The Joe Biden transition teams are... not bad.
It's a mixed bag. There are some really bad signs. For example, the Commerce transition team's lead is the general counsel at the University of Pittsburgh, which has been hiring union busting consultants to go after faculty and grad student unions.
Bridget Dooling, on Biden's OMB team, is a straight up Koch brothers plant. She wants more cost/benefit analysis across government, your basic deregulatory operative. citizen.org/article/koch-c…
Yeesh, this is bad. Dooling is, blech. regulatorystudies.columbian.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/…
Department of Justice landing teams are basically all #BigLaw. I've said before that #BigLaw is the Democratic deep state. ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Stoller

Matt Stoller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @matthewstoller

10 Nov
On the way out the door Trump DOJ antitrust chief Makan Delrahim approves the Uber-Postmates deal, because apparently independent restaurants have it too good these days. I guess that's one way to ask for a private equity job. axios.com/doj-clears-ube…
So @makandelrahim will go down as one of the all time biggest dumbasses to run the antitrust division. A lightweight, generally corrupt, but also recused from the Google case, which is the only interesting thing in the division he ostensibly runs. Embarrassing.
Hey Republicans, Trump's antitrust chief is doing the bidding of little big tech. This is embarrassing. Clean house now that you have the chance out of power to do so.
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
1. I'll explain what I mean here. I'm a Biden voter. But it is fundamentally dangerous that Mark Zuckerberg and Sundar Pichai are making policy over how we deliberate over political matters. This policy has to be done through the government. But the problem is even deeper.
2. Voting machines are now consolidated and owned by private equity firms, who make policy over electoral infrastructure itself. Media conglomerates organize the political parties. Contractors structure government spending and Blackrock structures Federal Reserve policy.
3. The essence of democracy is twofold, civic and commercial. We need competitive markets and a democratic system of industrial control. Otherwise monopolists will and do make public policy that we the people would otherwise be making.
Read 12 tweets
6 Nov
In 2017-2018 there was a debate among Dems about what happened, the side saying it was because Trump voters are unredeemable and evil won.

That debate has opened up again.
Trump’s narrow loss despite his massive governance failures show that what happened in 2016 wasn’t really about Hillary Clinton, but a deeper anger and mistrust towards Democrats.
The political problem for Democrats is that the GOP is now plotting to take the entire working class, and Dems kind of want them to take it.
Read 4 tweets
5 Nov
Democratic donors dramatically over-invest in elections and grassroots organizing and under-invest in actually understanding how to use the massive and complicated government they are about to take over.
It's an unpopular hot take but maybe hiring a few people to think about how to use the Commerce Department with its authority to, oh I don't know, restructure the entire economy, is better than handing Amy McGrath another eleventy zillion dollars.
The Federal government is a $5 trillion behemoth. Maybe it's a good idea to know stuff about how to run it.
Read 5 tweets
4 Nov
The problem with Nate Silver's framework has never been the models, but that the whole enterprise of trying to predict elections just to predict elections is fundamentally useless.
Nate Silver uses his models to disguise an elitist pro-Wall Street ideology. Here's his strong pro-bailout rant in Feb 2009 titled "Give Geithner a Break." fivethirtyeight.com/features/give-…
Here's @NateSilver538 during the financial crisis in 2009.

1. "I’m sorry, but somewhere between 99.9% and 99.999999% of us are severely underqualified to be making policy recommendations on this issue." This is neither the time nor the place for mass movements..."
Read 4 tweets
4 Nov
1. Let's get away from left-center debates and get to the two real Dem theories of social justice. (1) neoliberalism, or helping the individual with college education in a global corporate world (2) structuralism, which is downsize corporations so everyone has a bit of capital.
2. Both neoliberalism and structuralism have their cultures. One is very much McKinsey aristocracy philanthropy compliance oriented, the other is chip on your shoulder populist universalism. Think, Pete Buttigieg vs Thomas Frank.
3. The core of neoliberal political culture is to avoid talking about policy at all costs. Politics for neoliberals is only about what happens in elections, and to them there is simply no connection between government and elections. It's all messaging, narrative, left vs center.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!