Advocate for Commissioner of Police, arrayed as Respondent no. 3 points out to the Court that since there are no allegations against the Commissioner, he should be removed as a party.
Sr. Adv. Harish Salve appearing for #ArnabGoswami intervenes that he is yet to make submissions
Salve: I will not remove your name, I am yet to argue and submit to the court my case. Let me start first.
Salve asks Ponda’s junior to read the reasons for rejecting police custody in the final paragraphs of the order.
Salve continues.
Salve: I have placed on record the discussion which took place in the assembly.
The discussion relates to generally the journalistic work of #ArnabGoswami, singular salulation to CM, his cabinet ministers and other respective members..
Salve: .. deliberate breach of privilege, whatever this means.
Mr. Bhujbal said something and then discussion goes on.
Court: We hear you, but our assignment (matter assignments) does not allow us to hear Bail applications.
Salve: Milords I am challenging the proceedings, the initiation of proceedings.
But the High Court has powers even under Art. 226 to grant bail.
Court: Maybe move a precipe with the administrative side and get this reassigned.
Salve: No milords I am saying, you are seized under 226. This is 226 read with 438.
Those constitutional powers Milords have.
Court: What about the revision application?
Ponda: Milords they have challenged the remand order for custody, and not on the facts.
Sr. Adv. Shirish Gupte appearing for Adnya Naik submits on state’s instructions that the entire order has been challenged.
Salve: Even so, even if entire order is challenged, my point is why should he be in Jail. This is a matter of 2019.
Nothing has happened from 2019 to today, what will happen now and from now to Diwali?
Salve: If the root is tainted by illegality then it is important to note that the result will be too.
Salve: Whether he will go on his channel and say things against Parambir Singh (Commissioner of Mumbai Police)? Yes he will. But will that hamper this investigation? No.
Court: But why habeas corpus?
Salve: Because milords when we approached this court, he was in illegal detention.
Technically habeas corpus may not lie because there is an order of Magistrate for judicial custody.
Ponda: We had submitted the bail application, but then the Magistrate said reply can be filed in due course, which could have gone till the end of 14 days. So we submitted a purshis and withdrew the application.
Court: And there is an interim bail application here?
Ponda: Yes, there is an interim application here.
Court: what is the normal course for bail?
Ponda: Technically it is with the sessions, but then we had moved before the Magistrate and then now there is a revision.
Court: And is it normal course to approach the High Court for bail directly?
Ponda: The source of power is the Kartar Singh and Girish Suneja matter.
Court: Let Salve continue with his judgments.
Salve: Those are the very cases, Mr. Ponda is citing.
Salve: Whatever little I know of criminal law is through Mr. Ponda and Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Desai.
Court: Which is why we insisted on hearing the other side too Mr. Salve!
Ponda proceeds to cite judgment Girish Suneja v. CBI
Ponda: The third and final judgment is Kartar Singh. We have already quoted imp paras (Para 359 and 368) in the Suneja judgment.
Ponda also asks the Court to note Imtiaz Ahmad from the Asian Resurfacing judgment.
Ponda reiterates that the power to grant stay of investigation and trial is a very extraordinary power given to High Courts and the same power is to be exercised sparingly only to prevent an abuse of the process.
Court: Mr. Ponda what we propose to do is we want to continue this tomorrow.
We have to hear the other side also.
We will start the hearing at 11 am, the other side will argue only on the limited arguments which are made by the petitioner counsels.
Salve: May I request that hearing may start at 12 tomorrow (referring to time difference)
Court: Yes, of course.
We also have to hear Mr. Vaidyanathan too.
Court records consent of parties to continue the hearing tomorrow at 12 pm.
Court asks Ponda to move the IA on the administrative to ensure that the application is assigned to us.
Ponda: We will make a sincere attempt.
Court asks all parties to limit their submissions tomorrow only with respect to the interim application.
Hearing ends for today. Will be continued tomorrow at 12 pm.
Arrest of Arnab Goswami: Bombay High Court hears habeas corpus plea [LIVE UPDATES]
#BombayHighCourt will hear plea filed by #ArnabGoswami challenging his illegal arrest and wrongful detention by the Maharashtra Police for his role in abetting a suicide today.
Bench of Justices SS Shinde and MS Karnik will commence hearing at 12 pm
#BombayHighCourt Full Bench will clarify on the issue of whether emergency (COVID-19) parole can be granted to a convict under the POCSO Act as per the Maharashtra Prisons Parole Rules.
Bench of Justices KK Tated, GS Kulkarni and NR Borkar will announce the verdict shortly.
Pronouncement begins.
Court: The case of ‘Sardar s/o. Shawali Khan’, is the correct interpretation of Rule 19 of the Maharashtra Prison Rules and the proviso under Rule 19 covers the POCSO Act.
Court directed the matter to be placed before the appropriate bench after their decision.
Delhi High Court begins hearing on Mohit Saraf-Rajiv Luthra dispute #SarafvLuthra#DelhiHC
The Court had earlier asked the parties to try mediation to resolve their differences and appointed Senior Advocate Sriram Panchu as the mediator. On Monday, Justice V Kameswar Rao was informed that mediation had failed.
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi arguing for Saraf. Speaks about 90-day notice for expulsion from firm.