I know many important things are happening in the world right now. It's hard to make room for particularized atrocities, especially those that involve people who have committed terrible crimes. Please spend a minute with me on a grave injustice that's unfolding in our system.
In 2011, Lisa Marie Montgomery was convicted of killing a woman in order to kidnap her unborn baby. Although the crime itself indicates mental illness, prosecutors sought and secured the death penalty under federal law.
Her life has been one failure of people and systems after another. She was raped, tortured, physically and emotionally abused as a child by her mother, by her mother's partners, by plumbers and electricians (her father offered his daughter's body as payment to men), by partners.
At a divorce trial, her abusive mother testified that she had seen her partner raping Ms. Montgomery. No action was taken. Lisa told adults in her life. No one protected her. By adulthood, she had moved more than 60 times and frequently lived in places without running water.
I cannot adequately describe the severity of the trauma she endured and the resulting damage done to her mental health. She committed a terrible crime. She was defended by a lawyer with no death penalty experience. Her trial was marred by misogyny.
Prosecutors referred to her defense as the "abuse excuse." The jury was told that Ms. Montgomery was a bad mother who never cooked and cleaned. The severity of her trauma and illness was not properly presented. And, as happens bc the bar is so high, she lost her appeals.
This October, the Department of Justice announced its intent to execute Ms. Montgomery on December 8. In the middle of a global pandemic, with the imminent possibility of an administration change, the DOJ prioritized the speedy execution of a mentally ill prisoner.
When her lawyers visited her in prison, they found that she had been placed on suicide watch, stripped of her personal possessions, her underwear, her privacy, her eyeglasses, and her CPAP machine. She is given 3 cold showers a week. She appears to be dissociative.
During their visits to prepare her clemency petition, Ms. Montgomery's lawyers contracted Covid-19. They are now bedridden. Additionally, the expert observation required to present her clemency petition has been made nearly impossible by Covid-19.
If Ms. Montgomery is executed, she will be the first woman killed by the federal government for crimes in almost 70 years. She will have been denied the right to present her clemency argument because of the pandemic. She will be killed by a lame duck administration.
No one will be made safer by the execution of a severely traumatized person who has expressed remorse for her crime and requires psychiatric medication and treatment. The victims of her crimes will not be restored in any way by her death.
This is a morally bankrupt outcome. I'm so grateful for the work of Sister @helenprejean, @sandralbabcock, and the many people and organizations working against the unjust, cruel death penalty. I sincerely hope that justice will prevail.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Good morning.
I'm not going to tell you to keep your chin up because I know how disturbed and discouraged many of you are. I know how disturbed and discouraged I am.
We are in for some long days as a country (I didn't think they could get longer but here we are).
Who do we want to be right now? People who pay attention. People who can share good information and counter bad. People who check and double check their sources. People who know what they're talking about.
What we know right now is that the House Democratic majority expanded. We do not yet know which party will control the Senate. We do not know who will be the president.
We've had lots of questions about what's going on in Harris County, Texas, and I'll be talking about it on today's Nightly Nuance. First, here's what we know as of this morning...
Harris County is Texas's most populous county, and it's quite diverse. It offered voters an opportunity to drive thru polling stations at 10 different locations -- 9 using tents and one, at the Toyota Center, using a parking garage.
Republicans challenged the legality of these locations, and the Texas Supreme Court denied a motion to stop drive-thru voting. One justice dissented saying the locations don't count as polling places under Texas law and impermissibly expand curbside voting.
Today's episode of the Nightly Nuance discusses Democratic National Committee v. Wisconsin State Legislature. With the caveat that any opinion from Justice Kavanaugh makes me act like a disgruntled pelican, let's recap with the Roses to attempt to numb the effects.
6 weeks out from Election Day, a District Court extended the deadline for counting WI absentee ballots postmarked by Nov. 3 to Nov. 9. In WI, you can request an absentee ballot until Oct. 29. With Covid, it takes ~ 2 weeks to return the ballot, so the math is...not hard
Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Thomas, and Alito voted to prevent the District Court's order from being enforced without giving us a majority opinion.
I think there is value in answering these questions from @OrinKerr, so I will share that I favor expanding and otherwise reforming the court in every scenario below. We are a country of 300+ million people. The Court receives 7-8k petitions for certiorari each term. /1
That's too much for 9 justices and their clerks.The workload seems to be getting to the Court. Some of its most significant decisions are coming with no explanation. One paragraph orders in voting rights and death penalty cases don't cut it. This speaks to the need for reform.
Every time a Supreme Court justice retires, we are suspicious of the political timing. This speaks to the need for reform.
Every time a Supreme Court justice dies, we enter a political power struggle. This speaks to the need for reform.
We recorded tomorrow's show this morning, and I've been thinking about why I had such a hard time getting my words under me (other than, you know, lack of sleep, overwhelming stress, and profound concern for the direction of our country).
We're seeing lots of messages from people that, paraphrased, go like this: Sorry, Sarah and Beth, but I don't have any nuance left.
And you know what? I don't have a lot right now either. I am beyond finished with the Republican Party and its leadership.
Where I preserve my nuance is for the distinction between the Republican Party and its leadership and people in life who adhere to aspects of what the Party or the President say they're about.
The details of this NY Times story are bananas. So let's review, and imagine Kamala Harris reacting, shall we?
2014: "After tabulating all the profits and losses from Mr. Trump’s various endeavors on Form 1040, the accountants came to Line 56, where they had to enter the total income tax the candidate was required to pay. They needed space for only a single figure.
Zero."
America First? "In 2017, the president’s $750 contribution to the operations of the U.S. government was dwarfed by the $15,598 he or his companies paid in Panama, the $145,400 in India and the $156,824 in the Philippines."