In civil litigation, if one party destroys evidence, the judge issues an "adverse inference" instruction
That allows the jury to assume that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the party that destroyed it
What should we do when Democrats kick out poll watchers?
That allows the jury to assume that the evidence would have been unfavorable to the party that destroyed it
What should we do when Democrats kick out poll watchers?
Media commentators keep saying "there's no evidence of voter fraud!"
But that gets it backwards
If a party kicks poll watchers out of their count, the presumption should be that they are committing fraud, and the burden on them to prove otherwise
But that gets it backwards
If a party kicks poll watchers out of their count, the presumption should be that they are committing fraud, and the burden on them to prove otherwise
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
