"As Article 26 contemplates not merely a religious denomination but also a section thereof, the Math or the spiritual fraternity represented by it can legitimately come within the purview of this article." Key ratio of Shirur Mutt explained in SP Mittal
"A math, like an idol, is in Hindu Law a judicial person capable of acquiring, holding & vindicating legal rights, though of necessity it can only act in relation to those
rights thru the medium of some human agency"
objective of grant of Deity legal personality is same as Mutt
With worshipper followers of Hindu religion being religious denomination worshippers of a Hindu Deity are a religious denomination or section thereof given obj of legal personality of Deity is to protect the pious purpose of worshippers just like a Mutt Deity gets Art 26 rights.
Art 26 rights of Hindu Deities & Mathas flow from same origin of recognition of followers of Hindu Religion as Religious denomination in Shirur Mutt case as explained in SP Mittal. Negation of Art 26 rights of Hindu Deities will eventually lead to loss of Art 26 rights of Mutts
Several Hindu Mutts have unfortunately not understood that the direction of SC Sabarimala judgement denying Art 26 rights to Hindu Deities will eventually lead to loss of Art 26 rights to Mutts 👆and did not support Lord Ayyappa devotees in their protests.
It is unfortunate several Hindu Mutts barring few exceptions have not supported Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement which took birth from Sabarimala movement. They are yet to realize Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity is also fighting for their Art 26 rights
"Secularism" became "pecularism" when word "religious denomination" was interpreted to deny Art 26 rights to worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination.
resp to @ShashiTharoor ji comments below one can alter basic structure by just reinterpreting word "religious denomination"
Reinterpretation of "religious denomination" in a way that takes away Art 26 rights of worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination protected in legal personality of Deity is against agreement with Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity barred u Art 363.
When Travancore (ruled by Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Deity) Legislature ratified Draft Constitution religious denomination included worshippers of Hindu Religion
On Sardar Patel's birth anniversary let us focus on his constituent assembly promise "essential feature of State Constitution forms essential feature of our Constitution" in the context of Travancore Constitution & how "pecularism" of today is in complete violation of his promise
In Travancore Kingdom ruled by Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Deity worshippers of Hindu Religion were a Religious denomination as is clear from 1828 Missionary gazetteer and the pious purpose of the denomination was protected in the legal personality of Deity
Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Deity as Ruler protected the pious purpose of entire Hindu Religious denomination by issuing the historic Temple Entry Proclamation on Nov 12th 1936 through his Shri Padmanabha Dasa
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement lead by Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity Himself reclaim Art 26 protection for pious purpose of thousands of years of worshippers belonging to Hindu Religious denomination &end #pecularism practiced in name of secularism
Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement lead by Lord Chilkur Balaji Deity Himself took birth to secure the pious purpose of historic protest of Lord Ayyappa devotees for Art 26 protection of pious purpose of worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination
With His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn rep of Nation's Dharma following principles of Dharma having referred Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement representation to Ministry of Home Affairs request devotees to join appeal to Hon'ble PM @narendramodi ji
Hindu Religious denomination Worshippers rep by Kanchi Paramacharya worked to insert Art 26 for protection of pious purpose of Sampradaya legal personality of Hindu Deities let us make reclaiming Art 26 right which existed 26th Jan 1950 our pious purpose
The origin of "Pecularism" can be dated to the day when the Union Govt in 1951 lead by late Shri Pandit Nehru did not respect the dharmik advice of then Hon'ble President late Shri Rajendra Prasad ji and gave assent to the draconian Madras Endowments Act of 1951 against Art 26
Worshippers belonging to Hindu Religious denomination join us in appeal to Hon'ble PM @narendramodi to rectify "pecularism" practiced in the name of "secularism" by fulfilling pious purpose of his own April 18th 2019 dharmik promise which secured victory.
To prevent diversion of Deity lands happening in every state against pious purpose of ancient donors we need to reclaim Art 26 protection for pious purpose of worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination goal of Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement
Along with supporting above appeal please also support Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement to address the root cause of this "pecularism" problem that impacts only Hindu Temples.
Worshippers belonging to Hindu Religious denomination are all over Bharath the Secular Govt of TN should advertise such diversion all over Bharath it is not enough to ask for objections in some local news papers. We should ask that such info be put in SM.
Every Hindu temple of Bharath whichever State it is in belongs to the Worshippers of Hindu Religious denomination of Bharath and the pious purpose of the entire denomination is vested in the Deity and protected by Art 26 from external Secular State threat need to educate this.
Hindu Kings belonging to worshipper of Hindu Religious denomination of Bharath for thousands of years made donations vested in Hindu Deities. Vijayanagara & Maratha Kings protected Sanatana Dharma at most difficult times they may be no more but their pious purpose lives in Deity