I have, at my finger tips, the data for everyone in seven key states who requested an absentee ballot or voted early. AZ, GA, MI, NC, NV, PA, WI.
I also have the ability to run this against the Social Security Death Index and 1/4
the National Change of Address Database.
Matches of the ABS/EV voters against the SSDI/NCOA list would indicate fraud.
However, I've had zero luck either penetrating the Trump campaign or the RNC, or otherwise getting the support needed to run this analysis. I can do it on 2/4
my own (~$100k or less in expenses from data vendors) or Trump/RNC/DataTrust should be able to do this with material they *should* have on hand (or they can cut the meager check and buy the data for this now). 3/4
Anyway, hit the 'retweet' button. Maybe someone who can help with this will see it and reach out to me. 4/4
Just one other note - the cost of the data is solely to pay L2Political (the best of the best with this kind of stuff). I'm not asking for a *nickel* personally.
Yet one more note: Discovering just a *few* matches to the Death List would indicate a much bigger problem as ABS/EV requests of dead voters would be incidental to a larger fraud operation.
Per request, here's a GoFundMe to help pay for this:
Update: The 100k was reached. On GFM, I've increased it to $250k; the money will be devoted to call centers to run down inactive/less active or moved voters marked as voting. We'll get any who said they didn't vote to sign an affidavits, then hand to LEO/prosecutors/FBI/press.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a good first step, but it will require additional steps unlike any other our country has taken. Let me explain.🧵
The reason that drug prices are lower in Canada, India, etc., is because their governments sets a cap on those prices, but they aren't capped here in the US.
So all of the costs and any profit a drug company wants to make has to come almost entirely from the United States.
This results in a massive freeloader problem, where drug development for the entire world is financed by US consumers.
Now, because of Trump's actions, the drug companies are going to have to try to raise prices in those other markets -- and they're likely to fail because...
In late 2020, I shared evidence with @FBI agents that ActBlue was funding Hamas and laundering money.
Not only did they do nothing, but when I raised the issue again in 2022, I was urged to remain silent.
And still, nothing has happened. But today, I go public. 👇
I'm sharing the report I submitted to the FBI documenting ActBlue funding an organization run by five state-department designated terrorists groups, including Hamas.
ActBlue disabled their credit card verification process so that as long as the card numbers are valid, the name and address don't need to match the actual card owner's.
No other donation platform allows this, and it results in higher transaction fees.
Why?
My research on this was the basis of the report from Take Back America that was publicized on Fox News.
This is a chart I created that was part of the report.
Employer is required to be reported, but if you are donating in the name of someone you don't know, you probably don't know the name of their actual employer - so you leave it blank, report retired/unemployed.
🧵Today, I got a message from supporter of @LookAheadOrg disheartened by the continued over-prosecution and unfair treatment of nonviolent participants in the J6 protests and disappointed our org was not able to do more.
I shared the disappointment, and this was my response:
@LookAheadOrg Look Ahead America did not exist on January 6th, 2021.
Despite that, we let the fight for Justice for J6 this way:
- Held 70 rallies and vigils to successfully reshape public opinion about is happening. This was a measurable shift.
@LookAheadOrg - Built the most comprehensive database of the political prisoners, including data on how donors could support them.
Short analysis of the voting location issues in Maricopa and how they affected Ds versus Rs.
1. It's not possible to precisely analyze if the issues happened disproportionately to Republicans based on voting location because voters had the option to vote anywhere in the county; they were not restricted on where they could vote based on their home precinct.
2. The data to analyze what the partisan leaning of a polling location is not available. Results are not tabulated by polling location and the location where someone voted is not tabulated, so we can't analyze based on voting location election results or party reg of voters.