Powerful letter from the Commissioner on Standards in Public Life, Peter Riddell, warning of ministerial attempts to "pack" interview panels and reward political allies with public appointments, in ways "expressly barred" by the Cabinet Office Code. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
The letter also warns of an increase in unregulated appointments, and the rewarding of political allies with seats on the Boards of Government Departments.
"Some at the centre of government want not only to have the final say but to tilt the competition system in their favour to appoint their allies". Leaking favoured candidates for jobs (eg BBC Chair) discourages others from applying. Letter summarised here: civilserviceworld.com/news/article/w…
CORRECTION: in the rush to tweet, I accidentally described Peter Riddell as the Commissioner for Standards in Public Life. He is in fact the Commissioner for Public Appointments, writing *to* the Committee on Standards in Public Life. Apologies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a dazzling piece of writing. It's also one of the few critiques of Boris Johnson that thinks seriously about why he appeals to so many voters, and what that means for the future of British democracy.
@RoryStewartUK on Boris Johnson: Britain's "carnival lord of misrule".
This is a crucial point. Voters aren't fooled by Johnson: they know exactly what he is, but they vote for him anyway. Understanding why may be the key to defeating him in future.
Johnson's model isn't Pericles; it's Loki. It's probably no coincidence that the rogueish trickster remains one of the most loved villains in the Marvel universe.
Lord Judge's speech yesterday offered a passionate defence of two constitutional principles: the Rule of Law; and the Sovereignty of Parliament. The Internal Market Bill is a danger to both principles. Some quotes follow. [THREAD]
2. Judge began with a robust endorsement of parliamentary sovereignty. What followed was not an appeal for judicial power, but a plea for MPs to stop lifting government above the laws that Parliament itself has made.
3. As Judge pointed out, the government has become dangerously fond of "Henry VIII clauses" & other procedures, that give ministers the right to amend or repeal laws passed by Parliament. If you believe in the sovereignty of parliament, you don't take Henry VIII as a role model.
I'm going to tweet out some of the documents on which this article draws, tracing Margaret Thatcher's response to German reunification & its aftermath. Thatcher was an expressive writer & annotator of documents, many of which are available online. [THREAD] newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
1. This one's from Sept 1989, when Thatcher met Gorbachev for talks on the situation in Eastern Europe. She asked for the recording to be switched off, so she could speak freely about Germany. NATO commitments to unification, she said, shd be "disregarded" margaretthatcher.org/document/112005
2. Thatcher was not impressed by Francis Fukuyama's prediction of "the end of history" (or of "the Common Marketization of international relations"!). She annotated his work in detail, and warned that "there are always evils in the world to be opposed." margaretthatcher.org/document/211165
We're delighted to announce the winners of the @MileEndInst's inaugural Undergraduate Research Prize. It's a pleasure to be able to showcase such outstanding student work, esp in such a difficult year for researchers. The winners have blogged about their work below. [Drumroll...]
In alphabetical order, our first prize-winner is EMMA DAVIES (@emmaxdaviess), on "Historicising Black Lives Matter: The Nigerian Women's War of 1929". Emma compares BLM with colonial protests in the British Empire and calls for new approaches to the past. qmul.ac.uk/mei/news-and-o…
Continuing down the alphabet, our next prize winner is JOHANNES-MAXIMILIAN GLAHS, with a post on "Why we should forget about the UN to begin tackling climate change". "Climate Clubs", he argues, offer a more effective basis for action on climate change. qmul.ac.uk/mei/news-and-o…
Why was Margaret Thatcher so afraid of German reunification? Why did a lifelong anti-Communist turn to the Soviet Union for support? And what lessons might be learned for Brexit Britain? My latest for the @NewStatesman. newstatesman.com/politics/uk/20…
Margaret Thatcher on "the German national character".
Britain's tendency to view its relationship with Europe through the lens of the Second World War has a long and undistinguished history.
Good piece, as ever, by @NickCohen4 on the collapse of meritocracy. Though I'd see it slightly differently: I think Cummings passionately believes that he is *constructing* a meritocracy, in a way that demonstrates the problems with that concept. [THREAD] theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
2. Cummings sees himself as a meritocrat. His blog drips with contempt for the calibre of civil servants, MPs & ministers. He rages against an out-dated "establishment", that shuts out mavericks & rewards low-wattage arts graduates, with no understanding of science or innovation.
3. The govt is stocked with people, like Cummings, who think that their own merits went unrewarded: ministers who were sacked; diplomats whose careers stalled; and lawyers who never made partner. They see themselves as victims of a rigged "establishment", not of "meritocracy".