Social media users are sharing a link to the Michigan election night reporting website to incorrectly claim that Donald Trump still leads the state. Although this is the official site, the website is updated from local results and appears to lag behind other reporting outlets.
Voters should look to local election officials for latest unofficial results, a list of which is available here - michigan.gov/sos/0,4670,7-1….
All major networks have called the Michigan election for Joe Biden, with 99% of results reported. We are currently seeing viral spread across TikTok, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit, and Facebook.
This has been further confirmed by the Michigan Secretary of State:
We have observed false claims that “real” ballots have so-called “non-radioactive” isotope watermarks on them. Watermarks can be on mail-in ballots, but that does not mean they are used to target voters maliciously or as a method to conduct election fraud. [1/6]
Depending on which state you voted in, your ballot may have a watermark. Ballots are printed with watermarks to help with authentication. Watermarks distinguish official ballots from potentially counterfeit ballots. [2/6] sos.ca.gov/administration…
Several fact checkers have already debunked claims about “non-radioactive” isotope watermarks. [3/6] factcheck.org/2020/11/bogus-…
1/ A new Project Veritas video is spreading on social media with an alleged whistleblower from Traverse City, Michigan. There is no evidence to support the claims made in the video. Elections and the vote counting process in Michigan continue to be safe and secure.
2/ The video features a “whistleblower” purported to work at the Barlow Branch USPS in Traverse City. He claims that the morning of 11/4, he and colleagues received a directive from a supervisor to postmark ballots with the previous date, 11/3. This remains unverified.
3/ These claims have gone viral in large part due to conservative influencers on Twitter, including Donald Trump Jr., James O’Keefe (Project Veritas’s founder), Mike Coudrey (a conservative investor), and Tom Fitton (Judicial Watch’s president and a pro-Trump activist).
1/ Last week, we predicted we'd see “premature declarations of victory.” This prediction came true in Trump’s press conference on Tue night, when he falsely claimed he won the election. We look at which breaking news headlines covered his claim accurately eipartnership.net/rapid-response…
2/ To understand how this claim of victory was framed by media, our research team analyzed headlines from breaking news stories that mentioned the claim in the hour after the press conference.
3/ Fortunately, many media organizations either corrected or qualified Trump’s statement in their headlines. Some used direct corrections, such as the common “falsely claims,” whereas others used qualifications, such as “despite uncounted votes.”
1/ According to @washingtonpost, many of the 300k ballots w/no delivery scan from USPS were most likely pulled by hand for expedited delivery & delivered without a scan. Those ballots would be unlikely to flip state-level results, even if missing. washingtonpost.com/business/2020/…
2/ Tweets alleging that the ballots can sway election results are false.
The number of untracked ballots is less than the remaining margins in all outstanding races: even if all of those ballots were missing and were for the trailing candidate, they wouldn’t make a difference.
3/ You may also be seeing this same scanning issue appear in different locals. For ex., the story at 27% of mail-in ballots in Florida being missing is misleading for this exact same reason. There was no delivery scan and were most likely pulled by hand for expedited delivery.
1/ Sharp increases in vote counts, seen in MI & other states, for both parties, reflect the way differences in party preference for in-person and mail in voting and the way votes are tallied. They are not evidence of fraud.
2/ False claims made on Twitter, Reddit, Facebook, and in right-leaning websites, like the Gateway Pundit, in memes, and in English and Spanish, falsely alleged that jumps in vote counts for Biden implied fraudulent ballots.
3/ Other claims, suggesting that over 100k ballots for Biden and 0 for Trump, were based on a glitch at Decision Desk, according to their partner Vox: such an imbalanced count was not added to official tallies. vox.com/recode/2020/11…
1/ There is no evidence of a plot to disenfranchise voters by passing out sharpies at polling stations. Election officials provide voters with allowable writing implements. We have been tracking #sharpiegate as it propagates across platforms (screenshot of a removed tiktok 👇)
2/ In many states, sharpies can be used without issue, depending on the type of tabulation system used. In rare cases, there may be concerns of ink bleeding through. These concerns can be addressed by hand counting ballots per state voter intent laws. ncsl.org/research/elect…
3/ The graph put together by our team @uwicp demonstrates the precipitous spike in these narratives today. These claims are meant to stoke fears of uncertainty and distrust in the overall results. students.washington.edu/schaferj/elect…