Let's fact check the latest big voter-fraud claim: Software glitches misreported votes in Michigan.
Facts: One county caught and fixed an error in its unofficial tallies. This came even before a 2nd layer of thorough checks designed to catch such issues. freep.com/story/news/pol…
So: Yes, there was an error in the unofficial vote tally for one Michigan county.
And then county workers checked the numbers, discovered the error and fixed it. This was all before the official vote-count verification, which is more thorough & is designed to catch such issues.
We know this because of reporting by @paulegan4 at the Detroit Free Press.
State officials said the error occurred because Antrim County didn't update its election-management software.
The vote count was accurate. The problem came when the unofficial tally went to the state.
Some other counties use the same software. The @freep reported that it was unclear if the state tracked whether other counties had updated their software.
(I would imagine/hope that there is now new scrutiny of unofficial tallies from counties that use this software.)
But remember: All of these counts are unofficial.
There is then an elaborate process in which two Republican and two Democratic "canvassers" certify the counts in each county, checking poll books, ballot summaries & tabulator tapes.
And then: There are additional layers! There are official processes for complaints, legal maneuvering, automatic recounts, etc. detroitnews.com/story/news/pol…
To summarize: In Antrim County, a software error did swing 5,500 votes for Biden in an unofficial count.
But the system of checks worked. County officials caught the error and fixed it. And that was before an additional layer of checks designed specifically to catch such issues.
The State of Michigan should be further scrutinizing any vote counts from counties that used that software, made by Dominion Voting Systems.
But does this sound like election fraud to you?
Here's how it's being framed by the president's children and other right-wing voices.
Hyperpartisan tweets from right-wing internet personalities about this have been shared hundreds of thousands of times, reaching millions of people.
When the Detroit Free Press tweeted the article that informed much of this thread, it was shared 10 times. freep.com/story/news/pol…
This illustrates massive issues in how the public now gets its information. The sensational and divisive goes viral. The nuanced and informed does not.
This is largely wrought by the social media companies' algorithms, which reward our most base instincts.
This is playing out with just about every claim of voter fraud right now.
I lay this out here, with other examples, such as the claim that dead people are voting in Michigan. (Evidence indicates what people are pointing to are actually clerical errors.)
NEW: Conservative Twitter exploded yesterday with claims of proof that dead people voted in Michigan.
We looked into it. The evidence indicates that this was not fraud, but rather something much less salacious: Run-of-the-mill clerical errors. nytimes.com/2020/11/06/tec…
It began Wednesday night with tweets from @fleccas, an Ivy League offensive lineman turned right-wing internet journalist.
He had indeed found some bizarre voter files on the state of Michigan website. It appeared people born between 1900 and 1902 had sent in absentee ballots.
By Thursday morning, his posts were the talk of the Republican internet. Candace Owens, James Woods, Jack Posobiec were all sharing them, reaching millions of people. The Gateway Pundit put up a story. This was clear proof of election fraud, many said.
President Trump just tweeted again about claims of "secretly dumped ballots" for Biden in Michigan.
This is false.
These claims are based on screenshots of a mistaken unofficial tally on one site's election map that was caused by a typo that was corrected in about 30 minutes.
I know this because I just spent all day reporting it out.
I spoke to the election official in Shiawassee County who made the mistake; the election-data provider that reported it; and even the Republican consultant who tweeted the images that went viral. nytimes.com/live/2020/2020…
Here is that Republican consultant, @MattMackowiak, owning up to the fact that his screenshots did NOT show election fraud but rather an honest mistake that was quickly corrected.
“I certainly wasn’t intending to make a typo appear fraudulent,” he said.
New data shows that YouTube has cut its recommendations of fringe channels, helping reduce its spread of disinformation.
The changes have also had a knock-on effect: Fox News is now YouTube's most recommended channel alongside election-related videos. nytimes.com/2020/11/03/tec…
In several recent analyses by @gchaslot & @MarcFaddoul of recommendations on popular news videos, YouTube consistently steered people toward Fox News more than any other channel, sometimes by a wide margin.
Fox News also far outperforms other news outlets on Facebook.
Here are the top Facebook pages ranked by their share of total interactions with posts that mentioned the election, Biden or Trump over the past week. (Interactions are the only such data FB makes available.)
NEW: A network of 1,300 websites targeting small towns and cities across the U.S. is built not on traditional journalism, but rather propaganda ordered up by Republican groups and P.R. firms.
The Sioux City Times, Muskegon Sun and Pine State News might look like ordinary local-news outlets, but behind the scenes, many stories are directed by political groups & P.R. firms to promote Republican candidates & companies, or smear their rivals. pinestatenews.com
Here's an example from the hotly contested Senate race in Maine.
The U.S. GDP collapsed and the four Big Tech companies reported blowout earnings.
It's rare that the story tells itself this well.
Amazon sales were up 40% and its profit doubled (!) to $5.2 billion, blowing away Wall Street expectations in a way that makes you wonder whether Wall Street knows what it's talking about.