Some people are wondering why Trump underperformed with white voters, including white working class men. One explanation is that the focus on pandering over economic populism pushed them away. amgreatness.com/2020/10/02/pan…
Two camps: people who realize Trumpism was corrupted from about 2017 onward, with a brief but high profile reversal in mid 2020, and the those who will embrace Trumpism 2.0 (mixture of Goldman Sachs, Kushner, Koch policies). At some point, they'll have to hash this out.
Here are some examples of Trumpism 2.0: Ja'Ron Smith, one of the leading proponents of criminal justice reform, got what he wanted and is jumping ship
Gary Cohn: architect of the tax cuts plan. Before serving in the White House, he was president and COO of Goldman Sachs for 25 years. Cohn got what he wanted, jumped ship
So fraud is real. It happened. But it's also true that the admin lost sight of the mandate. These things are not mutually exclusive.
If you're saying "none of this matters now because of fraud," you're probably also saying, "the admin did nothing wrong and therefore gary cohn, jaron smith and jared kushner did nothing wrong." So Trump pulls off a reversal.. then we repeat these mistakes again?
I don't want to live under Biden-Harris. But I also don't want to go through all this time and effort to just have Trumpism become a TPUSA meme
When people warned about this stuff before midterms, it was called improper because midterms were coming. Then they came, and it became improper in 2019 to make these criticisms, because election was a year away. It's never time to reflect on what we are doing wrong..
Here's another example: are you angry about big tech censorship? Then consider Derek Lyons, who kissed the boot of tech companies from within the WH and is part of the reason Twitter and FB are able to censor us now. Again... fraud is real but so is Derek Lyons
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The project some of us need to undertake right now is hammering nationalist populism free of the dross, defending it from internal distortions and from people who want to return to "business conservatism" and the neoliberal orthodoxy. "Who are we?" is the question we must ask
There are enough people writing and talking about the election. I think more of us need to examine this "movement" and consider some of its contradictions
Too many of the people writing about populism or the realignment, I think, are just hoping that now the GOP can't so easily be called racist because more nonwhites joined the coalition. In other words, they aren't serious
1. I heard this from America First people in the admin today, with the additional note that Ivanka also asked Trump to concede. She wants to run in 2024. AF people are livid.
2. This should not demoralize people. It should make them demand a better team.
Here is the problem: Accepting this is true might seem like a black pill, I don't think it is, but some people do. However... how are you supposed to reverse the course of this election when Trump's kids, senior advisors, are asking him to concede? This is a contradiction.
So you have really smart, really good people fighting for the cause because they believe in the mandate, and Javanka, on the other hand, looking for a way out.
Millions of people now see the Republican Party as the party of the working class, whether they are blue or white collar: Middle America is putting itself in the GOP's camp. This is the only social force capable of pushing back on intersectionalism 1/
So we need to push the GOP to become a true labor party. No more corporate bootlicking, no more siding with big business, no more carrying water for tech companies and the immigration lobby 2/
No more attacking Social Security, and time to take seriously health care 3/
A good mainstream take on why a decent number of black and Latino men support Trump: he projects strength and we respect strength like non-college whites do, and unlike effete whites à la David French 1/ nbcnews.com/think/amp/ncna…
Imagine if Trump would, for once, publicly acknowledge how much Democrats and the left in general hate white people. I think it would rally whites, but also attract some nonwhites, probably mostly men, because of the cojones involved in the act -- strength respects strength 1/
It would highlight 1) how the yet largely white--not all white, of course, but mostly white--middle is crushed from above (Biden, Bezos, Bloomberg) and below (subsidized unproductive criminal class a la BLM) 2/
2) Take us one step closer toward a nationalism capable of unifying enough of the right people against the exploitative ruling class 3/