Now that this election is in the bag, let me discuss something I think Dems might benefit from:
In 2015, before Trump rode down the golden escalator, a client of mine grew concerned that Dems were losing races in towns where the party had an outsized voter advantage.
These towns were largely white, so this thread applies largely to this cohort. (AA women delivered for the Dems -- AGAIN -- in ways that white people never have in my lifetime. And we need to dispel the notion that Latinos are a monolith, but that's a thread for another day.)
Polling could not explain the phenomenon of why Dems were not winning there. So we did focus groups. Lots and lots of focus groups. And here is what we heard from these Dem and Dem-leaning independents, especially women:
"Yes, we are Dems but you guys spend an awful lot of time focusing on gun safety." (The gun safety message really popped in polling that year). "And while we are all for gun safety, we are drowning here."
"How do we pay for our kids to go to college, pay our taxes and pay for our elderly parents to get the care they need? It's too expensive to live our life every day. And little Timmy needs new turf shoes for soccer."
They actually cared about what the S&P rating was for their local municipalities and counties because they viewed it as an impartial metric of fiscal responsibility. So we reframed the messaging for the next election to focus on fiscal responsibility and we started winning.
These people were not MAGA voters and they weren't woke voters. They cared about social justice issues but they weren't visceral about them because didn't have time to focus on them. They were too worried about making ends meet every day for their families.
Since then, I have sat in many focus groups with this same cohort. The message hasn't changed. They hate Trump's rhetoric but it is not the defining thing. They will absorb socially unacceptable rhetoric if they feel someone is listening to their pleas for help to get by.
These people don't have time to focus on politics the way many of us do. They are just trying to get by day to day, which is tough. The Democratic Party needs to acknowledge this and stop listening to the loudest voices in the room. Start listening to these people instead.
Because these people aren't loud. They won't give you their opinion unless you ask. And when they do, they whisper, they don't yell. And yet their message was loud and clear at the ballot box on Tuesday.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Julie Roginsky

Julie Roginsky Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @julieroginsky

6 Nov
They once roughed up my dad at the Spectrum for doing nothing more than rooting for the Canadiens at a Flyers game. I watched multiple fights break out outside a Genesis concert at Veterans Stadium. Don't mess with #Philly. Those people live to fight. inquirer.com/news/fox-news-…
I mean... it's Genesis. If hearing Invisible Tough drives you to violence, you just live to fight.
*Invisible Touch, I mean. There's nothing "tough" about that song.
Read 4 tweets
21 Jan
Media guide to enabling more workplace toxicity: 1. Speculate that women who speak up might be doing it just to further a powerful man’s agenda. (“What?? I’m just asking questions others raise!”). 2.Question her motives for coming forward. 3. Wonder why more women don’t speak up.
I remember this dynamic playing out when @GretchenCarlson came forward. “What? She must obviously have an axe to grind. It can’t be that she was actually retaliated against for refusing to put up with a toxic work environment.”
And, of course, when I filed my own lawsuit against Fox. “She’s clearly doing this because she’s a Democrat who’s trying to take down Fox News. It can’t be that she has a legitimate cause.”
Read 4 tweets
20 Nov 19
Media, please stop saying that Lt. Colonel Vindman is “Ukrainian-born.” He is Soviet-born. Yes, he was born in what is now an independent Ukraine but Ukraine’s geo-political status today bears little resemblance to the Soviet Union, from which Vindman and his family emigrated. /1
I was born in Moscow but I am not “Russian-born.” I am Soviet-born. Like me, Vindman was a Soviet Jew. Trust me when I say that Soviet Jews in the 1970s had little reason to be loyal to their homeland and have no reason to be loyal to its successor independent nations. /2
Questioning any immigrant’s patriotism — especially one who has devoted his life in service of this nation — is toxic. Questioning the patriotism of Soviet Jewish emigres whose families were the victims of totalitarian oppression, is especially unconscionable. /3
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!