This is going on - and on, and on - because the interests of R establishment figures and Trump align. Republicans want obstruction. Merrick Garland, but for Joe Biden! No norms, dude. Trump has a variety of financial, legal and pathological incentives. 1/
R's have a new monkey wrench. What if 20% of the country never admits Biden won, because fraud-something-something? Are elected R's going to stick with that? Eh, no - yet it will be brandished symptom of left perfidy. No one trusts the media! No one trusts Washington! 2/
Establishment R's are deliberately killing democracy because they need to wave the poor guy's bloody shirt, as a prop, as a sign of how democracy's murder means R's need special accommodation. 'How can D's expect to govern when the people don't trust the system?' 3/
The fact that 2-% of the country will maintain - until doomsday - that it is totally reasonable to believe Biden stole the election, will be offered, seriously, as a reason why D's need to meet R's half-way even before any negotiations about anything begin. 4/
If 'good Americans' believe X, you have to respect X. You don't have to believe it. But you have to respect belief in X. If Biden doesn't half-admit he wasn't duly elected, it's like he's disrespecting Real America. So that's another reason he's only half-President. Respect! 5/
Observe the pushback against FOX News - FOX News! - for cutting away from lies, from the White House. You aren't allowed to disrespect belief in X, if 'good people' believe it! So you are obliged to feed the falsehood. Anything less would be tearing us apart as a country! 6/
Now, it's hard to separate the fact that I'm a hopping mad partisan from my analysis. Am I pathologizing a difference in opinion, a difference in values? Am I the asshole? 6/
No. Establishment R's know this fraud line is a crock. So they are sticking with this 'well he's got a right to see his valid challenges through' legalistic line. But they also know the point of delay is to cause 20% of the country to have this permanent, false belief. 7/
The R establishment wants their base to be ideologically defined by a core commitment that they themselves - the establishment - know to be flatly, a lie. No question. Not some difference in values. Just: not true. 8/
Admire how the epistemology of testimony and pseudo-proceduralism affords perfect belief laundering. Why will 20% of the country believe Joe Biden won only via massive fraud? Because Tucker Carlson and Newt Gingrich and - he ain't gone! - Donald Trump told them so. 9/
Viewers can tell themselves: if Tucker and Newt say so, I can believe it. Believing because a trusted authority figure says so is having a reason. Of course Tucker and Newt don't believe it, and - if you listen - don't claim to. But they say things to let others believe. 10/
So the belief gets leveraged up on the strength of ... nothing. 'Trump wouldn't have been able to drag legal challenges out that long if there were no fraud.' But also: 'the legal challenges are a pure formality and he's going to leave office on schedule.' 11/
It's like some pre-2008 financial crisis collateralized debt obligation (cdo) but epistemologized. You have beliefs that are allegedly backed by some asset - 'real Americans', or an important guy like Tucker. It can't be junk! It's got to be worth something. 12/
But it's absolute junk. It's not worth anything. The trick is to keep it moving, as-if worth - oh, 20 cents on the dollar, when it's really worth zero cents on the dollar. That's the GOP, and that's why Trump is the perfect Republican. 13/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What is actually going on in this little playlet? 'Concern about voter fraud among Democrats', as a response to Biden's acceptance, is ... a lie. 1/
And a disrespectful one. In the abstract, sure, somebody's job has to be worrying about voter fraud. But since everyone who has studied it certifies it cannot be - hence isn't - perpetrated at scale, all allegations to the contrary are, ahem, incredible lies. 2/
Now: suppose people on the other side - the leftists - are not willing to live by lies? As seems not unlikely. It's not clear what the punishment should be for living by lies, out loud, in the workplace, like this guy. Maybe everyone else should just roll their eyes. 3/
The dynamic is this: Trump, for reasons financial, legal and personally pathological, is doing his best to trash the room - our constitutional order - before checking out 1 minute before noon on the day, while stealing all the bathrobes and small soaps. 1/
It is notable that the R establishment is, largely, letting him do it. Why? 1) they are afraid of him, since they are afraid of his base. 2) they want the joint trashed but would prefer not to do it so obviously themselves. Reason: they want the country to be ungovernable. 2/
Why? Because they have no plan to govern the country. The R's are a cartel for securing R power, which leaves no time out for distractions like governing. So they don't want to look bad compared to a party - the D's - that aspires to govern. The R's want it totally wrecked. 3/
Kaufmann does deserve praise; it would hardly have been possible for anyone to manage such a strange delivery of Nietzsche into a hostile, English world without distortions, quirks, odd decisions - never mind counterweight corrective political apologetics. 1/
My personal Kaufmann story is taking the "Portable Nietzsche" on a college trip. It was the only thing I had to read for a few days. It seemed thick enough to hold me, when I set out. But then I realized 1) it was 2/3's "Zarathustra"; 2) I didn't like "Zarathustra". 2/
I loved "The Gay Science", "Genealogy" and (although I had more trouble with this one) "Beyond Good and Evil". Z. seemed nuts. Bad. Ponderous. Pretentious. Not clever. Lacking in ironic self-awareness. WTF. 3/
Here we see the next 4 years in microcosm. If the R's were a normal, center-right party, it might cost them in the eyes of voters to be seen doing this stuff. And it may cost them in GA, if they look too crazy the next few weeks. It may lose them votes, maybe even the Senate. 1/
But for Mitch, it's a no-brainer tactical call in light of long term strategy. Tactically, 'do the wrong thing, though you may alienate moderates and 'do the right thing'-curious R's' is obviously right, strategically. 2/
Because, long term, you have no aspiration to be a normal, governing party. You are a counter-majoritarian cartel for getting R's elected, and holding power. It's permanent minority rule or ruin. 3/
I think Joni Mitchell is the single most underappreciated figure in folk/rock history. I made a joke about this once, posting something like 'hey, you know who was actually pretty good - Joni Mitchell!' And I got dogpiled by folks who failed to detect, you know, complex irony.
I got lectured all 'Joni Mitchell is a genius and everyone who isn't an idiot knows it!' which is 110% true. As was my due. But it's true. Her solid enough reputation is tiny beside this incredible back catalogue of stupefyingly original works of unearthly beauty.
One third of the tracks on any of the better albums are sui generis. At least utterly unlike anyone who isn't Joni. (It's true she repeats herself, even at her most original. But she is, presumably, biologically human.)
"You know what? Nobody fears pro-Trump riots." Nobody sane fears Biden is going to try to steal the election. Everyone knows if Biden wins, unless by landslide, Trump is going to try to steal the election. Weird to blame the left for effects of that. theamericanconservative.com/dreher/riots-e…
Everyone knows that, if Trump squeaks out an EC victory, threading the needle, the result will not be a gracious, humbled Trump, keenly aware he lost the popular vote by millions and therefore he has a civic duty of office to reach across the aisle, find accommodation.
If Trump wins most Americans will be mad because they will know that, though the result is formally legitimate (but how can one be sure, knowing Trump's willingness to cheat?) it lacks substantive, democratic legitimacy. Most Americans will know they are unrepresented.