Man. AOC out here responding to left-punching with "be more good at politics, whiners." You honestly love to see it.
And if you want to know what AOC thinks about left messaging, just do a Twitter search on the terms she puts in quotes in this tweet. She knows what she's doing here, and what she's talking about.
A couple more things here: First, AOC didn't pick this fight, on this day. Spanberger chose to bring this to AOC's door, and it would have been malpractice for her to stay silent. Mad about infighting? Go be mad at Spanberger.
Also, AOC is explicitly pivoting AWAY from a factional argument. Yes, she's saying you need to respect the base, but she's not making a zero-sum case. Want to run as a centrist? AOC is saying, "Fine. Do that. But don't kick other Dems, and don't forget to door-knock, either."
There's a candidate making a big-tent argument here, and it's the candidate of the left.
Let me make this part a bit more explicit.
Here's AOC's tweet history on the word "defund." When "Defund ICE" was an important part of left messaging, she tweeted about it all the time. "Defund the police"? Very different story. twitter.com/search?q=from%…
Does that mean she repudiated it, or ran from it? No. She explicitly defended it as an organizing tool and an activist rallying cry. But she didn't use the term herself, because she understands her role in the national conversation.
AOC isn't out here pushing "defund the police" as a Democratic Party slogan, but she's also not trashing activists who are organizing around it. She understands that doing that is doing the GOP's work for them.
Ideology aside, AOC is very very very good at politics. Period.
And again, did AOC mention Spanberger by name here? She did not. Did she point out that Spanberger herself is (based on reports I'm seeing from her district) bad at the kind of retail shoe-leather politics she's talking about? No, she didn't.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Angus Johnston

Angus Johnston Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @studentactivism

7 Nov
The kid wanted to practice guitar, and couldn't find a pick. The closest substitute I could find was an 1800-year-old Roman coin I bought in a cheap lot of uncleaned coins this summer. She's using it now.

Sometimes life is beautiful.
The coin, BTW. Image
Read 4 tweets
7 Nov
The first you should always look for in a "Biden should pardon Trump" thinkpiece is whether the author acknowledges that presidents cannot pardon people for violations of state law. If they do not, the rest of the piece isn't worth reading.

Carli Pierson does not. Keep moving.
We're going to be seeing a LOT of these in the next few months, with the premise that if Biden doesn't pardon, it'll "put Trump in front of the news cameras for the next four years, battling potential criminal and civil charges." But a federal pardon does nothing to prevent that.
Richard Nixon wasn't facing prosecution in state courts, so Ford's pardon—for better or worse—closed the book on his legal exposure. But that's not an outcome that Biden has the power to bring about.
Read 5 tweets
6 Nov
In terms of when to expect a call generally, PA and AZ are clearly trending up, and will be called when the margin passes a certain threshold (Likely 0.5%.) NV and AZ are more about reducing ambiguity by continuing to count.
My own sense is that Georgia is so close with so few outstanding votes that no call is coming anytime soon. Pennsylvania is chugging inexorably toward a call, likely this afternoon or evening.
Nevada and Arizona are a bit more opaque, since the direction in which the votes are trending is still more ambiguous. If I had to guess based on everything I've seen, I'd say NV is currently a lot closer to a call than AZ.
Read 5 tweets
31 Oct
Folks are offering this quote as a counterpoint to my read on the above, but I don't think it is. (Stipulating, of course, to the fact that searching for an intellectual throughline in a Trump speech is a mug's game.)
Trump has been saying for weeks that the outcome that matters is the Election Night outcome—that whoever's ahead then is the legitimate winner and that if the lead shifts thereafter it's not just suspect but presumptively illegitimate. But that's not what he's saying here!
Read 5 tweets
31 Oct
My favorite Connery movie ever is Robin and Marian (1976), which imagines what happens when Robin Hood comes returns from two decades on the Crusades to a Nottingham in which he's been turned into a myth.
Richard Harris plays Richard the Lionheart as an addled, vicious despot and the movie's Crusades are a genocidal, pointless war of empire, and that's just the first fifteen minutes.
When Robin gets back to Nottingham, he reconciles with Marian—a transcendent, angry, and age-appropriate (!) Audrey Hepburn in one of her last roles—and tries to construct a life of meaning and honor out of the pieces of his legend.
Read 6 tweets
30 Oct
Any idea what "4 Justices (plus1)" is supposed to mean here? I mean, other than "five justices." I feel like there's a secret Trumpworld code thing I'm missing in this tweet.
Before RBG's death, I'd have assumed that if Trump was talking smack about "4 Justices (plus1)," he meant the four liberals and Roberts, but that doesn't work anymore, and no obvious alternate explanation springs to mind. Maybe liberals plus Roberts are the four?
I guess that's it, right? The four justices he assumes will vote against him, plus whichever of the loyal five happens to defect in his nightmare scenario.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!