Here's the Biden-Harris climate plan, with my thoughts in the thread below: buildbackbetter.com/priorities/cli…
First, there's lots to like: Paris commitment; zero-carbon public transportation in all cities; sustainable housing; retrofit buildings; union jobs; renewable energy; transition to EVs; environmental justice (although this is *extremely* vague). But there are also big problems:
1. Why does this plan need to be framed in the language of "growth"? The US economy does not need more GDP. And in any case, "sustainable growth" is not a thing.
2. The US economy needs to be decarbonized by 2030, not 2050 (particularly given the USA's outsized responsibility for excess historical emissions). This can be feasibly accomplished by scaling down industrial energy use in order to enable a faster transition to renewables.
3. EVs are great, but only if we also reduce aggregate private car use. The Biden-Harris plan sounds like it wants to *expand* the auto industry rather than scale it down.
4. The call for "climate-smart agriculture" tends to be code for agribusiness solutions like heat-resistant GMOs and intensification. What we need is regenerative, agroecological farming methods to restore soils and biodiversity. (And an end to industrial beef production).
5. Where is the public job guarantee? Where is the plan for ecological regeneration? Where is the commitment to reduce the USA's resource use? Where is the commitment to ecological standards on imports?
6. But the worst part is that this plan doesn't actually mention the need to end fossil fuels. That is unacceptable. Biden-Harris have a long way to go, and this won't happen unless we push them. Join and/or donate to @sunrisemvmt and @DemSocialists to support the movement.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Hickel

Jason Hickel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jasonhickel

3 Nov
The UN has published a new report on "Harmony with Nature", which outlines the remarkable steps that some countries and cities have been taking away from growth-based economics. It's an inspiring list, starting on page 4. undocs.org/en/A/75/266
The report also mentions degrowth, postgrowth and @KateRaworth's doughnut economics. Plus an interesting fact I didn't know: "The origin of the term degrowth, found in décroissance in French, refers to a river going back to its normal flow after a disastrous flood."
Section 5 documents recent gains in Earth jurisprudence. "A first step to recognizing the rights of Nature is the recognition that non-human beings are sentient, not mere property, and must be afforded respect and legal recognition."
Read 4 tweets
2 Nov
"We cannot reverse ecological breakdown while at the same time pursuing growth; but we *can* reverse ecological breakdown while at the same time ensuring flourishing lives for all. That’s the story we need to be telling. That is where hope lies." jasonhickel.org/blog/2020/10/1…
"We need a Green New Deal, yes. But if we want our GND to be technologically feasible, ecologically coherent, and socially just, it needs to be a GND without growth. It needs to be a GND that actively scales down excess resource and energy use, in a safe, just and equitable way."
"Progressives have been pulled into a debate about whether a GND will be good or bad for growth. This is exactly the wrong question to ask. The real question is: do we need growth in the first place? And the answer to that is no."
Read 5 tweets
30 Oct
This is surely one of the most important climate facts we've learned this year: high-income countries use a staggering 20x more energy than is actually required to ensure flourishing lives for all.
Put another way, high-income countries could reduce their energy use by *95%* while still providing good living standards for everyone. Source: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
What's so powerful - and hopeful - about this fact is that high-income countries generate on average 10% of their final energy from renewables. In other words, we already have sufficient renewable capacity for a flourishing clean energy economy...
Read 4 tweets
29 Oct
The IPCC is clear that if we want to stay under 1.5C, without relying on speculative negative emissions technologies, we need to reduce global energy use by 40%. For some reason this is not yet part of the public discussion about climate change, and it needs to be.
If you are a climate journalist, this is a story worth writing about.
Such dramatic reductions in energy use require scaling down unnecessary industrial production. The good news is that we can do this while at the same time ensuring good lives for all: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 4 tweets
23 Oct
This is one of the most important climate facts of our time:

if we cut excess energy use (i.e., by scaling down unnecessary industrial production), we can accomplish a *much* faster transition to renewables—in a matter of years, not decades.
Here we review empirical literature indicating that reducing excess energy/resource use is necessary to stay under 1.5/2C: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
And this recent paper shows that we can deliver flourishing lives for all, with universal healthcare and education etc, for 10 billion people, with 40% less energy than we presently use. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 6 tweets
23 Oct
These two books will forever change how you think about trees and other more-than-human beings. They're precipitating a quiet revolution in our culture and I can't recommend them enough.
Both are inspired by the pathbreaking work of Dr Suzanne Simard, whose research taught us how trees communicate and interact with one another, even sharing food and medicine among kin and friends through mycelial networks.
Note that Simard herself is always careful to point out that none of this is new. It has long been known and understood by Indigenous Americans. "Western science shut that down for a while and now we’re getting back to it." nautil.us/issue/77/under…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!