It's now a week since Jeremy Corbyn was suspended from the British Labour Party for telling the truth. Let's remember some of the episodes that didn't merit suspension from this august party:

1) Charging a dictator £5 million p/a to help spin away massacres of civilians
2) Lying to parliament about your knowledge of, and complicity in, CIA torture flights
3) Sounding the racist foghorn with talk of asylum seekers "swamping" British schools (even the Tory shadow home secretary, Oliver Letwin, said that David Blunkett's language was wrong)
4) 12 years later, sounding the foghorn again when a Tory politician uses the same language, backing Michael Fallon up with a column in the Daily Mail, no less, when David Cameron has already rebuked him for his comments
5) An exception to the rule: Phil Woolas actually *was* suspended from the Labour Party when the courts found him to be a racist liar and expelled him from parliament. Phew!

(He was allowed back in a few months later.)
6) However, no Labour MP was suspended—or reprimanded in any way—when they lined up, one after the other, to express their solidarity with Woolas in his moment of shame, branding Harriet Harman as a "disgrace" for her criticism of Woolas
7) Tom Watson told us he had "lost sleep thinking about poor old Phil Woolas", a "bright working-class lad done well" who had responded with "customary grace" when he was sanctioned for being a racist liar. Was Watson suspended? Have a wild guess.
8) Margaret Hodge was accused by her own party colleague Alan Johnson of "using the language of the BNP". The BNP themselves were delighted and praised Hodge to the hilt. Period of suspension: no weeks, no days, no hours, no minutes—nada.
9) And another one from TB (you could fill an album with these)—meeting Italy's far-right leader Salvini for a "friendly" meeting, in his capacity as travelling salesman for another Central Asian dictatorship. Blair is still a member of the Labour Party in good standing.
10) The list could be extended: suffice it to say, Corbyn's suspension brings to mind Groucho Marx's comment about clubs that would have him as a member. He was always too good for Labour (& for the fairweather pals who won't defend him unconditionally today). The rest is noise.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniel Finn

Daniel Finn Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanFinn95

29 Oct
Going to take an overnight break from the state of British Labour politics, simultaneously sinister and shambolic. But for the road, this is something I wrote about Labour after Corbyn before Starmer's victory that tried to look at the bigger picture. 1/

jacobinmag.com/2020/04/jeremy…
This seems right enough in hindsight (except perhaps for the bit about Starmer paving the way for a "more right-wing successor"—his 10 pledges have already been junked, there might be no need for that). *But* there's a second part to this argument ... 2/
The Kinnock–Blair 80s-90s mutation of the Labour Party wasn't just about inner-party battles, or even the general course of British history: it was very much part of a global picture. 3/
Read 6 tweets
29 Oct
"I asked an NEC member could he give me a specific reason for Corbyn's suspension. He said he didn't like it, but he'd have to go along with it."
The clown car circles round to pick up the guys from YouGov and the FT. Since the man who suspended Corbyn can't or won't say why he did it, this is about as meaningful as asking them if a goal should have been disallowed in a match they didn't see.

Read 4 tweets
5 Oct
Not surprised to find this compendium of nonsense from Helen Lewis being used to justify a guilt-by-association-with-good-people (Corbyn, Ilhan Omar) attack on AOC. Her list of "alarming incidents": 1 lie, 1 exaggeration, 1 inversion of reality, 2 non sequiturs. Standard fare.
The lie: Corbyn said nothing about "British Zionists" in general. The exaggeration: referring to a casual Facebook comment as "support". The inversion: Corbyn and Jennie Formby tackled the "slow handling of complaints" by their factional opponents. The non sequiturs: IHRA, EHRC.
Lewis herself admits further down that the "the [IHRA] definition of anti-Semitism that Corbyn refused to accept last year focused on Israel" (but suppresses the import of that fact). As for the EHRC, we're not hearing much about their report these days; funny how that goes, eh?
Read 4 tweets
17 Aug
Translation: there's important work to be done purging the universities of dissent til Spectator Thought is the only accredited doctrine, so RDE is willing to put her usual fierce moral clarity about (one side of) the Troubles on ice in the name of a higher cause.
Their intellectual Freikorps needs "warriors", so they can't afford to be picky. All that moralistic huffing and puffing about the Provos suddenly forgotten; there might be students who don't think Douglas Murray is one of the great minds of our time, so that takes priority.
RDE was gushing in her praise for Tom Bower's "biography" of Corbyn, which—as Peter Oborne showed—was a risible, intellectually degraded farrago, with a generous helping of xenophobic coat-trailing. Again, the ends justify the means for Edwards, it seems.

middleeasteye.net/opinion/tom-bo…
Read 4 tweets
9 Aug
This sounds superficially radical, but it's ultimately another variation on "nothing to see here". Let's get a clear picture of what the "disgruntled officers" (and their faction as a whole) actually did, and then we can judge whether Corbyn should have been able to defeat them.
The national broadcaster paraded some of those "disgruntled officers" before the British public as "whistleblowers" who had taken a courageous stand against racism. Starmer has endorsed that image by giving them a big payout. A clear-eyed look at their record is long overdue.
This also misrepresents the dynamic: it's not that you have the Labour right here, and the other entrenched interests and obstacles over there. Labour's right faction is linked by countless threads to all of those interests (not least the "deep state").

Read 4 tweets
7 Aug
Imagine—just imagine—if pro-Corbyn Labour staffers had been caught making fun of Luciana Berger, say, after discovering she was crying in a toilet because of online abuse. And that they boasted about texting a journalist to let them know. It would be front-page news for weeks.
No question whatsoever: every detail of that conversation would be emblazoned across front pages and TV bulletins at great length, and journalists would be camped outside Corbyn's house demanding that he condemn it and apologize for having ever employed such rotten individuals.
Anyone who paid the least bit of attention to the news would know about it. It would be presented as a damning indictment of Corbyn's entire movement. Instead, we get a handful of stories which uncritically foreground the excuses of the guilty parties and soft-soap what they did.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!