michigan was stolen. 1/
A banker's box of sealed paper can hold about 5,000 sheets. That's while the pages are unprinted, unfolded, and sealed. If you turn those pages into marked ballots, you're gonna lose space, and if they're folded and placed in envelopes, that's even more space. 2/
But let's set all that aside for a minute and just pretend that these ballots, in whatever form Democrats snuck them inside, could somehow take up no more space apiece than each page inside a sealed ream of paper. 3/
What that would mean would be that Democrats had to somehow sneak 14 bankers boxes worth of material inside the polling place. Which is just huge from a volume standpoint and is something any GOP poll watcher would've immediately noticed. 4/
When you factor in that the ballots in question are supposed to be mail in ballots then they would unquestionably have been at the very least folded just so they would pass the laugh test, which means that in reality you're talking probably at least 20 boxes worth of ballots. 5/
I don't wanna rule out hijinks here - you never do - but in order for the amount of hijinks to have actually changed the result in Michigan, it would take a pretty serious and implausible feat. 6/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread re one of the things I keep seeing thrown around as evidence of fraud is the manner in which the media has reported vote totals. The allegation that has raised its head more than any other I've seen concerns massive tranches of votes coming in 100% for Biden. 1/
The most important, number one thing to note about the media's reporting of results is that IT IS NOT RELEVANT AT ALL. The media isn't even getting the figures you've been seeing from official tallies, they get them from private data companies. 2/
These companies are not official and nothing they say counts. They provide a service to media orgs by calling counties and getting totals and inputting them faster than official state websites do... 3/
I think if this race gets called for Biden today, which is likely, the Trump campaign should be given every reasonable opportunity to challenge any voting irregularities they can find in the court system, and to prove their case to the American people. 1/
I CAN say that I've spent the entire week running down claims that people have forwarded to me or asked me to look into. I have not yet seen any credible even allegations of fraud that is anything close to widespread enough that it would have changed the outcome in any state. 2/
In fact, the only actual and specific allegation of fraud that I've even seen raised is the Trump campaign's allegation concerning the voters in Nevada. Otherwise, they have complained about the counting process (but admitted they've been allowed to observe). 3/
Am I really seeing this correctly? Nevada gives us nothing for 48 hours and then comes back with less than 30,000 new votes? Surely this is a joke or I'm just adding wrong.
I could have counted this many votes by myself, by hand, in that time.
Last night I was flipping through channels and came across CNN and Wolf Blitzer was saying "no one is criticizing officials in Arizona and Nevada, we want them to take all the time they need to get this right."
This is demonstrably false. Many, many people are complaining.
It is a “debunked conspiracy theory” except for the at least 13 people who have been arrested for intentionally starting West coast fires, including the Almeda fire, the Ranch 2 fire, the Dolan fire and the Sweet Creek Milepost 2 fire theblaze.com/news/at-least-…
I mean these arrests are public record. This is straight up Orwellian shit. Obviously not all or even most of the fires were started by arsonists but it is equally obvious that some were.
And my gosh, look at all these law enforcement agencies just begging people to stop saying that people have intentionally set these fires
Yes, this is how it works, legally. If I shoot someone in self-defense, and someone else nearby mistakenly but honestly believes that I just murdered someone in cold blood and puts my life in peril trying to subdue me, I have a valid self-defense claim against them, too. 1/
If Person A and I are having an argument in my back yard and Person A pulls a gun on me and I shoot them, I've acted in self defense. If Person B comes around the corner and sees the dead body (but not the gun) and charges me with a knife, I can defend myself against them, too 2/
It's regrettable and terrible when these sorts of things happen which is one of the reasons I said repeatedly that it was a mistake for Rittenhouse to even be there. I would even not rule out charges for anyone who may have provided him with the gun and transportation there. 3/
Here is a thing that I often hear police (usually some police union spokesperson) say that is really tiresome and makes no sense: "We are struggling with people not giving us respect because our mayor/city hall/city leaders have turned people against us." 1/
This is a representative democracy. Politicians reflect popular opinion, they do not create it (they can influence it, but not create it out of whole cloth). 2/
In the city where I live, the police are a respected institution. If the mayor came out tomorrow and said the police were terrible and not to be listened to, a) no one would listen and b) he would promptly get voted out of office. 3/