Thread by @gabrielmalor

Such a stark disconnect between the lawsuits the Trump campaign has filed and the absolutely wild fraud claims being passed around the Trumposphere.

At some point, you'd think they'd wonder why the Trump campaign isn't suing under the "a computer did it!" theory.

So far none of the Trump campaign lawsuits would lead to Trump taking the electoral vote lead.

And the only two claims that could even come close to changing the EV are the supposed "a computer did it" and "we saw Democrats drive up with new ballots" theories.

Nobody has sued under those theories, and I know why and you know why. But what do they think the excuse is?

The reason is these theories are utterly lacking in evidence.

But lots of Trump chatterers seem to actually believe these things are real. So what's the excuse they believe for why Trump isn't suing on either basis?

It doesn't make sense. If you truly believed that a computer has changed votes in states all across the country, aren't you headed to court immediately?

Even an individual voter could seek to vindicate their own vote under this theory, if they believed the computer changed it.

I have to concede that this is true. PACER would definitely ally itself with an evil AI. That's PACER's nature.

https://twitter.com/L_T_G_/status/1325917295827447809

(This is lawyer humor. Aren't we fun?)

Lawgeeks, check out the new Trump campaign lawsuit seeking to prevent Pennsylvania from certifying the vote. (Still nothing about the computer or the claim that Dems drove up with new ballots after election day.)

Here: cdn.donaldjtrump.com/public-files/p…

Among the other remedies the Trump campaign is asking for, they want the federal court to order Pennsylvania not to count valid votes that were cured before Election Day on the theory that it is unfair to voters who did not get a chance to cure their ballots.