An update post lockdown. Unfortunately, we don't have Google mobility data post-Oct 30th (start date of the lockdown) yet, so let's look at how hospital data changed since then. Quick thread.
From worse to better, let's start with ICU. Incidence and non-parametric fit.
I certainly can't see any change.
Confirmed by the statistical analysis of "R" for ICU data which is still hovering around 1.2
Hospital incidence now.
Same, conclusion: the curve looks the same.
Confirmed again by R estimate still around 1.2... BUT we can see a tiny little improvement in R.
Now if you remember the original thread, I found that cases and ICU/Hospitals were lagged vs. cases and also that any impact on mobility would need 8-14 days to show in hospital data. So we should see more effects of lockdown in cases. What do we have? This.
Ok, I realise it's not obvious, but the ugly exponential now looks slightly more like an ugly straight line. Not great, but is it better? R estimates for cases confirm it's better.
R is only slightly above 1 now.
BUT - and this is a BIG BUT (!) the drop in R is almost perfectly synchronized with school closures due to the school holidays.
So you have two ways of seeing this.
1) the lockdown is working and we just need to wait a bit to see the impact on hospital data
2) the schools closing drove R down... reopening it during the lockdown means the whole thing will fail.
For now, I can't tell from the data which is right. Maybe Google data will help
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tomorrow is the end of the grace period for fentanyl-related tariffs (Canada Mexico), China ones r supposed to start on March 12. Time to look at some numbers. So far Trump has enacted 10% “fentanyl” tariffs on Chinese goods, enacted and cancelled 25% on Columbia and threatened :
Canada, Mexico (25% goods + 10% Canadian energy), China (+10% addtl), 25% steel & aluminium worldwide, “fees” for Chinese ships/freight operators, “reciprocal tariffs” (whatever that means) for all nations + 25% autos pharma & lumber, + unknown % on copper.
We’ll know more after the report on ‘America First Trade Policy’ on April 1st, especially on "reciprocal ones", but here are few thoughts from a great Autonomous report on this.
Some historical perspective: maybe raising tariffs in the early 1920 wasn’t a great idea?
You should watch the full unedited version of this unreal press conference All going as expected (Trump w/ his weird obsessions, Z trying to stay cool, Rubio wishing he was in bed) until it totally blows up bc Z can't help correcting Vance about diplomacy
The best summary of the twisted world we live in is how Trump ends the press conference:
"This is going to be great television"
You can't make it up
Also : the journalist who asked the suit question should really look at himself in the mirror tonight bc it clearly contributed to the unravelling of the meeting
This is pure gold, Greek edition.
How did Eurobank achieve such an increase in capital ratios, in Q3 24? The trick is in the +99bps.
Which comes from a mysterious decrease of 2.4bn€ in RWA. But how? Deleveraging?
Oh no, that would be hard work. I’ve got a better idea.
Thread.
It’s obviously the ICAP CRIF CQS, you idiot. Err, what?
Here’s the explanation, & it’s beautiful.
Under Basel/EU rules, banks using the standard approach (no internal ratings) have capital charges (RWA) based on external ratings which are then mapped on so-called “Credit Quality Steps” that give RWA using this table.
BNP has very good notes on the US elections and how to trade them. They are mostly focused on timing and the info you should focus on. Here's my summary
Before the elections
Apart from betting markets / polls, a source of info is mail-in ballot statistics.
Early voting doesn’t favor the Dems as much as 2020 (but Covid).
Before the elections
Some states - notably Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan North Carolina - start counting on Nov 5th. They are important states so could provide info.
Maybe you’ve seen the crazy price action on Close Brothers last Friday or heard about the Hopcraft appeal court ruling and its impact for UK banks.
What is it about?
I’ll try to explain why it’s important but not Armageddon.
This is all about getting financing when you buy a car, more precisely getting so-called “Point of sale” financing, i.e. the car dealer acts as broker for the actual bank or finance company providing the loan.
Back in 2021 the FCA banned a dubious practice: the broker’s fee was higher if the loan rate was higher, i.e. there was an incentive to propose a bad client deal. The Financial Ombudsman Service ruled (on pre-ban sales) with an indication of how redress should be calculated.