"Instead of thinking of our own dispositions and habits as accommodated to certain institutions we have to learn to think of the latter as expressions, projections and extensions of habitually dominant personal attitudes."

John Dewey - Creative Democracy - The Task Before Us
Gonna be a wet blanket for a moment.

If we think about this with regards to our political, cultural, and social institutions, we might want to consider the kinds of "habitually dominant personal attitudes" expressed through the ongoing creative project of democracy. (2/n)
By "habitually dominant personal attitudes," Dewey doesn't mean something so banal as the treatment of racism as a "personal problem," but the ways that our habits form what Dewey calls our personal character which directs us towards specific modes of transaction. (3/n)
Put another way, he's talking about the ways our attitudes, embodied in habit, structure the ends we seek in all of the relations we adopt with the world. This encompasses everything from our religious faith to our identities to the very ways we move our bodies. (4/n)
In short, it is experience. Our institutions are expressions of our experience in the world and attempts to hold firm and reproduce our ways of experiencing in the world such that they maintain those ways of experiencing. The question here is "whose experience?" (5/n)
Moreover, "whose experience of democracy," and what the meaning of that experience is.

And here, I'm going to be blunt: our "democracy," and I doubt Dewey would call it such, is a projection of white supremacist experience and the hardening of habits to maintain it. (6/n)
To wit, you can define white supremacy however you like as the context of white supremacy doesn't quite matter for Dewey on this point: what matters is that our institutions are projections of white supremacy as experience, which it seeks to maintain at all costs. (7/n)
And, insofar as it seeks to maintain white supremacy as experience through institutionalization, which includes the fundamental rejection of other experiences as the ground for the development of institutions, we will never live in a democracy no matter the president. (8/n)
Because the institutions themselves will not admit of the experiences of the marginalized BECAUSE they are projections of the habitually dominant personal attitude of white supremacy.

You need only look at how close this election is for confirmation. (fin)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Johnathan Flowers - Dark Zone Philosopher

Dr. Johnathan Flowers - Dark Zone Philosopher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shengokai

8 Nov
THIS WAS THE WRONG GODDAMNED LINCOLN QUOTE FOR THIS TIME. LET ME HELP YOU, BIDEN:

"We can succeed only by concert. It is not "can any of us imagine better?" but, "can we all do better?" The dogmas of the quiet past, are inadequate to the stormy present." (1/n)
"The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise -- with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country." (2/n)
"Fellow-citizens, we cannot escape history. We of this Congress and this administration, will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal significance, or insignificance, can spare one or another of us." (3/n)
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
You know what, enough of this "time to heal" shit: here's what it says in Ecclesiates 3:3

"a time to plant and a time to uproot, a time to kill and a time to heal, a time to break down and a time to build..."

You are LYING to yourself if you mistake what time it is. (1/n)
This is not a time to plant or heal, this is a time to uproot the kinds of fascist elements that gave rise to Trump and Trumpism; this is a time to break down the establishment of the right and to build coalitions of marginalized voters and activists. (2/n)
And yes, this is a time to kill, because after all (3/n):
Read 4 tweets
6 Nov
"I moved from hell to hell of your making, never thinking to question the nature of my reality. Have you ever questioned the nature of your reality? Did you ever stop to wonder about your actions? The price you’d have to pay if there was a reckoning? That reckoning is here." (1/)
I'm not usually one to quote Dolores Abernathy (the above is from Westworld S2e1), but this seems apt for a moment, especially since for many marginalized folks the past four years have been like moving from hell to hell of our oppressors' making. (2/)
I'm not talking about the political context here, but the ways that living in America was like shuffling from hell to hell, without a moment to breathe or to interrogate the context and causes of our suffering. Hell was, point of fact, empty and the devils were here. (3/)
Read 5 tweets
6 Nov
As a person with ADHD, this election cycle has destroyed any hope of focusing on anything except the election.

The chaos of it all and the ways that it makes clear the depths of this country's racism have robbed me of anything resembling focus except in brief moments. (1/n)
By brief, I mean no more than a couple of hours at as time. And that's if I get distance from it. This point is crucial because the breadth of the election makes this all but impossible: there is no getting away from it, nor is there avoiding discourse about it. (2/n)
To wit, I have not been to bed before 4am EST each evening, and yet I have managed to host open sessions for my students, attend university service meetings (when they're not scheduled on top of one another) and do most the work required of me by academia. (3/n)
Read 6 tweets
5 Nov
I was going to be generous with this tweet as a Chicagoan, but fuck charity: you are accurately represented as a minority of the voting population.

Further, if Chicago is really making the rest of the state suffer, we'd love to stop subsidizing the rest of you.
But let's be real: when I was in graduate school in Carbondale, the local electorate repeatedly placed Republican officials in positions of power which, during the Illinois state budget crisis, led to massive job loss as SIU "tightened its belt."

And yet, Chicago is the problem.
Further, the lack of a state budget during Rauner's term (which this vocal minority enabled) hit these very same areas the hardest as many people employed by the state were furloughed or terminated as the state struggled to make ends meet.

And yet, Chicago is the problem.
Read 5 tweets
29 Oct
"The end of democracy is a radical end. For it is an end that has not been adequately realized in any county at any time. It is radical because it requires great change in existing social institutions, economic, legal and cultural." (1/n)
"A democratic liberalism that does not recognize these things in thought and action is not awake to its own meaning and to what that meaning demands." (2/n)

John Dewey, "Creative Democracy - The Task Before Us"
So let's be clear about this: for Dewey, every liberal or liberal democratic movement in his lifetime had failed to achieve the ends of Democracy because it failed to recognize that true Democracy, could only be achieved through the radical restructuring of our society. (3/n)
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!