John Hayward Profile picture
11 Nov, 24 tweets, 5 min read
Leaving aside the question of how many might be fraudulent - there's no way ALL of them are - the number of Biden-only ballots combined with huge GOP success downballot makes it pretty clear this election was a thumbs-down referendum on Trump, just as the Democrats wanted.
There's no other way to interpret such a clear signal from voters, and it's not terribly surprising. The coronavirus was a crisis that could take down even the strongest incumbent. It's remarkable Trump did as well as he did - another signal that should not be overlooked.
Mail-in balloting made it incredibly easy for people to take out their anger against the incumbent by filling in a bubble and dropping an envelope in the mail. They were coached and harvested to do so. The outcome is only surprising in that Trump came as close as he did.
We're probably stuck with this mail-in balloting garbage forever now, which means every election will be heavily influenced by whoever can round up enough people who don't give enough of a damn to study issues or comply with normal voting procedures. The GOP had better adapt.
In this particular election, it's not terribly surprising that the apathy vote was easily persuaded to lift one finger to express displeasure with the incumbent and take a gamble on someone else. It was easy for big-city Dem machines to herd them and harvest their votes.
We heard a lot about Trump's great ground game in battleground states and saw the huge rallies, and it all really DID mean something - but meanwhile the Dems were focused on harvesting ballots, not reaching out to persuade engaged voters.
Biden's basement campaign was very effective at keeping the focus solely on Trump, with the help of the press, which effectively BECAME the Biden campaign. They squelched everything that would have taken the focus off Trump, and he didn't exactly object to being the focus.
Trump happily stayed in the spotlight even as it turned into a crosshair. His combative style helped Dems make the election all about him. He missed some chances to make the Return to Normal appeal, and while he did better in the homestretch, it was probably too late by then.
Throughout his term, Trump picked a lot of fights that didn't have any great payoff for him. The media gleefully helped create an image of constant chaos around him. That makes it hard to run as the Return to Normal candidate after a massive and emotional crisis.
An election that becomes an up-or-down referendum on a combative incumbent after a once-in-a-century crisis that upends every corner of national life, with the opponent allowed to hide from tough questions throughout? That's about the worst position you could be in.
And yet, Trump very nearly won. He probably would have, in any scenario without the coronavirus, and that largely sank him because of the way he TALKED about it. People were telling pollsters they were better off after Trump and gave him solid approval for everything else.
The voters REWARDED Trump's party handsomely, rather than voting against them. The apathetic voters harvested by Dems with mail-in ballots couldn't care less about Congress. However the investigation of fraud shakes out, it's absolutely amazing Trump came as close as he did.
And Trump fought that campaign to the final bell after years of sustained attack from every quarter of the political system, from the media to the permanent bureaucracy. Dems spared no effort to attack him, wasted millions of dollars and America's time on constant theater.
Dems held coronavirus relief hostage and got their media to blame Trump and the GOP caucus for it. Every quarter of popular culture waged total war against Trump for years on end. Members of his own party, even his own administration, turned against him.
Trump never stopped shooting from the hip, even when he was talking to people like Bob Woodward. He couldn't get out of his own way during the worst crisis to hit America in generations. But he almost won in spite of all that, and his party flourished in this huge election.
There will be tons of post-election analysis of Trump's mistakes, but there should be even deeper analysis of what he did well. How did this brash, undisciplined outsider get within such a close margin of winning after the worst turn of fortune imaginable for an incumbent?
There is more to learn from Trump's successes. It's a much deeper subject to dive into. His campaign errors, and the tactics used against him by the Dems, are fairly obvious. The means by which he rallied such incredible support during the worst of times should be studied hard.
This would be true even if the fondest dreams of Trump's ardent supporters come true and the election is overturned due to vote fraud. The battle for truth, justice, and the American way is never-ending. There's ALWAYS another election. You have to keep improving your game.
Any coach will tell you there's no way to improve your game without studying your plays and turning a critical eye to everything both teams did. That's even true when you scored the most touchdowns in history... but the other team eked out a 1-point win with a dubious ref call.
Emotions are running high and nobody wants to think about this stuff right now, but it's important to take stock while the impressions are still fresh, before months of spin wars have been fought, and the "next election" is pretty darn close in Georgia.
I guess it's heresy for some to discuss any of this while all the vote fraud investigations are pending. If that's how you feel, then you probably didn't make it past the first tweet and you're not reading this - but if you are, I respect your feelings. Let me just say this:
I'd be asking the same questions if Trump was narrowly in the official lead right now, and I'd be asking them on Monday if the election were overturned on Friday and people were led away in cuffs for vote fraud. Any way you slice it, it's still a fascinating outcome.
Passion is vitally important, but so is reflection. You want to be an effective warrior for what you believe in - that's why so many turned away from bloodless establishment Republican candidates to Trump. A good warrior is fierce in battle, calm when studying the battlefield.
I don't see any point in being unrealistic about what has occurred, in either direction. I'd prefer to let Democrats make that mistake from deep inside their media bubble. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

12 Nov
I remember warning at the outset that on a long enough timeline, every crisis becomes a religion. The Church of Covid is fully up and running, complete with heaven-and-hell mythology, devotional practices, and papal indulgences for elites and events with the correct politics.
Beneath all the politics and myth-making lies the simple idea that masks probably help a little, and if they help a little - plus giving people a little psychological comfort in a time of great crisis - they're worth using. If it ended there, we'd be having a rational discussion.
But masks were politicized in the worst possible way, and reason went out the window as a political-religious movement formed around the Wuhan coronavirus. It's easy to see why people fell for it. They desperately wanted to believe they could do SOMETHING to gain control.
Read 16 tweets
11 Nov
Al Gore conceded on Dec 13, 2000. The media treated him as a hero, a great statesman doing one last service for the country he loved so much by gracefully accepting that his challenges would not succeed.

Golly gee, I wonder if they'd give Trump the same coverage on Dec 13 2020.
You young'uns who weren't around for 2000 are probably getting a hilariously cooked and slanted media perspective on what actually happened. Gore, his lawyers, his party, and DNC Media fought bitterly to steal Florida. It was scorched earth.
The media was doing emergency crisis news shows, interviewing people who tearfully swore they meant to vote for Gore, pinky swear, but their poor little heads were twisted all around by those confusing (Democrat-designed) ballots. They were treated like martyrs by the media.
Read 11 tweets
10 Nov
Every modern effort to crush free speech begins as a crusade against "disinformation." China's massive Internet censorship apparatus was initially justified as an effort to control the spread of false information, and the Chinese state still describes it that way.
Censors begin by claiming that they only want to control the spread of deliberate falsehoods and push back against propaganda campaigns. They always begin by saying their primary concern is disinformation spread by hostile foreign powers. China constantly says that to this day.
The definition of "disinformation" begins to expand as the censors seek more power. Soon they aren't just going after DELIBERATE falsehoods pushed by malevolent conspiracies - they're suppressing everything from honest mistakes to predictions and "wrong" opinions.
Read 17 tweets
10 Nov
The double standard for coronavirus restrictions - dancing in the streets for Biden is fine but you can't have a funeral for your mom, the elite can get haircuts and attend speeches - is an important expression of the totalitarian ideal that even strict rules are not universal.
Universally-applied rules are a severe impediment to centralized power. The elite CANNOT be made to live under the rules they force the rest of us to follow. If they were, they would be less eager to write elaborate rules. Exemptions and favors are key elements of REAL power.
It's important for the general public to accept and internalize the idea that the elites are special and "deserve" exemptions from the rules - even the rules that are supposedly matters of life and death. The elites are too important and virtuous to follow the rules they write.
Read 10 tweets
6 Nov
Questioning suspicious numbers is appropriate and necessary, but also keep in mind that between mail-in balloting, the coronavirus, and Trump's unique style, it's not unbelievable to see a lot of ticket-splitting, or ballots that checked off Biden for president and nothing else.
For starters, mail-in ballot was a perfect weapon against Trump, even without any shenanigans. It looped in a huge number of people who wouldn't have bothered to vote otherwise, people with no strong opinion or position other than disliking Donald Trump.
The marginal effect of mail-in balloting could easily have been huge, given the coronavirus and its effect on everything else. It obliterated everything else that might have made indifferent voters think the incumbent did a decent enough job on bread-and-butter issues.
Read 15 tweets
5 Nov
Suppose Trump pulls out the win after these days of agonizing drama. Would Democrat voters - not political operatives, just regular folks who vote Dem - be willing to join hands with Republicans and insist on voter ID rules that prevent this from ever happening again?
It shouldn't matter who ultimately wins in 2020 - it sure as heck doesn't matter to me - but it seems like Repub voters are pretty disgusted with our Third World voting system no matter what, and Dems will be hopping mad if Trump ends up winning. Perhaps a bipartisan opening!
We could come together across party lines and resolve that we will never go through anything like this again. And if partisan elected officials arrogantly refuse to heed that bipartisan demand - well, it would tell us a lot about them, wouldn't it?
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!