Exclusive: Croydon Council issues Section 114 notice - effectively the equivalent of bankruptcy - with immediate effect
It's the first local authority to do so since Northamptonshire County Council in 2018
A notice informing councillors was sent out minutes ago by Lisa Taylor, the council's director of finance, investment and risk - and the authority's Section 151 officer
The immediate cause is the financial impact of Covid-19 but, as I explained in the thread below a few weeks ago, the council's financial problems are far more ingrained than that
A Section 114 notice means the council's key finance officer believes the authority cannot meet its legal obligation to set a balanced budget. It has serious implications.
For next 21 days the council must not spend any money without authorisation of the chief finance officer
The council obviously has many vital statutory obligations it must meet - not least of which is to vulnerable children and adults. This urgent spending will continue (but still require sign off)
This decision is a major embarrassment for three senior Labour politicians:
@SadiqKhan will come under fire for failure of a Labour council in London @SteveReedMP, the shadow sec responsible for councils, is Croydon North MP @LabourSJ, also on shadow cab, is Croydon Central MP
All three will inevitably face questions about what they knew about the severity of Croydon's financial problems
At the start of the pandemic, CIPFA (which oversees rules around council finances) and MHCLG agreed to change Section 114 guidance to allow councils to seek financial assistance from government in attempt to avoid such drastic action.
So Croydon effectively asked for a bailout
However, despite ongoing talks between the council and @mhclg, Director of finance Lisa Taylor decided that, with forecast spending continuing to "significantly exceed resources" and plans to rectify this were "insufficient", she had no choice but to issue the 114 notice
Taylor says part of the reason why this suddenly changed is a letter the council received from @CIPFA chief exec @RobWhiteman, who pointed out the new guidance related to "direct costs" connected to Covid-19.
Croydon issues were far from limited to the pandemic
Not only was the council's £65m budget gap growing, but it turns out that £17.7m of the savings presented to cabinet on September 21 had been incorrectly identified as new savings - so the plans would not plug the deficit by anywhere near as much as hoped
Perhaps even more worryingly, a review of the council's housing company Brick by Brick, which the authority had loaned huge sums of money to yet received nothing in return, "identified that there is a greater risk than previously
anticipated"
Despite all the warning signs, and the damning report by Grant Thornton, Taylor told councillors: "I am still not seeing an organisation that is taking the necessary radical decisions to stop all but essential expenditure"
Taylor: "I am not seeing the necessary level of pace, urgency or radical options to be presented to members to take decisions upon to give me confidence that the Council can
make the level of savings required to deliver a balance budget in year"
There must now be a meeting of the full council to consider the Section 114 notice within the next 21 days.
The council is already due to discuss the Grant Thornton report next week
To reiterate:
Croydon Council has banned all but essential spending in order to urgently cut its costs.
A council serving around 400,000 people has effectively declared bankruptcy.
A seriously angry Labour councillor tells me
Obviously a lot of things have happened to get to this point. Covid obviously a factor, but certainly not the only one. Clear councillors/officers failed to act on warning signs since 2017.
Then there's the wider issue about 10 years of austerity pushing councils to the brink
A reminder that:
- Council leader @CllrTony stepped down last month (he is still a councillor)
- Finance lead @CllrSimonHall also stepped down in Oct (he is still a councillor)
- Chief executive Jo Negrini left in August
Cllr @HamidaAli76 has since become council leader. But sources within the local party are concerned she is too close to Newman to undertake the full inquiry they believe is needed, and has yet to explain what she did to scrutinise decisions as a cabinet member
Following up on that Brick by Brick point earlier. It looks like the total risk to the council *this year* from the botched business arrangement could be as much as £17 million!
Utterly scandalous
The full scale of the problem is this - six months into the financial year the council, despite all its cost-cutting plans, still has to find £37 million from somewhere in order to balance its books
Should point out that @InsideCroydon has done some relentless reporting on all the issues building up to this financial crisis. Well worth a read google.co.uk/amp/s/insidecr…
Jason Perry, leader of the Conservative group in Croydon, tells me former council leader Tony Newman and finance lead Simon Hall to resign as councillors.
"Billions of pounds of taxpayers' money is at stake - to just step down and go to the bank benches really isn't good enough"
Croydon Council has issued a statement announcing the 114 notice "due to the severe ongoing financial challenges"
Council leader Hamida Ali: "There will be difficult decisions ahead but I want to reassure local people that the council will still be here to support you"
I understand the Labour cllrs are about to hold an emergency meeting. Most learned about the notice when the email from Lisa Taylor was sent out just after 3pm.
Let's just say feeling that former leader and finance lead to should resign as councillors not limited to Tories
Now probably a good time to remind everyone @BureauLocal is holding an online discussion about the culture of secrecy surrounding local decision making next Thursday between 1-2pm. Sign up here crowdcast.io/e/what-goes-on…
Plenty of Croydon residents asking how they will be affected by this. A section 114 bans all non-essential spending, but there are things councils legally still have to do. Here's a decent explainer by the Beeb from 2018 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-451291…
.@mhclg has issued a statement in which it accuses Croydon Council of being "entirely irresponsible with their spending and investments".
A "rapid non-statutory review" of the council, announced after Grant Thornton's public interest report, is due to conclude later this month
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Surprise surprise - I'm still waiting for @thurrockcouncil to explain why it borrowed £125m of public money last month (or to even acknowledge my Qs). I'm told opposition leader asked but has also been given no response.
This is not how a local authority should conduct itself
I've reported on local authorities for 12 years so no stranger to how they deal with the press. I've been told 'it's not a story', shouted and sworn at, pulled in for meetings, received complaints to editors and even the PCC.
I've never been repeatedly ignored, until now
Even those councils who thought I was a pain in the backside or paid only lip service to transparency and accountability, never just ignored me when given the chance to explain or respond to something.
At the very least they realised it was just bad PR
THREAD: Auditor Grant Thornton has issued a rare 'public interest report' into the crisis at Croydon Council.
It's an indictment of serious financial mismanagement, and a microcosm of the risks, highlighted by @TBIJ's work, taken by an increasing no. of local authorities
For those not aware, Croydon Council is on the verge of financial collapse. It faces a budget gap of £65m, far in excess of its reserves. As such it was hopelessly ill-prepared for Covid-19 and the council has, in effect, sought a bailout from @mhclg
Grant Thornton first raised the alarm about the council's financial position (specifically the rate at which it was burning through reserves) in 17/18. It did so again, in worsening terms, in 18/19 and 19/20.
These warnings were effectively ignored, the report says.
REVEALED: A council in Essex borrowed £1 BILLION from local authorities across the UK - then invested most of the cash in money-making ventures. Now it refuses to say who it borrowed from and what it invested in thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2020-0…
In the starkest example yet of the commercialisation of local government, a nine-month investigation by @TBIJ & @FT found Thurrock Council borrowed from more than 150 local authorities across the UK - then invested £702 million in attempt to become self-sufficient
Thurrock invested most of the money in the solar industry, including up to £420 million in a single company, that then used the cash to buy more than 50 solar farms across the UK. But there are questions about the business model and the risk to public money
My 4-year-old nearly caused national food shortage this morning. Got hold of mum's phone while she slept and ordered 990 mini Peperamis, and a combined 1,200 bakewell tarts and Fab ice lollies from Tesco. Total order £451.27. Even booked a delivery slot
When asked for comment, he said: "I wanted to have more food than everyone else"
Stopped using Twitter but thought I'd reassure everyone a national crisis had been averted
Big news for local councils yesterday as the Treasury unexpectedly increased the Public Works Loan Board (PWLB) interest rate by a full percentage point. Doesn't sound like a big deal? Think again
The PWLB is the main source of local authority borrowing. Its low interest loans help councils finance the construction and maintenance of things like schools and roads. Such a significant increase to the rate of borrowing will have a huge impact on the sector
In a letter to chief finance officers at councils across the country, the Treasury said the decision came after "some local authorities have substantially increased their use of the PWLB in recent months". But if they're building schools and fixing roads, so what? Well...
Marc Marshall, the defendant who died yesterday after dousing himself in acid in court, was Mark Hill-Wood, a fraudster I investigated for the best part of a year back in 2015/16 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
Marshall, or Mark Roger Castley as he was known, was one of the UK's most prolific fraudsters, a conman who had spent the best part of 30 years tricking people out of their money. His first conviction was in 1991
He was jailed multiple times. In 2004 for making hundreds of thousands of pounds through a scam involving bogus surveillance equipment and in 2008 for conning people in Stevenage into funding his wedding and helicopter trips to Ascot