Aella Profile picture
12 Nov, 6 tweets, 2 min read
storytime:
when I was a child, my dad was extremely cruel in a lot of ways. I remember trying to empathize with him and being terrified because he didn't seem 'aware' of the pain he was doing, even though the signs were there.
This was terrifying because -
when i imagined being my dad, i realized that it 'felt good', in the sense that there was no sense of being wrong. He felt like a victim, persecuted and hurt by others - and this was *exactly how I felt*. I felt like he was hurting me, and like he shouldn't be.
2/
So from an early age I struggled a lot with the paranoia that I was really cruel and hurting a lot of other people, because I saw that cruel people *felt as correct as I did*. A lot of my attention went to trying to figure out how I could tell - from the inside, how do you know 3
if you're being cruel to others?
And I realized that to be different from my dad, I needed to stop using "you hurt me" as a justification to hurt other people back. That no matter the pain someone caused me, I needed to hold their humanity in mind and care for them. 4/
This has deeply informed my entire worldview from a pretty young age, and I think is why I'm so repulsed by a lot of the political discourse happening now. So much of it are righteous justifications of hurting other people due to how they've been hurt. I get the appeal, but 5/
these people are utterly failing to empathize with the people who hurt them - and empathizing with people who hurt you is how you learn what it's like to be a cruel person, and thus how to avoid being that yourself.
6/6

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aella

Aella Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aella_Girl

12 Nov
In my experience, the biggest unspoken and often unseen social motivator is attractiveness.
Consistently, hotter people are treated better, even subtly, and consistently most people around me have either denied or ignored that they're treating/being treated differently.
Hotter people are more confident, because they've been getting this boost from society that's invisible to them. In their world, people just like them more, treat them better, and they don't see how unattractive people don't get the same treatment.
I've seen my male friends swarm an attractive women and describe her personality as glowing, her demeanor as confident and assured, when in my opinion she was not actually cool; they were blinded by her face and they were completely unaware to how blinded they were.
Read 5 tweets
3 Nov
In clubhouse (a voice-only app), I've had the chance to listen to lots of rooms of entirely black people talk, which I rarely get to hear in my daily life.
It turns out black people on clubhouse talk about being black a *lot*. They reference blackness in relation to everything.
It's really fascinating; blackness permeates as an identity in a way I've never heard another ethnicity or nation referenced (but similar to how I've heard Christians talk). It's very tribal, and touches on many aspects of conversation you wouldn't expect to be black-related.
I felt very intensely 'white' when listening to these groups, when usually I don't notice my skin color if I'm in an e.g., asian-dominant group. It felt very clear that I was *not* in their in-group at all; there was a huge cultural divide that feels explicitly upheld.
Read 4 tweets
3 Nov
Women in science need to learn more about how statistics work.
If I published results this low in significance as tho they were real I could have 'proved' eighty different insane things by now.
To explain why this is bad:
Her sample size is low. There's calculations you can do to figure out exactly how meaningful a result (basically, what's the probability it was an "accidental" positive) is based on the sample size and the correlation strength.
It's irresponsible to publish results as significant
if there's too high a probability that your correlation was just random chance. If you test a lot of things for long enough, you're absolutely gonna find lots of correlations that are just random chance!
This means you have to be extra careful if you're checking a ton of these.
Read 4 tweets
2 Nov
I'm going through my newest data set (~3300 answers) and it's absolutely fascinating. I asked about 'who do you know', with stronger weights for knowing someone better.
Some finds so far:
Women on average are more likely to report knowing someone who X
The most masculine gendered answer is that men are more likely to report knowing someone in jail.
Eastern Europe is living up to the reputation of conservative - they're least likely to report knowing people who are trans/poly/sex workers, but also least likely to report knowing ppl who've been raped (shame culture?)
They're most likely to know a pedo.
Read 7 tweets
13 Oct
I don't think Onlyfans is introducing more promiscuity - I think it (and stuff like WAP) are symptoms of changing cultural tides in regards to *seduction*, not actual sex. The difference may be hard to spot but I think it's extremely important.
Thread:
I suspect seduction rites and sex rites are two extremely different classes and should be treated separately. Seduction rites include culturally visible sexual power - from bared ankles to miniskirts - and messaging around that power. Right now we're seeing a huge rise in 1/
female sexual signalling - the scope of what is acceptable female seduction display is widening a lot - look at Onlyfans and WAP. It's very explicit, borderline pornographic, female-empowerment messaging. But I think this is *not* transferring to sex as much as people think! 2/
Read 9 tweets
10 Oct
I'm triggered by people who believe in astrology, or talking to spirits or deities or reading energies or whatever. Am I just overly sensitive or closed minded or judgmental?
Maybe but... I think there's something else going on here.
An analogy:
In circling (or generally good communication), it's a good rule to 'own your experience.' If someone you're talking to says something stupid that makes you angry, recognize your reaction as "fully yours" - don't put it onto the other person as their responsibility 1/
You can take actions like leaving the room, or communicating the anger they're sparking in you, but don't place the burden of the *reaction itself* onto them. It's not theirs, its yours.
This perspective (and habit) comes out of a certain view of the world - that you 2/
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!