All right, let's do this. I'm watching Fox tonight. For old time's sake.

Tucker is on with @JennaEllisEsq. Only caught the end of it, but the discussion is very abstract, with generic invocations of transparency and right to vote, etc. Very detached air to the whole exchange.
My Pillow commercial, drink.
"We still have a path to victory," Tucker's subdued next guest insists. He then complains about the failure of a judge to recognize the Trump campaign's "right" to view various election activities.
Tucker Carlson isn't directly acknowledging that Trump lost, but he's totally acknowledging Trump lost.
Tucker is now attacking "outraged wine moms."
Tucker is now talking about Zapata and Starr Counties, and the Latino vote shift there. Which, well, fair enough.
Tucker is now pulling clips from random YouTube people to use as examples of what Democrats in general are like.

Everything sounds like they're on tranqs though.
"Intersectionality means that white men oppress everyone else," Tucker says, to explain to his listeners what intersectionality is.
Fox News already flipped on Trump last night. This current performance is just the wake.
Tucker says he is different from all the Fake News Media outlets because he, unlike them, admits he's wrong. For instance, he admits he was wrong in predicting that Biden would be pulled off the primary campaign trail, and never make it onto the ballot.
Tucket says that last night's results were "not the landslide [the media] expected," and so watching how upset some were was "like Christmas again and again."

It's as if Tucker is making a play to claim he was never pro-Trump, he was just pro-liberal tears.
My Pillow commercial, drink.
"They were totally convinced Biden would just sweep!" Tucker cackles, finding the bright side even in what is obviously going to be Trump's decisive loss.
"These people are sad! Really sad! That America would disagree with them," says Tucker. His definition of "America" is apparently "Trump voters."
This dude called Mark Steyn is on and I don't know who he is but he is just saying words in no particularly discernable order.

The mists of Michigan and the great romance of Kamala have been mentioned.

Tucker seems relieved to hand off to Hannity.
Hannity's tone sounds more normal (for him) than Tucker's, right off the bat.

He is ranting about how Trump has done more for "the human condition" than anyone else in our history.
Hannity: "How many dead people received ballots, Kevin McCarthy was telling me all about it."
Hannity is monologuing, and not gonna lie, I forgot to pay attention for a couple minutes there.
Hannity is attacking how wrong the polls were.

Lots of bitching about the media and the Democrats, but so far no effort to claim that Trump "actually won" the election.

Trump's loss remains unarticulated, and undenied.
Current segment: "The Malicious Media." Hannity is revisiting all the old hits about the deep state, big tech, and Hillary.

He then mentions how Biden is suffering from dementia and the media is helping him to cover it up.
Hannity: "Do you trust what happened in this election? ... I have a lot of questions."

lmfao, that is the weakest Fox defense of Trump I can remember.
Hannity: "Ask yourself if you really believe... this was a fair election?"

The dude can't even directly attack the process, I assume the Fox powers that be have told him he's not allowed to this go around. So this hypothetical questions game is the best he can do.
I keep thinking of Fox News on election night 2012 and Megyn Kelly asked Karl Rove, "Is that just math you do as a Republican to make yourself feel better?", and how now in 2020 Fox doesn't even have a goddamn Megyn Kelly to ask that question.
Now James Earl Jones is reading the Bible.
My Pillow, drink.
Hannity is now discussing the Trump campaign's lawsuits. But there still has not been any suggestion from Hannity whatsoever that Trump "actually" won the election, or that the outcome is in real doubt.

I swear Fox News must've given orders to Hannity not to go there.
Speak of the devil, Karl Rove is on.

He's holding a series of (unmatched) whiteboards with lots of numbers written on them. He's explaining the distinction between mail in and drop in ballots, but Hannity interrupts him to rant about "ballots in trash cans."
My Pillow commercial, this time for the mattress topper, drink.
Why does Hannity punctuate witness interviews by emphatically waving a pair of glasses around, when he's never seen wearing them?
Hannity gets DeSantis to semi-grudgingly agree that what's goin on in the elections in PA and MI is "troubling," for unspecified reasons.
Ari Fleischer borrowed one of Karl Rove's tiny whiteboards with lots of numbers on it. How long until Hannity rage-interrupts on the wonkery.
Trump declares that the Democratic Party is now the "rich coastal elite party."
My Pillow, drink. Also My Sheets, drink again.
Ingraham, on what it will mean if the Democrats win: "It's incumbent on the Democrats to explain how this was a legitimate election. ... It's getting worse by the minute."
Ingraham is the third Fox show of the night to kill time and avoid talking about Trump lost, by instead attacking pollsters and arguing that "the 'experts' failed."

She is now complaining about how unfair it was that the media was so slow to declare Trump's state-level wins.
Ingraham brings up Zapata and Starr Counties, once again.

This is going to be the Republican line for the next two election cycles, at least.
Ingraham is now giving a eulogy to Trump, lauding his "stamina, charisma, and drive." She tells viewers, "You're going to be able to tell your grand kids that we once had a president who stood up for the little guy."
Literally not a single discussion on any Fox show tonight about why Trump didn't win enough votes, or why he failed to connect with a majority of voters.

Instead, there's been a constant litany of complaints about how Democrats fail to understand "the right half of the country."
I forgot to post this because I never caught his real name, but Hannity had this bowtie on earlier.
Not an exaggeration: there has not been a single commercial break tonight without a Mike Lindell appearance.

Also, drink.
Ingraham finally mentions the Trump campaign lawsuits against various states.

Nearly 3 hours in, and this is the first actual news update of the night.
Ingraham, on Chief Justice Roberts denying hearing a GOP case to challenge the vote: "it is a shock what he did, to not save this country."
I take no pleasure in reporting this, but drink.
"We're at the start of the second presidential campaign of 2020," says Newt Gingrich. He promises that in the coming weeks we'll see an "explosion of rage."

He argues that because of Democrat corruption, Trump should by default win all remaining undecided states.
Ingraham, on what happens if Trump loses the election:"How powerful will Donald Trump be in the next 2 to 4 year periods?"
Ingraham claims that if the corrupt Democrats cause Trump to lose this election, "He'll be bigger, much bigger" than he was before.
Yeah yeah, y'all know the drill.
Ingraham says, "The question of Biden's mental acuity was never explored by the media," confirming for all of us what we already knew about what exactly Fox News is.
Mike Lindell coming for me like
Coda: Fox News is officially over Trump.

Turned the TV on to see Pam Bondi trying to claim there's fraud going on in PA, and the Fox & Friends crew are just not having it. She uses the phrase "fake ballots" and they come down hard on her; she seems shocked to get push back.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Susan Simpson

Susan Simpson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheViewFromLL2

23 Oct
Trump implying once again that Gold Star families are responsible for giving him covid is such a baffling choice of message.
Trump with a mute on his mic is like a dog with a shock collar.
"I could be so awesome at being corrupt, way better than you," is another baffling messaging strategy from the president.
Read 9 tweets
8 Oct
If Kamala answers "fucking hell yeah" to this question I will legit not call her a cop again, for at least six months
She's a cop.
It wasn't a hell yeah, but she recovered enough that I won't call her a cop for one month.
Read 4 tweets
16 Sep
TRUMP: ... and I would have made the question mark's 401k richer than anyone had ever even heard of, if the chestnuts weren't run by Democrats.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Our next question comes from Tiffany in Wisconsin.
TRUMP: When I met Kim Jong Un, it was just like when I meet a woman. I knew within a second that it was going to happen.

STEPHANOPOULOS: We'll be right back after this break.
QUESTIONER #1: What do you say to voters concerned about the unrest in the US today

TRUMP: Corey Booker Kamala Harris Maxine Waters Squad Suburbs Corey Booker

QUESTIONER #2: For real though you've been real racist

TRUMP: Tim Scott Tim Scott Tim Scott Tim Scott
Read 5 tweets
23 Aug
Holy hell, FDA Commissioner Stephen Hahn's grasp of statistics is alarming. A 35% reduction in mortality does NOT mean that if 100 people get covid-19 and are treated with convalescent plasma, then 35 lives will be saved.
The head of the federal agency in charge of authorizing new medical treatments doesn't understand what reduction in mortality means. How can we trust anything the FDA does, if this is the guy who decides whether the agency will bow to political pressure?
This appears to be the data @SteveFDA was citing, but unable to understand. A plasma study (with no comparison group) found the treatment reduced the 7-day death rate from 11.9% to 8.7% – which Hahn interpreted to mean that 35 in 100 lives would be saved! h/t @taylorcyoung
Read 4 tweets
20 Aug
Hold up.

WeBuildTheWall raised $25 million from GoFundMe, and built 4 miles of wall at a cost of more than $50 million. And that extra $25+ million was paid for by... the contractor, Tommy Fisher, out of his own pocket.
Who is Tommy Fisher, this generous benefactor of WeBuildTheWall?

He's the guy that was awarded $1.4 billion in government contracts, after President Trump personally and "aggressively" pushed for DHS and the US Army Corps to award those contracts to him. washingtonpost.com/immigration/he…
After the US Army Corps initially rejected Tommy Fisher's bid for a wall contract, Trump summoned Pentagon officials to the White House to tell them they needed to hire Fisher's company.
Read 8 tweets
15 Aug
In light of Marjorie Taylor Greene distancing herself from QAnon, here's a brief review of some of the tweets her account has liked over the years.

First up: this warning about what happens to politicians who try to "jump shit" from QAnon... and how it doesn't work out for them. Image
Greene is of course a big believer in the cabal of "satanic pedophile globalists." Image
Which Greene thinks Hillary Clinton is a part of. Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!