I have been a tech entrepreneur since I was in HS (20+ years). Some learnings:

1) There is a LOT of luck.

Definitely lots of hard work and skill required - no doubt. But, let's not downplay luck. Luck in everything. In privilege. In opportunity. In finding PM fit. In health.
2) A friend who has been a successful founder echoed this. His first company was highly successful.

He has been trying all kinds of startup ideas since then and nothing has really clicked.

He's smart. Hardworking. Has money. Great network. But you can force PM fit.
3) It shows up in the numbers as well.

Depending on the study you read, successful serial entrepreneurs have a slight edge over first time founders. But not by much.
4) For tech companies where the biggest risk is getting to PM fit, I'm a firm believer that experience can help you take better guesses at where there may be opportunities. It can also help you test and iterate faster. But there's still a LOT of luck in finding PM fit.
5) As such, I also think entrepreneurs shouldn't think of starting their company as 1 and done.

Being an entrepreneur is a career. Statistically speaking, you need many at bats to make it.

In your life, you probably have 5-10 at-bats if you shut down "bad ideas" quickly.
6) Thinking about "at-bats" in this way is akin to how VCs think about their portfolio construction.

A concentrated VC may have 10-20 bats in a given fund.

An entrepreneur's portfolio construction is across his/her lifetime.
7) When you think about it in this way, your mindset changes. Obviously you want THIS company to work out well. And you will do your best to make that happen.

But thinking with a "portfolio construction framework" takes some pressure off.
8) It also changes how you do business. I have been trying to work with @shiyankoh for many years now.

I asked her to join me for a startup I started in college! And then with @launchbit. Neither of those worked out. But she joined us for @HustleFundVC.

Never stop recruiting.
9) I have a list in my mind of ppl I want to work with. Most of those ppl are working on other things now. And that's fine. We don't have budget to bring them onboard. But someday, I'm sure I'll work with them.

Life is a longterm game - it's not just about a particular co.
10) In a similar way, many investors have turned me down over the years. Perhaps for my whole series of meandering websites in 2009 onwards. Or for @launchbit.

But we have brought in some of those ppl into @HustleFundVC either Fund 1 or 2.

Rejections are not forever.
11) Rejections are also NOT personal. I suppose sometimes they are. But most of the time there are circumstances you are not aware of that is happening with a wouldbe investor you are pitching.

Maybe they don't have money. Maybe you are out of thesis. Maybe they are too busy.
12) This is why I keep on pitching ppl who have rejected me before. As long as I am addressing their concerns / feedback from before, it's fair game.

I'm sure I will get my eye dr to be an investor someday.
13) And you should too! There have been many times where I have turned down founders and then they went and built something else, and I funded them.
14) Switching gears - your "at-bats" get better over time if you are constantly learning and being self-reflective and truly honest w/ yourself.

My first startup when I was fulltime in my 20s was basically a series of web projects that went nowhere.
15) I had a co-browsing site. And a bunch of affiliate sites across many categories incl wedding supplies / dresses and nutritional supplements.

All of them were terrible businesses. Why? Because I didn't think deeply about cust acq.
16) This adage is so true:

1st time founders focus on product
2nd time founders focus on distribution

I hope to help many 1st time founders avoid the cust acq mistakes I made as a 1st time founder.
17) Specific learnings incl:

A) Competitive areas drive up cust acq costs - avoid!
B) Spend a lot of time figuring out how to get your payback period to be on 1st txn when bootstrapped
C) Increase the value of your cust to make this work; there's only so much you can reduce CAC
18) If you get lots of reps on this, you will get better at spotting opportunities - either for yourself or to invest in.

But you need to try a lot in order to get exp. (Another reason to think in terms of portfolio construction in one's own career)

Practice applies everywhere
19) Having the right team makes a world of difference. Not just in whether you get along or not. But also in culture and skillset.

I LOVE working on @HustleFundVC because of my team.
20) First skillset - when I was in my 20s, I was pretty cocky (internally) that I could do a lot of things. To good extent, that's impt as an entrep - have confidence in learning new things that need to get done.

But don't let that get in the way of finding ppl BETTER than you.
21) E.g. in building out @HustleFundVC I can talk to founders and prospective LPs. I can communicate well with ppl.

But @ericbahn and @shiyankoh are WAY BETTER at it. They have the polish and ppl skills that I don't. And I'm ok w that.
22) We think like a sports team.

I "bring in" a lot of initial "leads" for LPs or founders because of my tweetstorms or blog posts.

But @ericbahn goes & closes them. I know it would be way harder w/ out @ericbahn & @shiyankoh because they are way better at this. Team effort.
23) Culture is also impt. We have had the chance to potentially woo a lot of baller people onto our team. In fact, we are constantly scouting for the future even if there are no openings today.

But, it's not good enough to have amazingly talented ppl.
24) For us @HustleFundVC, anyone who works here has to be humble and a nice person as first and foremost. That itself filters a lot of ppl out - hah.

Have entrepreneurial experience in some form - ideally as a co-founder.

And not take oneself too seriously.
25) Culture isn't about ping pong tables or video games.

Culture is about what your customers or wouldbe customers see from the outside when they meet an employee.

If we have 1 asshole @HustleFundVC, that would ruin the brand. No matter if they pick unicorns.
26) A good test of whether someone fits the "culture" is if you introduced that person to your customers, would your customers LOVE that person?

Not tolerate that person. But LOVE that person.
27) It's really HARD to find ppl who both represent your brand and are also highly skilled (and are available and want to work with you!)

This is why we spend so much time scouting potential recruits for the future.
28) @HustleFundVC is my last startup in my personal career portfolio construction. (No pressure!)

Looking back, I laugh at all my missteps earlier. They were part of the journey.
29) Lastly, we have a lot more to build & are just starting.

But if you still LOVE your team 3 years in & you have some semblance of PM fit - your customers love you & you have some repeatability, you've got something special. Hold onto that & don't let that go. That's the 1.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elizabeth Yin

Elizabeth Yin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dunkhippo33

11 Nov
Some thoughts on network effects and how it's a double edge sword:

First, what are network effects? Most people get this wrong, so it's important to establish definitions upfront

Read on >>
1) I like @NFX 's article on network effects (and there is no other VC IMO that understands network effects like they do)

Read this:
nfx.com/post/network-e…
2) The tl;dr from the article is:

"increased usage of a product leads to a direct increase in the value of that product to its users."
Read 21 tweets
3 Nov
Now I want to talk about the legal ramifications of fundraising this time of the year. (Yippee!!) This is something NOBODY talks about but will affect all entrepreneurs who are raising now.

This is a follow up to my thread:

1) In addition to this being a bad time of year to fundraise, you also have to think about all the parties who are involved in fundraises.

No one ever thinks about the lawyers. Your lawyer, your investors' lawyers, etc.
2) Let's say you slog through everything and get to a handshake with an investor. You still have to go through all the legal bits.

The term sheet & signing, etc. That takes time too.
Read 16 tweets
3 Nov
I want to share publicly the advice I've been giving so many of my portfolio companies of late.

1) tl;dr only fundraise now if you are wrapping up a raise or really need a little bit of money. But NOW is really a horrible time to be raising.

>>
2) First, there's the usual issue of the end of the year. US Thanksgiving is in a couple of weeks. Major holidays are in Dec.

If you don't wrap up your raise by Thanksgiving, it's going to be tough to get things over the finish line in Dec.
3) In addition, this year is a CRAZY yr! There's just so much more going on at a macro level. There's COVID. There's the elections today (which will be a big thing on people's minds for many days or weeks)

The mindshare for your round really isn't there.
Read 10 tweets
31 Oct
Saturday thoughts on funding: Where it helps. Where it doesn't. And how it affects team, success, and PM fit.

This is just my $0.02 after looking reviewing 30k+ early stage startups personally and having led 350+ investments across 2 VC firms & as an angel.

Let's begin! >>
1) Money is great to have in building a startup (for the least dilution and pain possible) That's true and always will be true. 😆

But just like how money can't buy you happiness, it also can't buy you PM fit.
2) PM fit is the holy grail for software startups. (we're not talking biotech - if you have a cure to cancer, I guarantee you everyone wants it).

But for software startups, it's unclear if ppl want your product at your price pt.
Read 21 tweets
29 Oct
Quick thread today on the biggest hurdle after your seed raise

Read on >>
1) One of the things that throws entrepreneurs for a loop is just how quickly you need to level up on new skills that you knew nothing about before and now all of a sudden have to know.
2) In the beginning, it's learning almost *all* skills because it's just you or you and your co-founder(s).

So you have to be reasonably ok at sales / mktg / prod / engr / and get all the legal & admin stuff figured out.
Read 17 tweets
24 Oct
Don't be afraid to ask would-be investors questions. Doing an investment deal with someone is truly a partnership.

Asking qs will not only help you understand the investor and his/her values but also your likelihood of closing that investor:

Some thoughts on this >>
1) First off, my $0.02 applied to both raising for a startup as well as raising for a fund. Just my opinion though - your mileage may vary.

Most ppl go into fundraising (whether raising from a VC or from a fund investor) w the mindset of "I'm trying to pitch for money".
2) That could not be further from the truth.

Both parties hold something valuable. One side holds money. The other side holds equity (or equivalent). The cash is valuable because well cash is cash. The equity is potentially even more valuable down the road.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!