Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, one of the biggest Trump boosters in Texas, says he'll pay up $1 million to encourage and reward those who report voter fraud. If info leads to arrest/ conviction for voter fraud. expect at least $25,000, he says.
Perhaps wisely, given the trolling and ridicule that has greeted other GOP 1-800 numbers and reporting sites, Patrick says tipsters should turn over their evidence to local law enforcement.
“I support President Trump’s efforts to identify voter fraud in the presidential election," Patrick says.
Patrick said Texas counted a lot of mail-in votes fast, ignoring a state law that let counties process the ballots (verify signatures, flatten ballots for scanners, etc) early -- something other states don't allow, sometimes because GOP lawmakers opposed it.
Patrick didn't say where the money would come from (tho given the caveat that a tipster needs an arrest AND final conviction, could take a while).
His campaign fund had a healthy $15.5 million at the end of June.
Since it's political, maybe qualifies as campaign expense.
Patrick's payment offer comes after judges nationwide have rejected Trump and GOP lawsuits for lack of evidence of voter fraud.
Just to put a period on this: Money would come from campaign funds, Patrick's campaign says.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BREAKING: Texas Supreme Court DENIES petition seeking to toss out almost 127,000 Harris County votes cast in drive-thru lanes.
Denial is without comment.
There is still, however, am emergency hearing Monday morning before US District Judge Andrew Hanen on a similar challenge, this time federal, by the same 3 GOP candidates and GOP activist to toss out the votes in the emerging Democratic stronghold of Harris County.
Texas Supreme Court asks Harris County to respond, by 4 p.m. today, to a challenge by GOP candidates/activist/House member that seeks to void tens of thousands of Harris County drive-thru votes.
Background: statesman.com/news/20201028/…
There is no way of knowing how many justices really want this info.
It only takes 1 justice to request a response.
And Justice Devine has previously written a dissent to the dismissal of earlier challenges to Harris County's drive-thru voting sites. Nobody joined the dissent.
Been giving this some thought.
It would take a monumental leap of logic (illogic?) for the Texas Supreme Court to invalidate over 117,000 votes cast in drive-thru polling places in Harris County.
In new petition, GOP candidates and state Rep. Toth ask Texas Supreme Court to REJECT Harris County votes cast in drive-thru lanes (100,000+ so far), calling it illegal curbside voting reserved for sick/disabled.
A new argument after earlier bid to end drive-thru voting failed.
Hotze is a GOP activist in Houston
Champion is a GOP candidate for Congress.
Hemphill is a GOP candidate for District Court.
Toth is GOP member of Texas House from The Woodlands.
This comes after the Texas Supreme Court rejected efforts to shut down drive-thru voting last week by the Republican Party of Texas and a separate petition by Hotze, the Harris County GOP and and Hemphill.
US judge in San Antonio REQUIRES all voters, poll workers, and poll watchers in Texas to wear a mask at voting locations. Judge, a Trump appointee, VOIDS portion of Gov. Abbott’s mask mandate that exempted polling places.
More to come.
Judge says exempting those who are “voting, assisting a voter, serving as a poll watcher, or actively administering an election” from compliance with the statewide mask mandate violates the Voting Rights Act "because it creates a discriminatory burden on Black and Latino voters."
Judge initially dismissed the original lawsuit, which sought a long list of poll safety improvements.
5th Circuit Court upheld that ruling but returned case for 1 issue: whether the mask exemption violated the Voting Rights Act.
It does, Judge Jason Pulliam says.
BREAKING: Texas Supreme Court UPHOLDS Gov. Abbott's order limiting counties to 1 mail ballot drop-off site, DISSOLVES temporary restraining order that blocked Abbott's Oct. 1 order that closed extra sites.
BREAKING: 5th Circuit Court STAYS trial judge ruling that required improved pandemic response in the state's geriatric prison, including frequent cleaning of common areas, giving COVID-19 information and providing hand sanitizer, masks, tissues and other hard to get items.
Appeals court says 2 plaintiff-inmates failed to exhaust their administrative remedies.
In addition, "their constitutional claim fails on the merits. TDCJ’s response, albeit imperfect, did not amount to
deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment."
Ruling: "To be sure, the district court identified lapses in TDCJ’s response to COVID-19. As a matter of policy, TDCJ could have done more to protect vulnerable inmates in the Pack Unit. But federal judges are not policymakers."